B-Man Posted July 8 Posted July 8 CIVIL RIGHTS UPDATE: Women for Gun Rights Takes The Fight To Washington D.C. Darwin Nercesian Women for Gun Rights (WGR), a pro-Second Amendment organization formerly known as The DC Project, has taken its fight to the capital, with representatives from over 40 states descending on Washington, D.C., to advocate on behalf of what is arguably the fastest-growing demographic of gun owners in America: women. WGR refers to these events as “Fly-Ins,” and this particular Fly-In, which took place on June 22, was the most successful to date, according to the group. The event looked nothing like the rabid, masked, sloppy, violence-ridden “mostly peaceful protests” from the left, however, as these proud patriots came with a focused and cogent agenda. That plan included equipping women to lead in the fight for their rights through a comprehensive training conference meant to empower them with the clarity, credibility, and confidence necessary to effectively advocate for the God-given liberty recognized and enshrined in the United States Constitution. The conference, rooted in education rather than setting fires and looting, covered Second Amendment history, legislation, and major court rulings that have shaped the gun rights landscape into what it is today. It also included training in how to communicate effectively with those who have yet to become familiar with firearm ownership, and lessons on digital advocacy, enabling them to combat the rampant misinformation spread by politicians, the media, and the sycophantic sheep who can’t bother to take part in civil discourse and would rather be marched into their own demise like well trained cattle. https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/women-for-gun-rights-takes-the-fight-to-washington-d-c/
SectionC3 Posted Wednesday at 03:38 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:38 AM Just now, B-Man said: Reminder: . All those who draw the sword will die by the sword.
SectionC3 Posted Wednesday at 03:47 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:47 AM 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: Nothing about the victims who lost their lives. Just the victims of this whole "gun control" thing. Sick, sad, and on-brand for the B-man.
Wolfgang Posted Wednesday at 09:02 AM Posted Wednesday at 09:02 AM 5 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Nothing about the victims who lost their lives. Just the victims of this whole "gun control" thing. Sick, sad, and on-brand for the B-man.
JDHillFan Posted Wednesday at 10:04 AM Posted Wednesday at 10:04 AM 6 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Nothing about the victims who lost their lives. Just the victims of this whole "gun control" thing. Sick, sad, and on-brand for the B-man. After the Colorado attack your words of comfort were: On 6/2/2025 at 8:12 AM, SectionC3 said: This is not good. But it's not nearly as bad as J6, which a lot of the hysterical MAGA here seem to have forgotten about. Nice work. You’ve certainly got the high ground! 1
SectionC3 Posted Wednesday at 11:16 AM Posted Wednesday at 11:16 AM 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said: After the Colorado attack your words of comfort were: Nice work. You’ve certainly got the high ground! I'm glad you can keep all of the mass shootings in this country straight. I can't. I can justify the 2A on secular grounds. I can't do it on religious grounds. Put down the sword, taught Jesus. Buy an AR-15 with a velocity rate that no civilian needs, say the fake Christians around here.
JDHillFan Posted Wednesday at 11:21 AM Posted Wednesday at 11:21 AM 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: I'm glad you can keep all of the mass shootings in this country straight. I can't. I can justify the 2A on secular grounds. I can't do it on religious grounds. Put down the sword, taught Jesus. Buy an AR-15 with a velocity rate that no civilian needs, say the fake Christians around here. How do you judge the horrific NYC crime? Worse than J6 or not as bad as J6? Based on your posts that seems to be your criteria.
SectionC3 Posted Wednesday at 11:36 AM Posted Wednesday at 11:36 AM 14 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: How do you judge the horrific NYC crime? Worse than J6 or not as bad as J6? Based on your posts that seems to be your criteria. Shouldn't you be more concerned with the Epstein coverup? In the meantime, if I thought your question was sincere or that you actually cared about either of those terrible incidents, then I'd think about it.
Wolfgang Posted Wednesday at 12:04 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:04 PM 27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Shouldn't you be more concerned with the Epstein coverup? In the meantime, if I thought your question was sincere or that you actually cared about either of those terrible incidents, then I'd think about it. 2 1
Recommended Posts