Jump to content

2005 Strength Of Schedule


Tom

Recommended Posts

2005 Strength Of Schedule

Team Winning Percentage Opp. Total Wins Opp. Total Losses

Dolphins .547 140 116

Chargers .543 139 117

Patriots .539 138 118

Jets .535 137 119

Chiefs .535 137 119

Ravens .531 136 120

Bills .531 136 120

Browns .527 135 121

Raiders .527 135 121

Broncos .523 134 122

Bengals .523 134 122

Steelers .508 130 126

Jaguars .504 129 127

Colts .504 129 127

Texans .504 129 127

Falcons .500 128 128

Packers .496 127 129

Buccaneers .492 126 130

Panthers .492 126 130

Saints .492 126 130

Titans .492 126 130

Lions .488 125 131

Giants .488 125 131

Vikings .480 123 133

Bears .480 123 133

Cowboys .477 122 134

49ers .471 113 127

Redskins .465 119 137

Seahawks .457 117 139

Eagles .453 116 140

Cardinals .449 115 141

Rams .445 114 142

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You gotta beat the best to get to the Super Bowl, anyway, so bring 'em on.

 

Worrying, or whining, about strength of schedule is a waste of time.

353833[/snapback]

 

amen. does anybody remember what the last 10 super bowl champions' SOS was?

 

didn't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a bit deceptive for the Bills, Fish and Jets since these teams are the only teams to have to play the Patriots twice.

 

In my opinion, our schedule is fantastic for a newbie QB - lots of winnable games AT HOME to start with the tougher games coming after JP has gotten his feet wet.

 

Bring It On!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

S.O.S. really dosnt mean as much as it used to with all the parity...you never how a team is going to do this season...last year SD would have appeared as an easily winnable game and lower your sos, but i guarantee, no team was in a hurry to play them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone notice that the NFC has only one team that plays a schedule that is .500. Also, the top 15 teams are in the AFC and only the Titans play a below .500 (.492) schedule. It kind of shows who is the dominant conference. Even back in the late 80's and early 90's, the NFC wasn't nearly as dominant as the AFC is today. Funny too that the Super Bowl runner-up plays a .453 schedule. Goes to show that when the Bills play the NFC south (probably the best NFC conference) this year, no one is going to terribly worried. The Falcons aren't nearly as good as their record showed last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mostly because they play in the NFC, methinks.

354001[/snapback]

 

Well, yeah, that was my point... :w00t: ...even though things do change considerably from one year to the next, the NFC still sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone notice that the NFC has only one team that plays a schedule that is .500. Also, the top 15 teams are in the AFC and only the Titans play a below .500 (.492) schedule. It kind of shows who is the dominant conference. Even back in the late 80's and early 90's, the NFC wasn't nearly as dominant as the AFC is today. Funny too that the Super Bowl runner-up plays a .453 schedule. Goes to show that when the Bills play the NFC south (probably the best NFC conference) this year, no one is going to terribly worried. The Falcons aren't nearly as good as their record showed last year.

353865[/snapback]

 

Yep. I noticed that a month ago. I put together a chart and wondered why other than not wanting to make NFC look like a sick dog that a sports media site hasn't done more with this.

 

Another way to represent this data:

http://members.cox.net/billswatch/2005_Cal...f_Schedule.html

 

See how obvious it is NFC is weaker conference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a bit deceptive for the Bills, Fish and Jets since these teams are the only teams to have to play the Patriots twice.

 

In my opinion, our schedule is fantastic for a newbie QB - lots of winnable games AT HOME to start with the tougher games coming after JP has gotten his feet wet.

 

Bring It On!!

353840[/snapback]

Cinci, Balt, and Cleveland all have to play Pittsburgh twice -- a team that had a better record than the Patsies. Only Baltimore is in the top 7 -- at #6.

 

AFCEast is the toughest division and has been most of the time over the last couple of decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...