PromoTheRobot Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=....800&print=true PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 I'd bet they did a lot of testing in Alaska. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JP-era Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 I'd bet they did a lot of testing in Alaska. 206356[/snapback] Or the secret testing bases in San Fran and Provincetown on Cape Cod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Or the secret testing bases in San Fran and Provincetown on Cape Cod 206358[/snapback] I think that one went over your head there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Yeah, I never did trust the "Penatagon." First it's salt peter, now this! Where will it end - with foxes in the foxholes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HtownBillsFan Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 I saw something about this last nite on TV. They also had chemical weapons that would give you horrible breath and would make you easier to find. Chemicals that combined with the sun would burn your skin. Scary sh--, but they say they were just ideas, nothing ever became of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JP-era Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 I saw something about this last nite on TV. They also had chemical weapons that would give you horrible breath and would make you easier to find. Chemicals that combined with the sun would burn your skin. Scary sh--, but they say they were just ideas, nothing ever became of them 206376[/snapback] Uhh Huhh, sure, just ideas never tested, look into the Dugway proving grounds. check this site out: http://www.aliendave.com/Chemtrails.html Obviously mostly garbage but some of this could very well have legs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snorom Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 I saw something about this last nite on TV. They also had chemical weapons that would give you horrible breath and would make you easier to find. Chemicals that combined with the sun would burn your skin. Scary sh--, but they say they were just ideas, nothing ever became of them 206376[/snapback] The fact the we are even having these ideas shows us how repulsive the powers that be are, in this country or others. Agent orange, anthrax and who knows what else has been developed in the name of "freedom" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says "Those close to the experiment said it was first tested in late 2000 in the suburbs of Boston, where the Pentagon opted to stop production of the weapon once they realized all of the people affected by the chemical found themselves oddly congregating at Gillette Field every Sunday. Patriots owner Bob Kraft says he doesn't care less why all the rumprangers were at his stadium. Says Kraft: "At least people are finally showing up." "Pentagon officials confirm that the best way to make everyone leave the stadium is to have the Patriots start losing again. Sources close to the Pentagon report: "Nothing makes a Pats fan stop attending the stadium like a loss or two." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HtownBillsFan Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 "Those close to the experiment said it was first tested in late 2000 in the suburbs of Boston, where the Pentagon opted to stop production of the weapon once they realized all of the people affected by the chemical found themselves oddly congregating at Gillette Field every Sunday. Patriots owner Bob Kraft says he doesn't care less why all the rumprangers were at his stadium. Says Kraft: "At least people are finally showing up." "Pentagon officials confirm that the best way to make everyone leave the stadium is to have the Patriots start losing again. Sources close to the Pentagon report: "Nothing makes a Pats fan stop attending the stadium like a loss or two." 206413[/snapback] Hilarious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 "Those close to the experiment said it was first tested in late 2000 in the suburbs of Boston, where the Pentagon opted to stop production of the weapon once they realized all of the people affected by the chemical found themselves oddly congregating at Gillette Field every Sunday. Patriots owner Bob Kraft says he doesn't care less why all the rumprangers were at his stadium. Says Kraft: "At least people are finally showing up." "Pentagon officials confirm that the best way to make everyone leave the stadium is to have the Patriots start losing again. Sources close to the Pentagon report: "Nothing makes a Pats fan stop attending the stadium like a loss or two." 206413[/snapback] I thought the "gay bomb" was when Tom Brady threw the ball downfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 HOLY COW!! They have the technology to do stuff like that?? I just can't believe it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Some believe the Pentagon contracted with a biotech company to produce AIDS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 I'd bet they did a lot of testing in Alaska. 206356[/snapback] Air Force was involved weren't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 I wonder which category that one fell into? Harassing, annoying or 'bad guy'-identifying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Sounds like something out of one of the 60's Matt Helm movies. I can picture Dean Martin tip toeing through embracing gay evil enemies to a escape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnzane Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 I'd bet they did a lot of testing in Alaska. 206356[/snapback] that would exp;ain why alaska darin is so cranky j/k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerJ Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 I suppose on one hand you could argue that a "gay bomb" or a "halitosis" weapon would be more humane than mustard gas or Sarin. And I further suppose that when a military think tank gets together and talks about weapons, the nature of brainstorming suggests that no idea is too ridiculous, but some things are just too sick to seriously suggest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Bone Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 You have to wonder, if the Pentagon believed that the right chemical mixture would result in uncontrollable homosexual behavior than they must believe that homosexuality is not a choice but biological driven. And if that is the case, then the case against gay rights really does not hold water since those opposed claim it is a choice and not due to biology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts