Westside Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: I think they would say they had no choice but to fight off a foreign invader. But the Russians had a choice and made the wrong one. Who knows, it may have even affected your friends and family there.... So, under the lefts twisted version of truth, you support Ukraine is a support for neo-nazis then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: I think they would say they had no choice but to fight off a foreign invader. But the Russians had a choice and made the wrong one. Who knows, it may have even affected your friends and family there.... There's always a choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 7 minutes ago, Westside said: So, under the lefts twisted version of truth, you support Ukraine is a support for neo-nazis then. try again, in English. 6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: There's always a choice. for russia, yes. not for Ukraine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Just now, BillStime said: Cruz and Rubio were fighting each other to kiss trump's ring yesterday. They aren't insane. They're just scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 22 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: What do you suspect the 500k dead Ukrainians would say? Live free or die? Give me liberty or give me death? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: try again, in English. for russia, yes. not for Ukraine. I’m sorry for your limited vocabulary dr.😂😂😂😂😂😂 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Cruz and Rubio were fighting each other to kiss trump's ring yesterday. They aren't insane. They're just scum. You would know scum when you see it. You see it everyday in the mirror. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, Westside said: I’m sorry for your limited vocabulary dr.😂😂😂😂😂😂 You would know scum when you see it. You see it everyday in the mirror. witty! at least half way. but your side keeps saying this whole neo nazi movement is tiny and insignificant even tho there appear to be several in residence here. There are more than a few in Europe too- https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7bnja/neo-nazi-music-shows-return-to-europe. Ukraine has bigger problems, namely murderous russians. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, Westside said: scum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 25 minutes ago, BillStime said: Except that is not what he said, and you clowns know it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 5 minutes ago, wnyguy said: Except that is not what he said, and you clowns know it. Translate what he said? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 3 minutes ago, BillStime said: Translate what he said? I don't have to translate - Here is what he said - "I came in, I made a speech, and they said you got to pay up. They asked me that question. One of the presidents of a big country stood up said, 'Well, sir, if we don't pay and we're attacked by Russia, will you protect us?' I said 'you didn't pay your delinquent?' He said, 'Yes, let's say that happened.' 'No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You got to pay; you got to pay your bills.' And the money came flowing in." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 1 minute ago, wnyguy said: 'No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You got to pay; you got to pay your bills.' And the money came flowing in." Enough said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Just now, BillStime said: Enough said. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 16 minutes ago, wnyguy said: Except that is not what he said, and you clowns know it. Oh, so now we are in the "he didn't actually say" what he said mode. Great. I guess he didn't say he was a pu ssy grabber, either 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Oh, so now we are in the "he didn't actually say" what he said mode. Great. I guess he didn't say he was a pu ssy grabber, either I posted what he said, my good man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Ferguson forever Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 10 minutes ago, wnyguy said: I don't have to translate - Here is what he said - "I came in, I made a speech, and they said you got to pay up. They asked me that question. One of the presidents of a big country stood up said, 'Well, sir, if we don't pay and we're attacked by Russia, will you protect us?' I said 'you didn't pay your delinquent?' He said, 'Yes, let's say that happened.' 'No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You got to pay; you got to pay your bills.' And the money came flowing in." here's what you and orange man don't understand (from a CNN editorial): As with much foreign policy, the Republican frontrunner radically misunderstood the nature and purpose of this relationship. NATO is not an alliance based on dues: it is the largest military bloc in history, formed to face down the Soviet threat, based on the collective defense that an attack on one is an attack on all – a principle enshrined in Article 5 of NATO’s founding treaty. It’s purpose which suits the US profoundly: The White House invoked Article 5 after 9/11. And since NATO’s creation, US might has been often packaged globally as the expression of a dozens-strong consensus. NATO helps bolster the US’s ebbing position as the sole hyperpower. Strip away this vast alliance, and its diplomatic and economic might, and the US looks quite lonely on the world stage. In short, the US will almost certainly always spend much more than anyone else on its military, regardless of its allies. NATO gives it a global bedrock of legitimacy, support for the dollar, and the post-Soviet hegemony it thrives upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: here's what you and orange man don't understand (from a CNN editorial): As with much foreign policy, the Republican frontrunner radically misunderstood the nature and purpose of this relationship. NATO is not an alliance based on dues: it is the largest military bloc in history, formed to face down the Soviet threat, based on the collective defense that an attack on one is an attack on all – a principle enshrined in Article 5 of NATO’s founding treaty. It’s purpose which suits the US profoundly: The White House invoked Article 5 after 9/11. And since NATO’s creation, US might has been often packaged globally as the expression of a dozens-strong consensus. NATO helps bolster the US’s ebbing position as the sole hyperpower. Strip away this vast alliance, and its diplomatic and economic might, and the US looks quite lonely on the world stage. In short, the US will almost certainly always spend much more than anyone else on its military, regardless of its allies. NATO gives it a global bedrock of legitimacy, support for the dollar, and the post-Soviet hegemony it thrives upon. Oh we understand. The NATO allies all want the perks and protection from the treaty but when it comes to actually investing in it, not so much. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 8 minutes ago, wnyguy said: Oh we understand. The NATO allies all want the perks and protection from the treaty but when it comes to actually investing in it, not so much. So F them, right? Hey Putin - GO GET EM - I won't do jack to stop you - as a matter of fact - I'll cheer you on and so will my pathetic followers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnyguy Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Just now, BillStime said: So F them, right? Hey Putin - GO GET EM - I won't do jack to stop you - as a matter of fact - I'll cheer you on and so will my pathetic followers. And in fact after Trump said that the NATO allies decided they would pony up their fair share. Funny how that worked out, ain't it ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts