AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: they do in real life. people waited for and paid for my opinion for over 30 years. Colleagues referred to me. so yeah. the forum is for shites and giggles. I don't really care if you do. I don't. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago 57 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: he contributes nothing here. From some of his posts, he's probably a basement dwelling Q follower. I doubt he's taken seriously in real life either. Something very tommy eyerolls about him. 48 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: he certainly writes like a legal scholar 😂 ! care to share unseen's credentials? You know, like the banner below an expert giving opinion on an actual news source....never mind you've made it clear that you find education unimportant in most areas. Why not the law? This "unseen" is probably the dumbest commenter on Supreme Court matters I've ever, umm, seen. Yes the word "tariff" is different than the word "regulate." That's kind of what the law is all about, the meaning of a word used here and not used there. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/11/05/us/trump-tariffs-supreme-court After the arguments wrapped, several of the small business owners who sued over President Trump’s tariffs gathered on the steps of the Supreme Court. Victor Schwartz, the small wine importer who is the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, told reporters the economic pain of the tariffs had been felt “across the country, from warehouse workers and truckers to retailers and restauranteurs.” He added that he was disappointed that larger companies with more resources had not spoken up. “When I was given the chance to speak up for small American businesses, I took it,” Mr. Schwartz said. “I had to – our very survival is at stake.” 1
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago I would comment in this thread but I'm stuck here in a 4-hour Teams meeting. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: I would comment in this thread but I'm stuck here in a 4-hour Teams meeting. Sorry to hear, I hope they let you go a little early at least 🍷
boyst Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: I would comment in this thread but I'm stuck here in a 4-hour Teams meeting. "Anything on your end?" "No" Boom. Promotion. 2
TH3 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 5 hours ago, B-Man said: Not everyone hearing what Frank and Joe are. ADDED: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx So some anonomous Twitter Phuk posting obvious maga points more salient than two guys who listened posting well though out observations 1
JDHillFan Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 58 minutes ago, TH3 said: So some anonomous Twitter Phuk posting obvious maga points more salient than two guys who listened posting well though out observations One of those people was Redhawk. He’s unstable. The other was Frankish. He declared Biden to be mentally fit for the presidency AFTER watching the debate. Unstable? That’s for you to decide. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, TH3 said: So some anonomous Twitter Phuk posting obvious maga points more salient than two guys who listened posting well though out observations I think we all interpret the proceedings in a somewhat biased manner. At a CNN roundtable, all were asked which justice they were watching. A legal reporter said "Alito". Wow! I'm waiting for Marcia Coyle to weigh in on PBS. She's better than most at reading tea leaves and has covered SCOTUS for decades. In the end, we need to wait for the decision. Edited 16 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever
B-Man Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, TH3 said: So some anonomous Twitter Phuk posting obvious maga points more salient than two guys who listened posting well though out observations Hilarious. The 'anonymous' (correct spelling) Twitter poster has 71 thousand followers. Doesn't mean that he is correct of course, but it is so funny that you automatically take Frank N Beans opinion over him.............................because you don't agree with him.
The Frankish Reich Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago 5 hours ago, B-Man said: Hilarious. The 'anonymous' (correct spelling) Twitter poster has 71 thousand followers. Doesn't mean that he is correct of course, but it is so funny that you automatically take Frank N Beans opinion over him.............................because you don't agree with him. Kim Kardashian has 73 MILLION Twitter followers. So obviously she is right about those fake moon landings. 1
TH3 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 11 hours ago, JDHillFan said: One of those people was Redhawk. He’s unstable. The other was Frankish. He declared Biden to be mentally fit for the presidency AFTER watching the debate. Unstable? That’s for you to decide. I was driving and listened to much of the hearing. Unseen comments aren’t meant to be factual…they are meant to stir crap with guys like you…and you trot them out like they have weight
JDHillFan Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 15 minutes ago, TH3 said: I was driving and listened to much of the hearing. Unseen comments aren’t meant to be factual…they are meant to stir crap with guys like you…and you trot them out like they have weight Do you value someone’s opinion that believed Biden was mentally fit for the presidency AFTER watching the debate? It’s ok if you do.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 14 hours ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: I would comment in this thread but I'm stuck here in a 4-hour Teams meeting. Did anyone have the camera pitched at an odd angle, shooting up into the bottom of their nose? That’s always pleasant.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, B-Man said: Hilarious. The 'anonymous' (correct spelling) Twitter poster has 71 thousand followers. Doesn't mean that he is correct of course, but it is so funny that you automatically take Frank N Beans opinion over him.............................because you don't agree with him. You do know that people buy twitter bots to make it look like they are popular, right? 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 15 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/11/05/us/trump-tariffs-supreme-court After the arguments wrapped, several of the small business owners who sued over President Trump’s tariffs gathered on the steps of the Supreme Court. Victor Schwartz, the small wine importer who is the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, told reporters the economic pain of the tariffs had been felt “across the country, from warehouse workers and truckers to retailers and restauranteurs.” He added that he was disappointed that larger companies with more resources had not spoken up. “When I was given the chance to speak up for small American businesses, I took it,” Mr. Schwartz said. “I had to – our very survival is at stake.” I read up a bit on VOS Selections and Schwartz’s concerns. I certainly can feel for the guy, he worked hard, built a business and the uncertainty with the tariffs has got to be very difficult. In one interview, he also mentioned that his margins were already very thin due to the regulatory situation in NY and NJ. His business is required to post pricing for his product a month in advance, and with product/market conditions fluctuating, things turn south. He also mentioned that consumer habits are shifting away from wine consumption, or maybe at least the services he offers. It sounds like he’s got an uphill battle regardless of the outcome of the tariff discussion. I wonder what he thinks about the political situation in NYC, and if things get better or worse even if he prevails in this case.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 55 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I read up a bit on VOS Selections and Schwartz’s concerns. I certainly can feel for the guy, he worked hard, built a business and the uncertainty with the tariffs has got to be very difficult. In one interview, he also mentioned that his margins were already very thin due to the regulatory situation in NY and NJ. His business is required to post pricing for his product a month in advance, and with product/market conditions fluctuating, things turn south. He also mentioned that consumer habits are shifting away from wine consumption, or maybe at least the services he offers. It sounds like he’s got an uphill battle regardless of the outcome of the tariff discussion. I wonder what he thinks about the political situation in NYC, and if things get better or worse even if he prevails in this case. All businesses face headwinds, and that's why this inane, illegal and anti-business tariff is so stupid.
JFKjr Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 47 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: All businesses face headwinds, and that's why this inane, illegal and anti-business tariff is so stupid. Maybe we could gin up another Scamdemic.
The Frankish Reich Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago It is the same case as Biden's student loan forgiveness case (which the Supreme Court shot down), just with the political roles reversed. That decision was correct.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 25 minutes ago, JFKjr said: Maybe we could gin up another Scamdemic. How many will die in this one? Over a million in last one
Recommended Posts