Jump to content

Would you make this draft trade?


Bakin

16 for 22 & 54 for CeeDee Lamb?  

30 members have voted

  1. 1. 16 for 22 & 54 for CeeDee Lamb?



Recommended Posts

No


we can get a great WR at 22 (or even 54) this year and a solid player at 54. A great WR class like this means you can get quality WRs later due to high supply.

 

BB has been great making picks so far. Give him more picks, not less.

 

Edited by Nester
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

As much as I love the player, I feel we have too many holes to fill..

I disagree. I don’t think we have many “holes” at all. We need depth at certain positions, but we’re not devoid of talent. WR is a little different because we have our solid #2 and our slot guy. We need a 1.

 

With that said, I think we should stay put at 22 and see who falls. If we go another position at 22 then a trade up in 2 is definitely on the table. Either way, we need to come away with a top receiver in the first 2 rounds. 

Edited by whorlnut
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Nester said:

No


we can get a great WR at 22 (or even 54) this year and a solid player at 54. A great WR class like this means you can get quality WRs later due to high supply.

 

BB has been great making picks so far. Give him more picks, not less.

 

 

...certainly agree......Beane has assembled an impressive staff of 17+ (ALL on Pegula's nickel) to include several former VP's of Player Personnel and Directors of Pro Player Personnel from around the league..safe to say they have done a good job with their homework in the last two drafts......even late or UDFA.......they know their stuff IMO...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure. Lamb is enough to test my "Never trade up" mantra and this trade doesn't seem all that bad.

 

Having said that, the WR class is strong enough that I think I'd lean towards just staying at 22 or trading down. I'd understand if we did pull the trigger though.

Edited by DCOrange
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think no I would not trade up for Lamb.  Pending FA, Bills will have a number of holes to fill including WR, OL, DE, possibly DT.

 

i am all for trying to get top offensive play makers, but I don’t know that Lamb is so good that he justifies trading their 2nd pick for.  
 

Now, if they resign Jordan Phillips and Shaq Lawson and add to the OL in FA, then maybe trading up for a WR is a reasonable plan...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, BigBillsFan said:

 

100% agree on all of those needs. Hey if you're from Schenectady is Mike's Hot Dogs still open? I haven't been there in 14-15 years.

Damn straight...I try to hit it up every few weeks...and the food is just as good as you remember...little extra traffic too, with the casino down the road. ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JaCrispy said:

I think we need starters at WR, RT, SLB, CB, and possibly DE if we can find an upgrade...

WR? Yeah, that’s why we’re trading up.

 

RT? Well we just drafted Cody Ford so I guess you’re expecting a third round rookie to be better than him from the jump? 

 

We need to spend a high draft pick on a SLB who is gonna see the field <50% of snaps? 

 

CB? Were we bad at CB last year? Feel like we have a top 3 CB already and had a great pass defense. We also have a couple quality slot DBs. It’s hardly a desperate need.

 

DE would be nice but it’s hard to draft an impact rookie at that position in the mid rounds.

 

The bottom line is that this team doesn’t have a lot of needs when it comes to the modern NFL. Every team has “needs” that boil down “it’d be nice to have an upgrade.” 

 

We really “need” a WR and maybe a DE and that’s it. Every other position on top of that is just a bonus. 

23 hours ago, OldTimer1960 said:

I think no I would not trade up for Lamb.  Pending FA, Bills will have a number of holes to fill including WR, OL, DE, possibly DT.

 

i am all for trying to get top offensive play makers, but I don’t know that Lamb is so good that he justifies trading their 2nd pick for.  
 

Now, if they resign Jordan Phillips and Shaq Lawson and add to the OL in FA, then maybe trading up for a WR is a reasonable plan...

Possibly DT???! How many DT’s do we need? We have Oliver and Phillips already! Are we really saying we should pass on a day one starter type player at WR because we need a rotational defensive tackle???

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we need at least one go-to target for josh, so if we don't have one or two by then yes. I assume we will have fa"s filling that need by the time the draft rolls around because they will be better targets, knowing where they need to be, the checks, etc. Older guys whose contracts can be removed from the books when we need to pay josh and the other draft picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oof, this is a good question/thread. My general rule of thumb would say no, especially in a draft so deep at WR... but I'm just not sold on Higgins or Shenault.

 

IMO, if we stay at 22 and assume we take Higgins or Shenault there, I'm also hoping the Bills take another WR later, like in the 4th round.

 

So do we spend our 1st and 2nd picks on a top talent, or do we spend our 1st and 4th picks on "lesser" talent, but allow us to get another decent player of need in the 2nd?...

 

Eff it, it's only February, I'm gonna get crazy and say make the trade. Just for Gugnys and Giggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrDawkinstein said:

Oof, this is a good question/thread. My general rule of thumb would say no, especially in a draft so deep at WR... but I'm just not sold on Higgins or Shenault.

 

IMO, if we stay at 22 and assume we take Higgins or Shenault there, I'm also hoping the Bills take another WR later, like in the 4th round.

 

So do we spend our 1st and 2nd picks on a top talent, or do we spend our 1st and 4th picks on "lesser" talent, but allow us to get another decent player of need in the 2nd?...

 

Eff it, it's only February, I'm gonna get crazy and say make the trade. Just for Gugnys and Giggles.

Obviously players bust, but man these 3 have such high ceilings and have produced and improved year over year - hard to see these 3 not working out unless they get stuck on a **** team like Jax or something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Reed83HOF said:

Obviously players bust, but man these 3 have such high ceilings and have produced and improved year over year - hard to see these 3 not working out unless they get stuck on a **** team like Jax or something

 

Who are you referring to by "these 3"? Lamb, Shenault, and Higgins?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

I swore up and down this board for an entire offseason that Von Miller was too small and would be a bust. LOL. But I was right that Cam Newton would not bust. So I guess it's a wash. ?

I coveted JJ that year, but hoped somehow that we would find a way to get Newton - we needed a QB dammit

 

Edit: this is why I like Beane's approach - he fills the holes in FA, follows his board and grades and it wasn't so scatter shot like before trying to plug holes in the draft, which is where you get into trouble

Edited by Reed83HOF
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Reed83HOF said:

top 3 in the draft Lamb Jeudy & Ruggs

 

the other 2 scare me a bit - like Aiyuk better than both of them

 

 

I think Aiyuk is a bit scheme specific. He is a decent fit in Buffalo potentially - playing a sort of Isaiah McKenzie role. He finds good gaps in zone and is a threat every time he has the ball in his hands. If he goes to one of the teams playing what I would call more traditional stretch zone schemes - think Vikings or Packers or Titans - I think he would struggle and get lost in the shuffle. He doesn't demonstrate the ability to separate consistently on tape on the sort of vertical routes you need an X to run and if you just line him up at the Z and ask him to run flats, comebacks and curls I'm not sure that is going to play best to his skillset either. It has to be a team who are willing to use him as an offensive weapon and not worry too much about pigeon holing him into a specific role.

 

I'm still of the view that while he is considerably more raw than the top 3 the guy who is the next most likely to be a #1 receiver in the NFL is Tee Higgins.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure you trade up for a WR.  QB of course and OT or edge.  A WR can be taken out of a game easily.  I would let a WR fall to me in this draft class with the talent level at WR. 

 

As the fail rate is high on WRs and good ones are often low picks/undrafted, I might pick one in 1st and 3rd/4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think Aiyuk is a bit scheme specific. He is a decent fit in Buffalo potentially - playing a sort of Isaiah McKenzie role. He finds good gaps in zone and is a threat every time he has the ball in his hands. If he goes to one of the teams playing what I would call more traditional stretch zone schemes - think Vikings or Packers or Titans - I think he would struggle and get lost in the shuffle. He doesn't demonstrate the ability to separate consistently on tape on the sort of vertical routes you need an X to run and if you just line him up at the Z and ask him to run flats, comebacks and curls I'm not sure that is going to play best to his skillset either. It has to be a team who are willing to use him as an offensive weapon and not worry too much about pigeon holing him into a specific role.

 

I'm still of the view that while he is considerably more raw than the top 3 the guy who is the next most likely to be a #1 receiver in the NFL is Tee Higgins.

 

That's a good point, I have only been looking at players and how they would fit in with us. Part of what is clouding my judgement this year with looking at the incoming class, is how will they contribute to this team this year and make us better by giving us weapons Josh can trust and help us score more points. 

 

Higgins - I just don't like him that much as a prospect - inconsistent drops at times, not great at separation, limited route tree, not great at YAC, not a great route runner, gets dinged up and isn't as physical of a player as he should be. I'm only looking at the negatives (positive - he can make some damn good catches as well) and at pick#22 this causes some levels of concern that I'm not comfortable with the areas he needs to work on at that level of a pick. Obviously, if draft him I will be behind him as a player, but meh - not interested....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think Aiyuk is a bit scheme specific. He is a decent fit in Buffalo potentially - playing a sort of Isaiah McKenzie role. He finds good gaps in zone and is a threat every time he has the ball in his hands. If he goes to one of the teams playing what I would call more traditional stretch zone schemes - think Vikings or Packers or Titans - I think he would struggle and get lost in the shuffle. He doesn't demonstrate the ability to separate consistently on tape on the sort of vertical routes you need an X to run and if you just line him up at the Z and ask him to run flats, comebacks and curls I'm not sure that is going to play best to his skillset either. It has to be a team who are willing to use him as an offensive weapon and not worry too much about pigeon holing him into a specific role.

 

I'm still of the view that while he is considerably more raw than the top 3 the guy who is the next most likely to be a #1 receiver in the NFL is Tee Higgins.

 

So here’s a question a bit off topic here: McKensie is a FA this year, right?  Do you think McKensie is gone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think he is a restricted FA in which case I expect they tender him but I might be wrong. 

 

He is a restricted free agent, but since he was originally drafted in the 5th round, the only RFA tender the Bills can make and get compensation is $2.15M/1 yr 

They can also make him a league minimum offer, but if they do that they get no compensation if someone makes him a bigger offer and I’m not sure he must let them match

 

I admit I find these rules complex and poorly explained, so I hope I have this right.  Here’s an article I found

 

So....what do you think McKenzie is worth?  Should the Bills tender him, if the tender is $2M?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

He is a restricted free agent, but since he was originally drafted in the 5th round, the only RFA tender the Bills can make and get compensation is $2.15M/1 yr 

They can also make him a league minimum offer, but if they do that they get no compensation if someone makes him a bigger offer and I’m not sure he must let them match

 

I admit I find these rules complex and poorly explained, so I hope I have this right.  Here’s an article I found

 

So....what do you think McKenzie is worth?  Should the Bills tender him, if the tender is $2M?

 

I think they will put the lowest tender on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I think they will put the lowest tender on him. 

 

IIRC the lowest tender (1 year vet minimum) does allow them to match any offers he receives

But

We would not get any compensation if we don’t match

 

I could be mistaken about it allowing us the chance to match though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...