Jump to content

Our FAs and Durability


Recommended Posts

A frequent complaint from Bills fans is that our players are more injured/unavailable than those on the other teams. I'm not going to dive into whether or not that's true here, but thought it would be interesting to see if we are targeting players who have a history of durability/availability. Take a look.

 

Mike Tolbert has played (and these will go in reverse chronological order): 16, 16, 8, 16, 16, 15, 15, 16, 13

 

Patrick DiMarco: 16, 16, 16, 14, 5

 

Vlad Ducasse: 10, 16, 13, 16, 16, 16, 2

 

Steven Hauschka: 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 9

 

Jordan Poyer: 6, 14, 16, 3, 9

 

Micah Hyde: 16, 15, 16, 16

 

Philly Brown: 16, 14, 13

 

Ryan Davis: 9, 14, 16, 7, 1

 

Jeremy Butler: 4, 8

 

Jordan Mills: 16, 10, 13, 16

 

Ramon Humber: 16, 14, 15, 16, 13, 13, 3, 2, 16

 

Lorenzo Alexander: 16, 16, 16, 3, 16, 16, 16, 16, 15, 13

 

Not comprehensive, but a lot of 16s. Especially impressive are Tolbert, DiMarco, Hyde, Humber, and Alexander.

Really the only disappointing ones are Poyer, Davis, and Butler - all guys who don't figure to be more than back-ups and role players anyways.

 

How much of a priority do you think durability/availability is to OBD when evaluating potential FAs? Does anything interesting stand out to you?

Edited by JohnBonhamRocks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting post

Yes, I would agree that DW is out there signing alot of very historically durable backup players

That will surely help with regard to having much better depth in 2017 and beyond

However not so much with regard to fielding the best possible 22, lol

Unfort more talent left or was released than we have gained so far

 

jc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...