Westside Posted June 21, 2024 Posted June 21, 2024 1 hour ago, Doc said: Man, they must really need Michigan... They’re going to need more than Michigan. They know they’ve pissed off most Americans with their woke BS. They can’t even define what a woman is. Unbelievable!!!
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted June 21, 2024 Author Posted June 21, 2024 9 minutes ago, Westside said: They’re going to need more than Michigan. They know they’ve pissed off most Americans with their woke BS. They can’t even define what a woman is. Unbelievable!!! Ya, POS Trump is going to fix everything. Whatever 🤑
Westside Posted June 21, 2024 Posted June 21, 2024 4 hours ago, Tiberius said: Ya, POS Trump is going to fix everything. Whatever 🤑 Another one of those hi IQ liberals the lefties always brags about. 👆👆👆
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted June 21, 2024 Author Posted June 21, 2024 7 minutes ago, Westside said: Another one of those hi IQ liberals the lefties always brags about. 👆👆👆 What do you see in that absolutely pathetic excuse of a human being?
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted June 28, 2024 Posted June 28, 2024 On 6/16/2024 at 9:52 AM, Scraps said: Strange choice of words regarding a mob that showed up with a gallows chanting "Hang Mike Pence". How ironic. I'm not convince that the Jan 6 defendants are being over charged. Do you have examples? On 6/16/2024 at 9:54 AM, leh-nerd skin-erd said: But that’s not how the justice system works, Tibs. If you have a problem with that you should move to Russia! Last time you asked me a question, I answered and believe you ended up on a milk carton. I find that a waste of time. I spoke out against the actions of 1/6 defendants on 1/6. I’ve not changed nor waivered on that, but if you are advocating for the Tibs mode of locking people up forever because they chanted something, you’re on the wrong side of history. I'm not revisiting this thread because the Supreme freaking Court ultimately decided certain protestors on 1/6 were overcharged (charged incorrectly, overzealous prosecution or whatever you prefer to call it) in the Fischer case, or to point out how my rational and reasoned perspective looks pretty solid when all the dust settled, or because your perspective (and that of others here) seems to suggest you're a bit extreme.... Oh wait, that's exactly whey I revisited this thread. My humble suggestion--step back, look at what you posted, take a deep breath and move back to the center a bit on these issues. Prayers up. 2
B-Man Posted September 25, 2024 Posted September 25, 2024 Ashli Babbitt $30 million ‘wrongful death’ suit gets green light. A federal judge scheduled a trial date for a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the family of Jan. 6 protester Ashli Babbitt, who died after being shot by U.S. Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd. The watchdog group Judicial Watch, which is helping in the lawsuit filed by Babbitt’s husband, Aaron, revealed that Judge Ana C. Reyes of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia scheduled a trial date of July 20, 2026, for the $30 million wrongful death suit. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/3163229/ashli-babbitt-wrongful-death-suit-green-light/ ,
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 26, 2024 Author Posted September 26, 2024 Trump? A man of character? Maybe if you are a filthy racist he is, but people that are actually decent don't think so 1
Westside Posted September 26, 2024 Posted September 26, 2024 8 hours ago, Tiberius said: Trump? A man of character? Maybe if you are a filthy racist he is, but people that are actually decent don't think so Much rather have a dumb ass skank who slept her way through her career. Who’s also dumb as a rock.
All_Pro_Bills Posted Saturday at 10:06 PM Posted Saturday at 10:06 PM 5 hours ago, Homelander said: The judge aided a criminal suspect to evade capture by law enforcement. That's a crime and being a judge does not provide an exemption to disregard the law. The constitutional issue is judges disregarding the law. Not the administration randomly going after judges "they don't like" as some democrats are saying. As usual they miss the initial act and focus on the response.
LDD Posted Saturday at 10:23 PM Posted Saturday at 10:23 PM 15 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The judge aided a criminal suspect to evade capture by law enforcement. That's a crime and being a judge does not provide an exemption to disregard the law. The constitutional issue is judges disregarding the law. Not the administration randomly going after judges "they don't like" as some democrats are saying. As usual they miss the initial act and focus on the response. Agreed, if she aided the suspect then charges should be brought. Also, there is a constitutional issue at hand if the Executive branch is disregarding the Judicial branch. Would you agree?
Homelander Posted Saturday at 10:38 PM Posted Saturday at 10:38 PM (edited) 44 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: The judge aided a criminal suspect to evade capture by law enforcement. That's a crime and being a judge does not provide an exemption to disregard the law. The constitutional issue is judges disregarding the law. Not the administration randomly going after judges "they don't like" as some democrats are saying. If you’re clutching your pearls over Judge Hannah Dugan, buckle up. Wait ‘til you hear about the convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who staged a literal coup, stole classified documents, rigged his case with a pet MAGA judge, and is somehow sitting in the White House. But sure, tell me more about how Dugan "did something wrong." 😂 44 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: As usual they miss the initial act and focus on the response. Oh, the irony. This entire thread is stealing your spotlight — and doing it better. Edited Saturday at 10:51 PM by Homelander
Recommended Posts