BillsFanNC Posted July 3 Author Posted July 3 My former boss — CIA Director John Brennan — should rot in prison. Based on our new understanding of his role in the Trump Russia hysteria, here are the five reasons for why he (and James Comey) should live the rest of their lives behind bars. 1) LYING ABOUT THE STEELE DOSSIER. On January 16th of 2017, Brennan told the WSJ that he never read the Steele Dossier and gave it “no particular credence.” He was lying. On both counts. As his former staff now admit, Brennan specifically pushed for the inclusion of the Steele Dossier in the IC Assessment (ICA) which found that Vladimir Putin “aspired” to help Trump win the 2016 election. Also, we now know that Brennan demanded the Dossier be included in the ICA *DESPITE* explicit verbal and written warnings from his top operational AND analytical management that the Dossier “didn’t meet the most basic [of] tradecraft standards.” Brennan said he didn’t care. As we’re now learning, he said wanted it included in the ICA because it “fit narrative consistency” — aka Trump Russia collusion — and that FBI Director James Comey was demanding the same. Yet, as we now know, both Comey and Brennan knew the Steele Dossier was unvetted gossip… it had been investigated earlier that fall in 2016 by their respective IC elements and found not to be credible. But both Comey and Brennan wanted it in, clearly to destroy President Trump. And we know that because... 2) MANIPULATION OVER WHO WROTE THE ICA OF “PUTIN HELPED TRUMP WIN.” As we’re now learning, Brennan demanded that the CIA take lead in drafting the ICA, intentionally blocking out other intel agencies and the National Intelligence Council. As this new report confirms, that decision “depart[s] significantly from standard procedures for formal IC assessments.” But why would Brennan do that? Here’s the reason: he wanted to control the authors (his employees), their assessment, any dissent, and their careers if they crossed him. And we know that because... 3) BRENNAN INTERFERED IN THE ICA'S DRAFTING. As this new report confirms, “Direct engagement in the ICA's development [by Agency heads] was highly unusual in both scope and intensity. This exceptional level of senior involvement likely influenced participants, altered normal review processes, and ultimately compromised analytic rigor.” Yes, that’s correct. I can confirm as a former CIA Ops Officer, Brennan knew he could make or break the careers of his analysts. And so he did — ensuring that he got the exact ICA he wanted, which included the junk Steele Dossier and a single-source intel report on Trump Russia Collusion. He also took control and influenced the ICA so he could then direct its public release — all to destroy Trump. And we know that because... 4) BRENNAN RUSHED OUT THE REPORT. As we’re now learning, CIA analysts felt “jammed” by Brennan’s timeline to produce the ICA by late December 2016 — despite the fact that “the election had concluded, and the ICA was essentially a post-mortem analysis.” The highly compressed timeline was “atypical” for an ICA, which “ordinarily can take months to prepare, especially for assessments of such length, complexity, and political sensitivity.” But Brennan didn’t care. He wanted this ICA done by the time Trump got into office. He wanted to forever damage the President — and the Republic. And we know that because... 5) BRENNAN (AND COMEY) SPREAD THE ICA FAR AND WIDE. Brennan and Comey worked to distribute the overly-confident ICA (and the discredited Dossier) to “more than 200 US officials. This is unusually high for such a highly compartmented product…” In other words, they briefed it to leak it — to destroy Trump. That’s what the NY Times suspected too. As they asked readers in January of 2017, why would Brennan and Comey have briefed and shared the discredited Dossier “to multiple people in Congress and the executive branch, virtually assuring it would be leaked?” The answer: Brennan and Comey spread the ICA (and Dossier) far and wide by early January 2017 to ensure it all leaked and thus hobbled Donald Trump — and destroy his presidency. ==== As Sen. Chuck Schumer infamously said on MSNBC in January of 2017, “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.” Indeed they do. And indeed they did. BOTTOM LINE: John Brennan, James Comey, and their fellow anti-Trumpers in the IC intentionally and willfully tried to destroy the Presidency of Donald Trump — with a tightly controlled, scripted, rushed, and poorly sourced ICA (and trash Steele Dossier). By doing so, they tried to destroy not just Pres. Trump but the Republic. And that’s why this still matters. These men thought they knew what was best for America and they didn’t give a damn what voters like you thought. It was THEIR country… and they were willing to act on that with their profound powers to destroy a politician they didn’t like. As a former CIA officer, I can’t tell you how infuriating this is. As an American, I can’t tell you how hot my fire burns to bring these men down — and anyone in the Obama White House or Clinton Campaign who colluded with them. At a bare minimum, these two men should be in prison for the rest of their lives and rot in hell for eternity. They’re traitors. They’re scum. They’re subhuman. They deserve maximum punishment for their crimes. God willing, we’ll all be alive to see it. 1
Big Blitz Posted July 3 Posted July 3 (edited) 2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: My former boss — CIA Director John Brennan — should rot in prison. Based on our new understanding of his role in the Trump Russia hysteria, here are the five reasons for why he (and James Comey) should live the rest of their lives behind bars. 1) LYING ABOUT THE STEELE DOSSIER. On January 16th of 2017, Brennan told the WSJ that he never read the Steele Dossier and gave it “no particular credence.” He was lying. On both counts. As his former staff now admit, Brennan specifically pushed for the inclusion of the Steele Dossier in the IC Assessment (ICA) which found that Vladimir Putin “aspired” to help Trump win the 2016 election. Also, we now know that Brennan demanded the Dossier be included in the ICA *DESPITE* explicit verbal and written warnings from his top operational AND analytical management that the Dossier “didn’t meet the most basic [of] tradecraft standards.” Brennan said he didn’t care. As we’re now learning, he said wanted it included in the ICA because it “fit narrative consistency” — aka Trump Russia collusion — and that FBI Director James Comey was demanding the same. Yet, as we now know, both Comey and Brennan knew the Steele Dossier was unvetted gossip… it had been investigated earlier that fall in 2016 by their respective IC elements and found not to be credible. But both Comey and Brennan wanted it in, clearly to destroy President Trump. And we know that because... 2) MANIPULATION OVER WHO WROTE THE ICA OF “PUTIN HELPED TRUMP WIN.” As we’re now learning, Brennan demanded that the CIA take lead in drafting the ICA, intentionally blocking out other intel agencies and the National Intelligence Council. As this new report confirms, that decision “depart[s] significantly from standard procedures for formal IC assessments.” But why would Brennan do that? Here’s the reason: he wanted to control the authors (his employees), their assessment, any dissent, and their careers if they crossed him. And we know that because... 3) BRENNAN INTERFERED IN THE ICA'S DRAFTING. As this new report confirms, “Direct engagement in the ICA's development [by Agency heads] was highly unusual in both scope and intensity. This exceptional level of senior involvement likely influenced participants, altered normal review processes, and ultimately compromised analytic rigor.” Yes, that’s correct. I can confirm as a former CIA Ops Officer, Brennan knew he could make or break the careers of his analysts. And so he did — ensuring that he got the exact ICA he wanted, which included the junk Steele Dossier and a single-source intel report on Trump Russia Collusion. He also took control and influenced the ICA so he could then direct its public release — all to destroy Trump. And we know that because... 4) BRENNAN RUSHED OUT THE REPORT. As we’re now learning, CIA analysts felt “jammed” by Brennan’s timeline to produce the ICA by late December 2016 — despite the fact that “the election had concluded, and the ICA was essentially a post-mortem analysis.” The highly compressed timeline was “atypical” for an ICA, which “ordinarily can take months to prepare, especially for assessments of such length, complexity, and political sensitivity.” But Brennan didn’t care. He wanted this ICA done by the time Trump got into office. He wanted to forever damage the President — and the Republic. And we know that because... 5) BRENNAN (AND COMEY) SPREAD THE ICA FAR AND WIDE. Brennan and Comey worked to distribute the overly-confident ICA (and the discredited Dossier) to “more than 200 US officials. This is unusually high for such a highly compartmented product…” In other words, they briefed it to leak it — to destroy Trump. That’s what the NY Times suspected too. As they asked readers in January of 2017, why would Brennan and Comey have briefed and shared the discredited Dossier “to multiple people in Congress and the executive branch, virtually assuring it would be leaked?” The answer: Brennan and Comey spread the ICA (and Dossier) far and wide by early January 2017 to ensure it all leaked and thus hobbled Donald Trump — and destroy his presidency. ==== As Sen. Chuck Schumer infamously said on MSNBC in January of 2017, “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.” Indeed they do. And indeed they did. BOTTOM LINE: John Brennan, James Comey, and their fellow anti-Trumpers in the IC intentionally and willfully tried to destroy the Presidency of Donald Trump — with a tightly controlled, scripted, rushed, and poorly sourced ICA (and trash Steele Dossier). By doing so, they tried to destroy not just Pres. Trump but the Republic. And that’s why this still matters. These men thought they knew what was best for America and they didn’t give a damn what voters like you thought. It was THEIR country… and they were willing to act on that with their profound powers to destroy a politician they didn’t like. As a former CIA officer, I can’t tell you how infuriating this is. As an American, I can’t tell you how hot my fire burns to bring these men down — and anyone in the Obama White House or Clinton Campaign who colluded with them. At a bare minimum, these two men should be in prison for the rest of their lives and rot in hell for eternity. They’re traitors. They’re scum. They’re subhuman. They deserve maximum punishment for their crimes. God willing, we’ll all be alive to see it. These are the threads that currently exist here - and get bumped by the same commies every time news like this breaks: Why do Trumpers want autocracy Trump is a fascist (5 versions of this one) Trump is a liar lips moving blah blah We will never kiss the ring And since 2016 - probably 50 threads on all things Trump/Russia Like Covidism, this sham blew up in their faces as another deep state lie. Crimes committed by the people they think were “scandal free” were the worst authoritarian trash to ever govern this country. Their silence tells you all you need to know. They're the fascist autocrats. Edited July 3 by Big Blitz 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 19 Author Posted July 19 Also watch this, because the left will continue to refuse to believe any of it. Fully demoralized. 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 19 Author Posted July 19 I guarantee that none of the demoralized leftists polluting the cesspool know even the first thing about Igor Danchenko and his central role in the whole absurd, and treasonous, affair. Five years ago today, a group of random internet users exposed what still stands as the biggest breakthrough in the Russiagate hoax: the identification of Igor Danchenko, the Clinton operative who fabricated a litany of lies about Trump-Russia collusion, and whom the FBI had painstakingly buried deep inside its darkest files to prevent the truth from ever coming out. That truth was as simple as it was devastating: The entire Russiagate hoax had been fabricated from start to finish, every single part of it. It all started with a chance meeting between myself and @ClimateAudit in 2018, where we both honed in on one simple idea: if we could somehow figure out who supposedly had access to Putin’s innermost secrets—who was the source for most, if not all, of the accusations against Trump—we could blow the whole thing wide open. We never could have done it on our own, or without the brilliant help of so many internet sleuths who pitched in—none more so than @FOOL_NELSON and @walkafyre and of course “hmmm,” who put the final pieces of the puzzle together. What we found was even worse than we imagined. We knew the collusion tale was made up, but still assumed the supposed super source would at least be somewhat credible—maybe a former Russian intelligence officer or someone who knew Putin. Instead, what we found in Danchenko was a total nobody who knew nothing about anything, other than how to invent fairytales. To make matters worse, he wasn’t even in Russia. He was living in Washington, D.C., hustling for scraps, including at the Democrat-aligned Brookings Institution, where anti-Trump impeachment witness Fiona Hill served as his mentor. And with that, on this day five years ago, Russiagate died. The central narrative had collapsed because the person who supposedly had all this information turned out to be a washed-up D.C. fantasist-for-hire. And it wasn’t a Pulitzer-winning journalist or a congressional committee that exposed it. It was a handful of random internet users with day jobs. 1 2
SectionC3 Posted July 19 Posted July 19 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: I guarantee that none of the demoralized leftists polluting the cesspool know even the first thing about Igor Danchenko and his central role in the whole absurd, and treasonous, affair. Five years ago today, a group of random internet users exposed what still stands as the biggest breakthrough in the Russiagate hoax: the identification of Igor Danchenko, the Clinton operative who fabricated a litany of lies about Trump-Russia collusion, and whom the FBI had painstakingly buried deep inside its darkest files to prevent the truth from ever coming out. That truth was as simple as it was devastating: The entire Russiagate hoax had been fabricated from start to finish, every single part of it. It all started with a chance meeting between myself and @ClimateAudit in 2018, where we both honed in on one simple idea: if we could somehow figure out who supposedly had access to Putin’s innermost secrets—who was the source for most, if not all, of the accusations against Trump—we could blow the whole thing wide open. We never could have done it on our own, or without the brilliant help of so many internet sleuths who pitched in—none more so than @FOOL_NELSON and @walkafyre and of course “hmmm,” who put the final pieces of the puzzle together. What we found was even worse than we imagined. We knew the collusion tale was made up, but still assumed the supposed super source would at least be somewhat credible—maybe a former Russian intelligence officer or someone who knew Putin. Instead, what we found in Danchenko was a total nobody who knew nothing about anything, other than how to invent fairytales. To make matters worse, he wasn’t even in Russia. He was living in Washington, D.C., hustling for scraps, including at the Democrat-aligned Brookings Institution, where anti-Trump impeachment witness Fiona Hill served as his mentor. And with that, on this day five years ago, Russiagate died. The central narrative had collapsed because the person who supposedly had all this information turned out to be a washed-up D.C. fantasist-for-hire. And it wasn’t a Pulitzer-winning journalist or a congressional committee that exposed it. It was a handful of random internet users with day jobs. Personally I’d like to know about the Epstein files but you and your Group Of Pervs won’t release them.
B-Man Posted July 19 Posted July 19 7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Personally I’d like to know about the Epstein files but you and your Group Of Pervs won’t release them. So, No real comment on the Confirmed Russian Hoax. What a surprise. 1
Westside Posted July 19 Posted July 19 Leftists are awfully quiet around here. Dirty F’n bastards!! 1
Big Blitz Posted July 19 Posted July 19 (edited) That the Obama administration would do this in 2016 - at the time was too unbelievable for people to fathom. At least Indys. But now, 10 years later in a post COVID world and seeing every single thing they’ve done to try and get Trump - it’s time for justice. There can be no excuses or claims of Trump using lawfare in an unprecedented way. Nope. Sorry losers. We knew Obama was guilty then. It just may not have been acceptable or seen as some kind of norm defying event. Not anymore. We have 10 years of leftist events completely dismantling public trust in the media and Democrats. Obama wiretapped his political opponent during a presidential campaign, and there was no evidence of collusion. Bonus tid bit: Paul Ryan met with Obama at his Kalorama house in secret literally immediately after the 2017 inauguration - am I the only one who reads the Daily Mail? Edited July 19 by Big Blitz 1
BillsFanNC Posted July 19 Author Posted July 19 Bullstojan swallowing loads from the wood paneling glory hole today deep. Cope and seethe baby!! 1
Big Blitz Posted July 19 Posted July 19 Tapper on left in 2024: *Denies ever leading CNN viewers to believe Trump was colluding with Russia in 2016* Tapper on right in 2016: “Pushes narrative that Trump was colluding with Russia*
SCBills Posted July 19 Posted July 19 This is, obviously, crazy .. but what happens? Mainstream media ignores it because it makes Democrats look bad and then nothing happens after an investigation? It will live on Fox and in podcast circles, but forgive me if I currently believe that’s the extent of this.
JDHillFan Posted July 19 Posted July 19 22 minutes ago, SCBills said: This is, obviously, crazy .. but what happens? Mainstream media ignores it because it makes Democrats look bad and then nothing happens after an investigation? It will live on Fox and in podcast circles, but forgive me if I currently believe that’s the extent of this. You are probably right. Both sides suck. That one side could try to undermine an election in this way is truly disgraceful for our country. That many are perfectly fine with it and perfectly fine with someone leading the country from the shadows 2020-2024 is hard to fathom. Yes, Trump is wretched and “where’s the list”. Fingers crossed for at least four years of President Vance/VP Rubio. 1
Recommended Posts