Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 LOL Durbin trying to recharacterize that letter... 1
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 3:28 PM, Deranged Rhino said: "This is all about Hillary's email again!" He's more prescient than he realizes -- but because he's so blisteringly dumb, he fails to see how that's REAL BAD for his side of the aisle. It's his staff (or the committee's dem staff rather) Expand Where'd his staff get the letter? Did Barr just invent a new word: "acknowledgize?" 1 2
BeginnersMind Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 3:27 PM, DC Tom said: Shocking...Durban is quoting a letter that went public less than 24 hours ago to impeach Barr's interpretation of the report. That should narrow down the leak - who's Durban working with? Expand It’s not an OC-length letter. Probably only 3 sentences relevant.
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 3:29 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: LOL Durbin trying to recharacterize that letter... Expand No, he's characterizing the letter exactly as the Post and NYT characterized it.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 3:29 PM, DC Tom said: Where'd his staff get the letter? Expand That's what I'd like to know... I'm sure we will learn that answer in the coming weeks. 2
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 3:30 PM, BeginnersMind said: It’s not an OC-length letter. Probably only 3 sentences relevant. Expand It's the timing, not the content. It's not even a subtle set-up: Post and NYT break the news with a headline, set the narrative, push it in their morning editions, then Durban makes it the focus of his first question. 2
Foxx Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Durbin...'i don't like your response so i'm going to choose to believe...'. 1
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 3:33 PM, Tiberius said: Boom! lol, Those darn emails Expand "We just might do that..." 2 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Dick: "After we take another look at Hillary Clinton's emails" Lindsay: "We might do that" Barr: {grin} LMAO 4
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 None that you are aware of? Oh bull, the Trump Towers meeting before the media reported it was something to hold over the president. His kissing up to Putin is suspicious looking to say the least 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Now Mike Lee is up. He's also pounding the same things, Clinton, FISA warrants, etc. 1
LB3 Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 2:35 PM, Deranged Rhino said: Posting for the image not the meme -- but that was his expression as Feinstein read her (Chinese approved) talking points. Expand Has SNL gotten John Goodman to play Barr yet? 4
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 On 5/1/2019 at 3:37 PM, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Has SNL gotten John Goodman to play Barr yet? Expand Oh, that would be a good one. Same jowls. 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 That was a VERY interesting answer by Barr. He said people assume the only intelligence collection was done by one FISA (on Page) and one informant. He thinks there was more and is looking into it. There was more. It was illegal, Barr knows it. And it's going to come out. 2 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 Barr says he doesn't want to talk too deeply about FISA because of the ongoing OIG investigation. 4 1
Foxx Posted May 1, 2019 Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) On 5/1/2019 at 3:39 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: "FISA issue currently underway by the OIG" Expand the findings can't comes soon enough. break after Whitehouse. good, i'm hungry! Edited May 1, 2019 by Foxx 1
Recommended Posts