BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 (edited) But according to their draft they are all gone. By the way where is Braxton Miller slotted to get drafted by Walter Football? QB#21: Braxton Miller, QB, Ohio StateHeight: 6-2. Weight: 215. Projected 40 Time: 4.60. Projected Round (2016): 6-FA. Edited April 13, 2015 by BuffaloHokie13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 QB#21: Braxton Miller, QB, Ohio State Height: 6-2. Weight: 215. Projected 40 Time: 4.60. Projected Round (2016): 6-FA. That 40 time isn't close he runs a sub 4.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 That 40 time isn't close he runs a sub 4.4 Walt's 40 times are always terrible. I take everything on that site with a grain of salt, but his rankings provide a nice counter balance to the NFL and ESPN boards IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 Walt's 40 times are always terrible. I take everything on that site with a grain of salt, but his rankings provide a nice counter balance to the NFL and ESPN boards IMO Yep I don't know where he got 4.6. OSU probably off a bit claiming he runs 4.32 but he will run low 4.4s at the combine. At the end of the day he will be drafted for his overall talent and playmaking ability but whether he will get a chance to compete for a roster spot as a QB all depends on his shoulder and then whether he ever plays qb again in college. Barring injury to one of the other two, I can't see him under center except for gadget plays in 2015 unless he transfers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 I think they go O-Line in the first next year with Cordy about to be on his way out. I certainly hope Cordy is not on his way out......the man is a tremendous football player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section242 Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 I would flip jones with Bosa (if jones plays well enough to go 3rd, he will go 1st due to position). Also Zeke could be the first RB off the board, maybe, but no way a RB goes 8th overall. If he beats out J.T. Barrett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 If he beats out J.T. Barrett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 I don't know how I feel about that statistic because I haven't actually looked into it myself. However, I only have to go as far as Matt Forte, Marshawn Lynch, and Fred Jackson to find evidence that the trend isn't actually accurate. The elite qualifier shouldn't matter, because we are looking for a level of play at 27 that is consistent or improved on their prior years. The Bills are devoting on avg $8 million a year to LeSean McCoy ($5.5, $7.6, $8.8, $8.9, $9.0) for someone they know is going to perform. As for the QB situation, while I agree it may limit our success, the object of his rating was extending a very good RB's contract. I am not sure what the QB situation has to do with this at all. Is it preventing us from signing that free agent QB out there? It is akin to saying "I don't know why he took the shot, they were down 5-3 anyway. Might as well start fresh next game" Well now we are 5-4. I misstated - i was referring to RBs acquired in substantial trades, not all RBs. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 no, I think he will go top 10 but one of the QBs goes first imo sounds about right. I think it is comical that they have Hackenberg and Jones before Cook, who played poorly last year and is just another spread option QB respectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 sounds about right. I think it is comical that they have Hackenberg and Jones before Cook, who played poorly last year and is just another spread option QB respectively. this is Sackenberg's year to show he is worth the hype. Franklin didn't do him any favors with that system and his OL was trash but it's put up or shut up time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 this is Sackenberg's year to show he is worth the hype. Franklin didn't do him any favors with that system and his OL was trash but it's put up or shut up time Hackenberg needs to transfer to a school that plays pro style offense, maybe Nebraska because of mike Riley. Wonder if he can still transfer without sitting out a year because he went through the scandal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Never understood the dislike of passionate, informed amateur creators that occurs on internet chat boards. It stands against reason, in my opinion. The world is a worse place without passionate amateurs contributing to their passion by expressing their opinions in public with the intent of fomenting discussion. Standing on the sidelines and ripping a knowledgeable amateur for actually creating something strikes me as pretty weak -- especially when a person who is doing the ripping hasn't created anything. Walter Football is a fairly solid site, and I've gotten both enjoyment and insight from it over the years. Thanks to the OP for posting the link. I've got plenty of enjoyment out of his site as well, I was just speaking to those getting upset with his projections. Mock drafters are like weathermen. People can follow the weather and know as much or more than the weatherman, the weatherman presents a more professional approach to a wider audience, but arguing about who the Bills are likely to pick at 50 is pretty close to arguing about the 10 day forecast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 I've got plenty of enjoyment out of his site as well, I was just speaking to those getting upset with his projections. Mock drafters are like weathermen. People can follow the weather and know as much or more than the weatherman, the weatherman presents a more professional approach to a wider audience, but arguing about who the Bills are likely to pick at 50 is pretty close to arguing about the 10 day forecast. Fair point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts