Jump to content

"BREAKING" NEWS: Sexual predator Donald Trump RAPED Katie Johnson and E Jean Carroll - $83M verdict


Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Where did she go?
 

Why did she disappear?

 

Why didn’t she sue Biden?

 

Is she too busy on Kremlin owned RT tv or is she on Tucker Carlson promoting RageAgainstTheWarMachine like she was the other night?

 

 

 

 

That’s your standard?  Why didn’t E J Crazy pursue criminal charges against DJT when the incident allegedly occurred?  
 

Here’s the fact— Biden has admitted inappropriately touching women, and his VP has stated she believes Tara Reid was sexually assaulted by Joe Biden.  
 

What that lead to was millions of people voting for him to be President, that is to say, people like you…and Frenx….and others made him the most powerful person in the world in essence saying certain women don’t matter. 
 

Trump has been the exception to the rule on govt tyranny—defending himself with a big FU with bogus claims of being a Russian plant, and being the target of political persecution.  
 

Most people would have cracked by now, and I’d think TR recognized her best course of action is to

lay low and let this old man continue on his path to cognitive decline.  
 

It’s a story as old as time, really.  Powerful people get away with things like this.  Hell, Kamala sold out to be his VP, what chance would Tara Reade have? 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

That’s your standard?  Why didn’t E J Crazy pursue criminal charges against DJT when the incident allegedly occurred?  
 

Here’s the fact— Biden has admitted inappropriately touching women, and his VP has stated she believes Tara Reid was sexually assaulted by Joe Biden.  
 

What that lead to was millions of people voting for him to be President, that is to say, people like you…and Frenx….and others made him the most powerful person in the world in essence saying certain women don’t matter. 
 

Trump has been the exception to the rule on govt tyranny—defending himself with a big FU with bogus claims of being a Russian plant, and being the target of political persecution.  
 

Most people would have cracked by now, and I’d think TR recognized her best course of action is to

lay low and let this old man continue on his path to cognitive decline.  
 

It’s a story as old as time, really.  Powerful people get away with things like this.  Hell, Kamala sold out to be his VP, what chance would Tara Reade have? 


Standard? What other standard matters?


Carroll filed a defamation lawsuit against Mr. Trump in New York for making disparaging comments and branding her a liar after the publication of her memoir. On Oct. 19, the former president was questioned under oath in the case.Jan 13, 2023

 

Why didn’t Tara Reade sue Biden?

 

Why did her story fall apart?

 

After all we know about Trump - paying legal fees for January 6 witnesses - isn’t it ironic the lawyer representing Tara Reade is huge Trump donor?

 

Keep spinning Leo

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

That’s your standard?  Why didn’t E J Crazy pursue criminal charges against DJT when the incident allegedly occurred?  
 

Here’s the fact— Biden has admitted inappropriately touching women, and his VP has stated she believes Tara Reid was sexually assaulted by Joe Biden.  
 

What that lead to was millions of people voting for him to be President, that is to say, people like you…and Frenx….and others made him the most powerful person in the world in essence saying certain women don’t matter. 
 

Trump has been the exception to the rule on govt tyranny—defending himself with a big FU with bogus claims of being a Russian plant, and being the target of political persecution.  
 

Most people would have cracked by now, and I’d think TR recognized her best course of action is to

lay low and let this old man continue on his path to cognitive decline.  
 

It’s a story as old as time, really.  Powerful people get away with things like this.  Hell, Kamala sold out to be his VP, what chance would Tara Reade have? 


😂👆

 

When you have absolutely zero credibility 

 


Yes Leo - Trump is a saint - the POS cheated on EVERY ONE OF HIS wives - including sticking it in Stormy Daniels raw - while Melania is home taking care of new born Barron - and paying Stormy off to hush her up.
 

Oh the credibility with you and Trump is just dripping wet

 

 

 

 

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:


Standard? What other standard matters?


Carroll filed a defamation lawsuit against Mr. Trump in New York for making disparaging comments and branding her a liar after the publication of her memoir. On Oct. 19, the former president was questioned under oath in the case.Jan 13, 2023

 

Why didn’t Tara Reade sue Biden?

 

Why did her story fall apart?

 

After all we know about Trump - paying legal fees for January 6 witnesses - isn’t it ironic the lawyer representing Tara Reade is huge Trump donors?

 

Keep spinning Leo

 

 

My goodness dude, you’re a Neanderthal.  Powerful men uses connections, innuendo and the threat of destruction to silence a victim.  This is nothing new, and backwards thinking folk like you are complicit.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

My goodness dude, you’re a Neanderthal.  Powerful men uses connections, innuendo and the threat of destruction to silence a victim.  This is nothing new, and backwards thinking folk like you are complicit.  


Someone is back pedaling lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:


😂👆

 

When you have absolutely zero credibility 

 


Yes Leo - Trump is a saint - the POS cheated on EVERY ONE OF HIS wives - including sticking it in Stormy Daniels raw - while Melania is home taking care of new born Barron - and paying Stormy off to hush her up.
 

Oh the credibility with you and Trump is just dripping wet

 

 

 

 

Being a saint has nothing to do with it, but I did enjoy the chuckle and the CNN crawl about ::gasp:: vulgar comments.  
 

Biden was off groping  women, is credibly accused of violent assaulting another, and Hillary is perhaps the greatest enabler of sexual predation in American politics.  That’s what these people do. 
 

Fact is, vulgarity isn’t a crime, Trump’s womanizing ways have been well-established for decades and if Melania is cool with it, what’s the problem for you?      It seems like it broke you. 

 


 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Violently what?

 

Please - elaborate “broken”’ one - source 

Thanks, that was supposed to say “violently assaulting a woman”.  I appreciate you pointing that out. 
 

“Please - elaborate “broken” one - source”….reads like a climactic scene in a Jason Bourne movie, but I don’t understand what it means here.  Can you please elaborate? 
 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Thanks, that was supposed to say “violently assaulting a woman”.  I appreciate you pointing that out. 
 

“Please - elaborate “broken” one - source”….reads like a climactic scene in a Jason Bourne movie, but I don’t understand what it means here.  Can you please elaborate? 
 


 

 


More word porn and no source

 

Empty suit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BillStime said:


More word porn and no source

 

Empty suit 

Ok, I see now that “source” is critical to my understanding here.  Thank you. 
 

Please elaborate, broken one. Source! 
 

Please.  Elaborate, broken.  One source? 
 

Please elaborate, broken.  One, source.
 

 

Any way I try and rework these words it comes back gibberish.  It’s like playing Words with Monkeys. If you remember what you actually meant, let me know.  
 

In the meantime, 👨🏻‍🦯

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ok, I see now that “source” is critical to my understanding here.  Thank you. 
 

Please elaborate, broken one. Source! 
 

Please.  Elaborate, broken.  One source? 
 

Please elaborate, broken.  One, source.
 

 

Any way I try and rework these words it comes back gibberish.  It’s like playing Words with Monkeys. If you remember what you actually meant, let me know.  
 

In the meantime, 👨🏻‍🦯


Typical Leo - full of schitt as always:

 

10 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

credibly accused of violent assaulting another

 

Would seem pretty easy to back up something that is so credible, right?

 

fn idiot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BillStime said:


Typical Leo - full of schitt as always:

 

 

Would seem pretty easy to back up something that is so credible, right?

 

fn idiot

You’re going full Deprade these days.  Stay out of the Home Depot brah. 

 

I’ll let the current VP address this.  Is it really a stretch that a guy who fondled women professionally would have these issues? 
 

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/437107-harris-i-believe-biden-accusers/

 

https://news.yahoo.com/sen-kamala-harris-says-believe-181901449.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJh4iQ2sLLQ0cVv0IN4RamsbcpOL1E7BTa6B8BFkhE_wb0T5TvAogSg9KQnSpDofPDavnp_-82GKCztZR3-9OZ5SXEixrEiFXeUqQw26uuIu_KloX9bEzvbiMWUBCbaEodPnBUn66-0B0scSstmtcm2EsEZLCpcEeJBWL1SrlBeL


 

https://nypost.com/2020/08/12/kamala-harris-believed-joe-bidens-accusers-until-she-didnt/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:


No no no no no no - not even close - of all people - you know words matter
 

You said VIOLENT ASSAULT 

 

What does that mean to you?

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d782313840216ecacfa4
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BillStime said:


No no no no no no - not even close - of all people - you know words matter
 

You said VIOLENT ASSAULT 

 

What does that mean to you?

 

giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d782313840216ecacfa4
 

 

 

I don’t think I’m an outlier on the whole “words” thing, but I suppose anything is possible.  You started with this:

 

Violently what?

 

Please - elaborate “broken”’ one - source 

 

I politely clarified and asked for clarity from you.   
 

You proceeded to use phrases like  “word porn”, “empty suit”,  “f’n idiot” and claimed I was “full of schitt”, like you’re off rage-suppressing medication. 
 

Eventually though, with persistence and patience, I was able to empower you to provide clarity, and coax this out of you:

 

 

You said VIOLENT ASSAULT 

 

What does that mean to you?


Why all the hubbub and frostiness when you had to rework your thought process to undue the gibberish?  Say what you mean, mean what you say.  
 

Here’s a link from CNN describing the events alleged to have occurred, which would constitute a violent assault to me:  

 

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/05/02/politics/tara-reade-allegation-joe-biden/index.html

 

I think this is what Kamala was talking about when she said she believed his accusers.  
 

I think, too, that when Joe groped the women he ended up apologizing to, it would be up to each victim to say whether there was a violent “sexual assault” or simply that an assault occurred.   You get into issues over forcible touching, the power dynamic etc. 

 

How would you characterize the allegations against Biden?  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I don’t think I’m an outlier on the whole “words” thing, but I suppose anything is possible.  You started with this:

 

Violently what?

 

Please - elaborate “broken”’ one - source 

 

I politely clarified and asked for clarity from you.   
 

You proceeded to use phrases like  “word porn”, “empty suit”,  “f’n idiot” and claimed I was “full of schitt”, like you’re off rage-suppressing medication. 
 

Eventually though, with persistence and patience, I was able to empower you to provide clarity, and coax this out of you:

 

 

You said VIOLENT ASSAULT 

 

What does that mean to you?


Why all the hubbub and frostiness when you had to rework your thought process to undue the gibberish?  Say what you mean, mean what you say.  
 

Here’s a link from CNN describing the events alleged to have occurred, which would constitute a violent assault to me:  

 

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/05/02/politics/tara-reade-allegation-joe-biden/index.html

 

I think this is what Kamala was talking about when she said she believed his accusers.  
 

I think, too, that when Joe groped the women he ended up apologizing to, it would be up to each victim to say whether there was a violent “sexual assault” or simply that an assault occurred.   You get into issues over forcible touching, the power dynamic etc. 

 

How would you characterize the allegations against Biden?  

 

VIOLENT SEXUAL ASSAULT

 

And none of these women sued Biden for VIOLENT SEXUAL ASSAULT.

 

JFC - you are a freaking joke.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

VIOLENT SEXUAL ASSAULT

 

And none of these women sued Biden for VIOLENT SEXUAL ASSAULT.

 

JFC - you are a freaking joke.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is the second evolution of your original statement which read, profoundly: 

**********

Violently what?

Please - elaborate “broken”’ one - source

***********

 

🤔🤡

50 minutes ago, Wacka said:

Billay is ininfatuated with Trump. Doesn't want anybody nosing into his territory.

BillSy says, and I quote:

 

Please - elaborate - jenga, spelunking- source 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

This is the second evolution of your original statement which read, profoundly: 

**********

Violently what?

Please - elaborate “broken”’ one - source

***********

 

🤔🤡

BillSy says, and I quote:

 

Please - elaborate - jenga, spelunking- source 

 

What a mess

 

15 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

accused of violent assaulting another

 

Still spinning 

 

idiots

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...