The Frankish Reich Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, JDHillFan said: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3925574/ Sounded made up in 2014 when this was published back in the Obama era, didn’t it? I think there have been advances in technology since then that may have made it more of a thing. you DO NOT want this case solved, do you Here's what I see. Capitol Hill cop testifies against leading "3 percenter" and obviously guilty Guy Reffitt. (Just take a quick look at his own statements) Glenn Beck and his crack team of "gait analysts" compare some tiny sample of the cop's "gait" to video of person leaving pipe bomb under a bench. Glenn Beck issues spurious "conclusion" that there is a 94-97% chance that cop is the pipe bomb suspect in the video. This is actually libel/slander against the cop.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: "Gait Match" = spurious 94-97% accuracy. Yeah. Gait Match. I would think that a gait match of 94-97% has all the hallmarks of proof that some intelligence operatives may have been involved. Now, seriously, I know a guy who sold his security business quite a few years ago. Prior to selling, he was telling me that they were working on some “very high-tech CSI” information including body language analysis. He did not mention gate analysis. I’ll wait and see, and don’t see these guys as the final source of truth and justice (in line with other media types) but I would not be surprised in the least.
The Frankish Reich Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I would think that a gait match of 94-97% has all the hallmarks of proof that some intelligence operatives may have been involved. I would say it's more likely that someone in Trump law enforcement is trying to get revenge against someone who testified against his J6 rioters by feeding bs to Glenn Beck.
Orlando Buffalo Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 23 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: "Gait Match" = spurious 94-97% accuracy. Yeah. Gait Match. Are you telling me you can't tell your wife from behind by the way she walks? Seriously this is not some crazy new thought. It was in the MI move like a decade ago. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Are you telling me you can't tell your wife from behind by the way she walks? Seriously this is not some crazy new thought. It was in the MI move like a decade ago. I am telling you it is completely unreliable. Think about the error. First of all, why did Glenn Beck decide to compare the pipe bomber to this particular cop and not to the thousands of others in and around the J6 protests? Did he compare the gait to any of them? If so, how many? In other words, it's a Seek and Ye Shall Find mini-dragnet with a sample size (as far as we know) of one. Second, who did the "gait analysis?" Any indication of whether it has been shown to be accurate in controlled studies? Where does the bs precise "94-97%" come from? Are they saying that even when it dings "match" there's a 3 in 100 to 6 in 100 chance that it wasn't the subject? This is no "breakthrough" or anything that would resemble sufficient evidence to even get a search warrant, much less to publicly accuse someone of a crime. There's a lot of crap in Mission Impossible movies. Maybe you shouldn't believe everything Tom Cruise does in movies.
Wacka Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Isn't she the woman that "found" the "bomb"? Just another example of the Iron Law of the Dems.
BillsFanNC Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago And remember we have the suspect on surveillance cam on her cell phone during the bomb placement....but guess what? Corrupted data! 😂 They also have the car the suspect got into and a metro pass used ....but the FBI remained flummoxed! Now we have an agent who was put on surveillance duty to the house next door to this suspect in the days after J6 saying he was inexplicably called off the detail. The FBI could track down every grandma who breathed air in the vicinity of the Capitol on J6 in short order, but just couldn't crack the case of someone who PLANTED BOMBS in DC on J5... And Finding buys all of it! Again, what a putz. 6 minutes ago, Wacka said: Isn't she the woman that "found" the "bomb"? Just another example of the Iron Law of the Dems. No, that was Carlin Younger who "found" the RNC bomb. She also has some explaining to do. Amazing that both bombs, after sitting in plain sight overnight and all morning, were miraculously found around the same time on J6, right before the joint session was supposed to convene.
BillsFanNC Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago And Finding and the rest of the leftists should be grateful for the Blaze making progress here, right? I mean this was supposedly a MAGA terrorist placing these bombs, right? Or nah? 😂 1
JDHillFan Posted 47 minutes ago Posted 47 minutes ago 58 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: I am telling you it is completely unreliable. Think about the error. First of all, why did Glenn Beck decide to compare the pipe bomber to this particular cop and not to the thousands of others in and around the J6 protests? Did he compare the gait to any of them? If so, how many? In other words, it's a Seek and Ye Shall Find mini-dragnet with a sample size (as far as we know) of one. Second, who did the "gait analysis?" Any indication of whether it has been shown to be accurate in controlled studies? Where does the bs precise "94-97%" come from? Are they saying that even when it dings "match" there's a 3 in 100 to 6 in 100 chance that it wasn't the subject? This is no "breakthrough" or anything that would resemble sufficient evidence to even get a search warrant, much less to publicly accuse someone of a crime. There's a lot of crap in Mission Impossible movies. Maybe you shouldn't believe everything Tom Cruise does in movies. It could well be incorrect information that’s currently being spewed. The only two things that seem certain are that you are clueless about gait analysis (similar to when you pretended to know about Canadian Mennonite population centers) and you seem very invested in not wanting this case solved. Seems weird for someone as fiercely independent as you.
BillsFanNC Posted 43 minutes ago Author Posted 43 minutes ago I'd expect that Ms. Kerkhoff has retained legal counsel and is prepared to sue The Blaze into oblivion. Right, Finding?
BillsFanNC Posted 36 minutes ago Author Posted 36 minutes ago The forensic study, arranged by Blaze News, revealed that Kerkhoff is up to a 98% match to the gait of the pipe-bomb suspect. The findings were confirmed by several current intelligence sources who viewed the study results. The source who did the comparison said the software rated the match at 94%. He put the figure at closer to a 96%-98% match, including a combination of human intelligence and the software analysis.
BillsFanNC Posted 21 minutes ago Author Posted 21 minutes ago Finding's reliable media was on the story and then.....POOF....they weren't. I wonder why?
Recommended Posts