DC Tom Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 He wouldn't have to be behind in the polls, he could be up in a close race. Look at Obama's Perpetual Motion Presidential Campaign right now. They're ahead albeit by a small amount, but they're still throwing every peanut filled turd they can find at Romney As to the method of the October surprise, could be anything from Sabre Rattling towards Iran to announcing a new round of drone attacks to eliminate those big bad terrorists in a far off land, to an Imperial Presidential Executive Order pandering to some key voting bloc It's really embarrassing to be this close after campaigning for four years... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 It's really embarrassing to be this close after campaigning for four years... 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 29, 2012 Share Posted August 29, 2012 6 He wasn't campaigning for the first two, he was merely present. (Note to MSNBC: by "present", I don't mean anything racist.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 He wasn't campaigning for the first two, he was merely present. (Note to MSNBC: by "present", I don't mean anything racist.) Still, you thought enough to create the note...which makes you a racist. -------------------- I can't believe we got this far in this thread....with no mention of what the http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/82325501/ ahem, lizard people are going to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosmicBills Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Still, you thought enough to create the note...which makes you a racist. -------------------- I can't believe we got this far in this thread....with no mention of what the http://www.ebaumswor...watch/82325501/ ahem, lizard people are going to do? Way ahead of you... False Flag Alien invasion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Still, you thought enough to create the note...which makes you a racist. -------------------- I can't believe we got this far in this thread....with no mention of what the http://www.ebaumswor...watch/82325501/ ahem, lizard people are going to do? Holy ****. Obama's Egyptian? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 He wasn't campaigning for the first two, he was merely present. (Note to MSNBC: by "present", I don't mean anything racist.) A new one to add to the list Tom.........................................Chicago Chris Matthews and MSNBC Now Claim the Word 'Chicago' Is Racist But tonight's episode of race-baiting with Chris Matthews was a bit odd in that the panelists somehow came to the conclusion that reminding people of the President's roots in Chicago politics is racist. In fact, simply saying Chicago is racist http://newsbusters.o...t#ixzz252XE7DZR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 So when I tell people that my wife is from Chicago what am I saying exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 So when I tell people that my wife is from Chicago what am I saying exactly? A. She was smart and moved. 2. She is on the lam for embezzlement. D. She isn't a racist. 5. She is a racist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 A. She was smart and moved. 2. She is on the lam for embezzlement. D. She isn't a racist. 5. She is a racist She beat out Queen Latifah for an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 How many lies will Romney and Ryan tell to get elected? RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 How many lies will Romney and Ryan tell to get elected? RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT !!! Can we get a list of these lies or has Axelrod not yet tweeted the actual lies just pointing out the fact that they're lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 (edited) Can we get a list of these lies or has Axelrod not yet tweeted the actual lies just pointing out the fact that they're lying. the word around the water cooler at the WH is that they are lying. Edited August 30, 2012 by Gary M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Can we get a list of these lies or has Axelrod not yet tweeted the actual lies just pointing out the fact that they're lying. Again you assume I say the Dems are innocent. I have never said that. The purpose of the convention is to select the party's nominee for President, as well as to adopt a statement of party principles and goals known as the platform and adopt the rules for the party's activities, including the presidential nominating process for the next election cycle. So how did the GOP convention turn into what sounded like a bunch of angry drunks ragging on Obama? And YES, if the Dems follow suit I will reiterate the same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 And YES, if the Dems follow suit I will reiterate the same thing. No, you won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Please list the Axelrod lies and we can discull them. And not from a right leaning blog, or the totally fake FosNation either. An accusation is not a lie. Is Obama anti Israel? --- Jul 27, 2012 – From Yahoo! News: President Barack Obama said Friday he is releasing an additional $70 million in military aid for Israel Is Obama really a muslim? or a terrorists friend? Just ask BinAHole and the other dozen plus dead Terrorist leaders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 A few more for the Racist list: New frontiers in hypersensitivity: State Department officer says ‘holding down the fort’ is racist John M. Robinson, the Chief Diversity Officer at the U.S. Department of State, wants America’s diplomats to know that common phrases and idioms like “holding down the fort” are, in fact, deeply racist. Robinson, who also serves as director of the Department’s Office of Civil Rights, used his “Diversity Notes” feature in the July/August issue of the official “State Magazine” to examine the hateful roots of everyday sayings. In one recent public relations kerfuffle at Nike, Inc., he wrote, the company torpedoed a sneaker called the “Black and Tan.” “What a wonderful celebratory gesture and appreciation for Irish culture. Not!” wrote Robinson, an adult. Robinson notes that “Black and Tan,” in addition to being an enjoyably robust alcoholic concoction, can refer to the brutal Protestant militiamen who ravaged the Irish countryside in the early 20th century — which is why Irish bartenders always get so upset when you order one. In an effort to avoid offending those notoriously fragile Irish sensibilities, Nike pulled the shoe from stores.Robinson would like us all to learn from the sneaker company’s inadvertent racism and really start watching what we say. For example, did you know “going Dutch” is a reference to Netherlanders’ apparently well-known parsimoniousness, and that your widowed neighbor, sweet old Mrs. Rasmussen, cries every time she hears you use it? And did you know using the phrase “holding down the fort” is the linguistic equivalent of scalping a Cherokee? According to Robinson, the phrase dates back to American soldiers on the western frontier who wanted to “hold down” all that land they stole. “Handicap” and “rule of thumb” are two more figures of speech that Robsinon, in his wisdom, has decreed offensive. The latter, Robinson says, refers to the width of a stick a man could once use to legally beat his wife. And in case you’re wondering how he could have done all the etymological detective work necessary to conclude that these phrases came from where he says they came from, and still have time to perform his Chief Diversity Officer duties at the State Department, wonder no more: Robinson doesn’t really know if any of this is true. “Much has been written about whether the etymologies below are true or merely folklore, but this isn’t about their historical validity,” Robinson writes. “nstead, it is an opportunity to remember that our choice of wording affects our professional environment.” Duly noted, Mr. Robinson. http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/30/new-frontiers-in-hypersensitvity-state-department-officer-says-holding-down-the-fort-is-racist/#ixzz253NDU5fa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 Oh Tom you joker Ryan reportedly recalled this event incorrectly just days ago, during an August 16 speech in Ohio that Obama said he'd "keep that plant open," and therefore broke his promise because the plant closed. "That plant was shut down in 2009. I remember President Obama visiting it when he was first running, saying he'll keep that plant open," Ryan said, according to the Janesville Gazette. "One more broken promise." The Detroit News pointed out that Obama made no such promise in the February 13, 2008, speech, and indeed, we've seen no account suggesting that Obama did. Here is the quote at issue, according to an account kept by the Council on Foreign Relations: a flasification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 30, 2012 Share Posted August 30, 2012 A few more for the Racist list: New frontiers in hypersensitivity: State Department officer says ‘holding down the fort’ is racist John M. Robinson, the Chief Diversity Officer at the U.S. Department of State, wants America’s diplomats to know that common phrases and idioms like “holding down the fort” are, in fact, deeply racist. Robinson, who also serves as director of the Department’s Office of Civil Rights, used his “Diversity Notes” feature in the July/August issue of the official “State Magazine” to examine the hateful roots of everyday sayings. In one recent public relations kerfuffle at Nike, Inc., he wrote, the company torpedoed a sneaker called the “Black and Tan.” “What a wonderful celebratory gesture and appreciation for Irish culture. Not!” wrote Robinson, an adult. Robinson notes that “Black and Tan,” in addition to being an enjoyably robust alcoholic concoction, can refer to the brutal Protestant militiamen who ravaged the Irish countryside in the early 20th century — which is why Irish bartenders always get so upset when you order one. In an effort to avoid offending those notoriously fragile Irish sensibilities, Nike pulled the shoe from stores.Robinson would like us all to learn from the sneaker company’s inadvertent racism and really start watching what we say. For example, did you know “going Dutch” is a reference to Netherlanders’ apparently well-known parsimoniousness, and that your widowed neighbor, sweet old Mrs. Rasmussen, cries every time she hears you use it? And did you know using the phrase “holding down the fort” is the linguistic equivalent of scalping a Cherokee? According to Robinson, the phrase dates back to American soldiers on the western frontier who wanted to “hold down” all that land they stole. “Handicap” and “rule of thumb” are two more figures of speech that Robsinon, in his wisdom, has decreed offensive. The latter, Robinson says, refers to the width of a stick a man could once use to legally beat his wife. And in case you’re wondering how he could have done all the etymological detective work necessary to conclude that these phrases came from where he says they came from, and still have time to perform his Chief Diversity Officer duties at the State Department, wonder no more: Robinson doesn’t really know if any of this is true. “Much has been written about whether the etymologies below are true or merely folklore, but this isn’t about their historical validity,” Robinson writes. “nstead, it is an opportunity to remember that our choice of wording affects our professional environment.” Duly noted, Mr. Robinson. http://dailycaller.c.../#ixzz253NDU5fa First of all the is officially out of control and second why does the US Department of State have a Chief Diversity Officer and how much are we paying him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted August 30, 2012 Author Share Posted August 30, 2012 Clearly electing a race baiting black president the media covers for has done wonders for race relations in this country Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts