Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

CIVIL RIGHTS UPDATE:

 

 

Women for Gun Rights Takes The Fight To Washington D.C.

Darwin Nercesian 

 

Women for Gun Rights (WGR), a pro-Second Amendment organization formerly known as The DC Project, has taken its fight to the capital, with representatives from over 40 states descending on Washington, D.C., to advocate on behalf of what is arguably the fastest-growing demographic of gun owners in America: women. 

 

WGR refers to these events as “Fly-Ins,” and this particular Fly-In, which took place on June 22, was the most successful to date, according to the group. The event looked nothing like the rabid, masked, sloppy, violence-ridden “mostly peaceful protests” from the left, however, as these proud patriots came with a focused and cogent agenda. That plan included equipping women to lead in the fight for their rights through a comprehensive training conference meant to empower them with the clarity, credibility, and confidence necessary to effectively advocate for the God-given liberty recognized and enshrined in the United States Constitution. 

 

The conference, rooted in education rather than setting fires and looting, covered Second Amendment history, legislation, and major court rulings that have shaped the gun rights landscape into what it is today. It also included training in how to communicate effectively with those who have yet to become familiar with firearm ownership, and lessons on digital advocacy, enabling them to combat the rampant misinformation spread by politicians, the media, and the sycophantic sheep who can’t bother to take part in civil discourse and would rather be marched into their own demise like well trained cattle. 

 

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/women-for-gun-rights-takes-the-fight-to-washington-d-c/

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Nothing about the victims who lost their lives.  Just the victims of this whole "gun control" thing.  Sick, sad, and on-brand for the B-man. 

Posted
5 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Nothing about the victims who lost their lives.  Just the victims of this whole "gun control" thing.  Sick, sad, and on-brand for the B-man. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
6 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

Nothing about the victims who lost their lives.  Just the victims of this whole "gun control" thing.  Sick, sad, and on-brand for the B-man. 


After the Colorado attack your words of comfort were:

 

On 6/2/2025 at 8:12 AM, SectionC3 said:

This is not good.  But it's not nearly as bad as J6, which a lot of the hysterical MAGA here seem to have forgotten about. 

Nice work. You’ve certainly got the high ground!

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JDHillFan said:


After the Colorado attack your words of comfort were:

 

Nice work. You’ve certainly got the high ground!

I'm glad you can keep all of the mass shootings in this country straight.  I can't.  I can justify the 2A on secular grounds.  I can't do it on religious grounds.  Put down the sword, taught Jesus.  Buy an AR-15 with a velocity rate that no civilian needs, say the fake Christians around here.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

I'm glad you can keep all of the mass shootings in this country straight.  I can't.  I can justify the 2A on secular grounds.  I can't do it on religious grounds.  Put down the sword, taught Jesus.  Buy an AR-15 with a velocity rate that no civilian needs, say the fake Christians around here.  

How do you judge the horrific NYC crime? Worse than J6 or not as bad as J6?  Based on your posts that seems to be your criteria. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

How do you judge the horrific NYC crime? Worse than J6 or not as bad as J6?  Based on your posts that seems to be your criteria. 

Shouldn't you be more concerned with the Epstein coverup?  In the meantime, if I thought your question was sincere or that you actually cared about either of those terrible incidents, then I'd think about it.  

Posted
27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Shouldn't you be more concerned with the Epstein coverup?  In the meantime, if I thought your question was sincere or that you actually cared about either of those terrible incidents, then I'd think about it.  

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 7/29/2025 at 11:38 PM, SectionC3 said:

All those who draw the sword will die by the sword. 

So you think all the gangbangers should just be shot immediately? You are much harder than I am but ok.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

So you think all the gangbangers should just be shot immediately? You are much harder than I am but ok.

I was trying to think of how to to explain to you how you're wrong about this, but then I remembered that you aren't very smart and that I'd have better luck teaching a chicken about gravity than I would trying to help you with this one. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

I was trying to think of how to to explain to you how you're wrong about this, 

 

Well that explains it.

 

.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

I was trying to think of how to to explain to you how you're wrong about this, but then I remembered that you aren't very smart and that I'd have better luck teaching a chicken about gravity than I would trying to help you with this one. 

You make an inane comment, when questioned you admit you can't explain it intelligently. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said:

You make an inane comment, when questioned you admit you can't explain it intelligently. 

It's a reference to the Gospel of Matthew and Jesus's teaching of peace.  Apparently that's what you define as inane. 

×
×
  • Create New...