B-Man Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 Judge Cannon Calls Jack Smith Out For His Dirty Tricks in Rare Sunday Order by Christina Laila Judge Aileen Cannon called out Special Counsel Jack Smith for his dirty tricks in Trump’s classified documents case in a rare Sunday filing. Jack Smith has repeatedly warned of a ‘significant, immediate’ threat to the government witnesses if their names were unredacted. The Special Counsel has been fighting to keep the names of government witnesses a secret. He also opposed the unsealing of discovery material because one document confirms the existence of another FBI investigation. In a five-page order, Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, said that she is “disappointed” that Jack Smith has demanded redactions for “witness safety” when it benefits him, but ignored those concerns at other times. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/judge-cannon-calls-jack-smith-his-dirty-tricks/ . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 20 Author Share Posted May 20 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 RIP "documents case." 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 21 Author Share Posted May 21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 21 Author Share Posted May 21 We learned today that the FBI authorized use of force in an already unprecedented raid at the private residence of a former POTUS. Don't let that distract you from other details that we also learned today... Attorney-client privilege is a core right and professional obligation in America's legal system. It's one of the things that make our entire system work. So it's a big deal that, as part of his grand jury proceedings, Jack Smith's prosecutors threatened one of Trump's former lawyers, suggesting that by refusing to waive attorney-client privilege — refusing to compromise his professional integrity — he was signaling that Trump was guilty of a crime. “Why hasn’t your client waived privilege? Is it because he’s GUILTY?” Jack Smith's team are out of control. They belong in prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 21 Share Posted May 21 29 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: We learned today that the FBI authorized use of force in an already unprecedented raid at the private residence of a former POTUS. Don't let that distract you from other details that we also learned today... Attorney-client privilege is a core right and professional obligation in America's legal system. It's one of the things that make our entire system work. So it's a big deal that, as part of his grand jury proceedings, Jack Smith's prosecutors threatened one of Trump's former lawyers, suggesting that by refusing to waive attorney-client privilege — refusing to compromise his professional integrity — he was signaling that Trump was guilty of a crime. “Why hasn’t your client waived privilege? Is it because he’s GUILTY?” Jack Smith's team are out of control. They belong in prison. @The Frankish Reich thoughts on this? I believe the Grand Jury is +/- a rubber stamp in many cases, a one-sided visitation of evidence designed to get to the next step where the fun begins. Based on what we know---the evidence team gathered documents outside the scope of the court order, including tax returns and attorney/client documents, then fought tooth and nail to keep an independent party from reviewing documentation and determine what should be returned, what was fair for the govt to keep, and of course staged photos for release to the press---is it fair to suggest "thuggery" in play here? It seems from the reaction of Attorney Parlatore that he was completely taken aback by the line of questioning the govt (wo)man was pursuing. "Are you---are we really doing this?" seems to imply he thought some lines were being crossed. I'm not suggesting the govt man's actions were "lawless", because it seems like there is tremendous latitude given the home team, but what say you? Do you think the plan was to leverage the tension/stress of the proceeding to get Parlatore to make a mistake and violate Trump's confidence, knowing full well that conversations were privileged? Do you think a mistake was made by Attorney Edelstein, that perhaps she lost track of the rules regarding attny/client privilege and inadvertently asked a bad question? Or, is this sort of business as usual, where anyone can ask pretty much anything at any time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 Just like the commies here..... Only reliable media! We must silence others! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted May 25 Author Share Posted May 25 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted May 25 Share Posted May 25 8 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: Leaks, staged photos, misstatements to the court, a senator/vp/president stashing classified documents pilfered documents over decades wherever the box falls….fine. Complaining about the process involving deadly force…a threat to national security and all that is good and holy. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted Tuesday at 04:50 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 04:50 PM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted Tuesday at 08:13 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 08:13 PM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts