KD in CA Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 31 minutes ago, row_33 said: --------------------------- and in comparison to 1986, the revision is made that Jack was a cuddly lovable man, in fact he was a cold machine that was despised by most fans just for who he was and projected, Tom Watson was the people's choice by a million-fold for those duels, Tom broke our hearts on at least 5 major showdowns, even recently... Tiger has come back from the phony shunning he took for his selfish personal choices, there is no bigger bunch of hypocrites than rich golfers... and the injuries he had to fight back from. Good thing he is all about himself and didn't listen to the billions telling him he was through and mocking him the last attempts at comeback. Yup, Palmer early in his career and Watson late were far more beloved during their playing days. But people appreciate greatness and come to love those that have it once they begin to fade. Winning at 46 probably brought Jack more fans than he ever had. But it’s Watson who nearly had a win that would have beaten Jack/Tigers combined in The 2009 Open. That approach on 18 was one hop too long or he wins at age 59. Even in losing that’s one of most incredible feats ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 13 hours ago, shrader said: Choosing to rank them is where we go wrong. Why can’t we just sit back and enjoy them the rare moments when they do happen. As for for the people who can’t enjoy this one, I just feel sorry for them. They missed out on a great moment. But hey, that’s their choice. We can, but it sure makes for compelling conversation around the bar. Talking about them in this way is part of the thrill of what we witnessed. If one can’t enjoy it, well I concur. It’s their choice, but a curmudgeonly one to be sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 33 minutes ago, KD in CA said: Yup, Palmer early in his career and Watson late were far more beloved during their playing days. But people appreciate greatness and come to love those that have it once they begin to fade. Winning at 46 probably brought Jack more fans than he ever had. But it’s Watson who nearly had a win that would have beaten Jack/Tigers combined in The 2009 Open. That approach on 18 was one hop too long or he wins at age 59. Even in losing that’s one of most incredible feats ever. No denying all due love and respect and admiration for Jack's accomplishments and talent, but he's not a nice man, he's still prickly in his old age, but it's Jack! Lots of people in my life won't forgive him still for his work with restricted golf clubs during his career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts