NastyMan Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 The Colts take Luck The Skins take RG3 The Dolphins sign Manning The Browns sign Fynn or The Colts take Luck The Skins take RG3 The Broncos sign Manning and trade Tebow to either the Dolphins (putting butts in the seats and I think the Fins like to run the ball more anyway) or the Browns (could use a spark and can see them doing this since they can't get one of the top two in this draft) The Browns or Dolphins (whoever losses out on tebow) sign Flynn If either of these two scenarios happens (I think the first is more likely), do you think the Bills would take Tannehill in the second if he falls to them? I would go for it, because the way Nix is signing our own free agents, I really think he will be aggressive this free agent period, signing a stud at (DE, WR, or LB probably two of the three) and using the first pick to fill a major need with whatever they don't sign picking or a LT. I would love to see that happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Just say no to Tannehill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NastyMan Posted March 10, 2012 Author Share Posted March 10, 2012 The Colts take Luck The Skins take RG3 The Dolphins sign Manning The Browns sign Fynn or The Colts take Luck The Skins take RG3 The Broncos sign Manning and trade Tebow to either the Dolphins (putting butts in the seats and I think the Fins like to run the ball more anyway) or the Browns (could use a spark and can see them doing this since they can't get one of the top two in this draft) The Browns or Dolphins (whoever losses out on tebow) sign Flynn If either of these two scenarios happens (I think the first is more likely), do you think the Bills would take Tannehill in the second if he falls to them? I would go for it, because the way Nix is signing our own free agents, I really think he will be aggressive this free agent period, signing a stud at (DE, WR, or LB probably two of the three) and using the first pick to fill a major need with whatever they don't sign picking or a LT. I would love to see that happen. Sorry guys I didn't proof read chang this "I really think he will be aggressive this free agent period, signing a stud at (DE, WR, or LB probably two of the three) and using the first pick to fill a major need with whatever they don't sign picking or a LT." to read "I really think he will be aggressive this free agen tperiod, signing a stud at (DE, WR, or LB probably two of the three) and using the first pick to fill a major need with whatver they don't sing or picking a LT." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjmac Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 The Colts take Luck The Skins take RG3 The Dolphins sign Manning The Browns sign Fynn or The Colts take Luck The Skins take RG3 The Broncos sign Manning and trade Tebow to either the Dolphins (putting butts in the seats and I think the Fins like to run the ball more anyway) or the Browns (could use a spark and can see them doing this since they can't get one of the top two in this draft) The Browns or Dolphins (whoever losses out on tebow) sign Flynn If either of these two scenarios happens (I think the first is more likely), do you think the Bills would take Tannehill in the second if he falls to them? I would go for it, because the way Nix is signing our own free agents, I really think he will be aggressive this free agent period, signing a stud at (DE, WR, or LB probably two of the three) and using the first pick to fill a major need with whatever they don't sign picking or a LT. I would love to see that happen. We have way too many issues to consider a QB before day 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NastyMan Posted March 10, 2012 Author Share Posted March 10, 2012 Just say no to Tannehill I am sorry for liking Tannehill. I think he is smart, tall, athletic, can read defense real well, throws a pretty ball, and we can use him right away (maybe not as a QB but as a WR). Who cares if he has small hands, a lot of guys in the NFL do, he is just a football player to me and will do whatever the coaches ask him to do to make the team better. Plus he was in a very similiar offense while at Texas A&M that the Bills run now. Can make the short throws and even the long ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjt328 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 Tannehill has been flying up the draft boards. It's becoming more unlikely that he makes it out of the first round. He'll get a lot of consideration from Cleveland at #4 or #22, Miami at #8 and Seattle at #12. I sure hope the Bills aren't considering him. I think he has talent to be a starter in the NFL... just not a very good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NastyMan Posted March 10, 2012 Author Share Posted March 10, 2012 We have way too many issues to consider a QB before day 3. I don't know if you have been watching the NFL lately, but you need a QB to win in this league.... And the Qb we have in Buffalo is a great guy and a good filler and back-up don't get me wrong but he is not the QB of the future.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjmac Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I don't know if you have been watching the NFL lately, but you need a QB to win in this league.... And the Qb we have in Buffalo is a great guy and a good filler and back-up don't get me wrong but he is not the QB of the future.... The first thing you do is build up the talent around the QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26TrapDraw Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 We have way too many issues to consider a QB before day 3. + 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 We should draft a QB this year later round solid project. But i agree that this is not the year to hang it out there for a qb. I hope we all know that Ryan is old enough that we should be finding his apprentice fairly soon. I've forgotten. what happened to levi? I bet we are already seriously scouting the next two years rising of college Quarterbacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 So scenarios should affect more what we do on DEFENSE rather then offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 (edited) I am sorry for liking Tannehill. I think he is smart, tall, athletic, can read defense real well, throws a pretty ball, and we can use him right away (maybe not as a QB but as a WR). Who cares if he has small hands, a lot of guys in the NFL do, he is just a football player to me and will do whatever the coaches ask him to do to make the team better. Plus he was in a very similiar offense while at Texas A&M that the Bills run now. Can make the short throws and even the long ones. I watched 5 games of Tannehill, at least, this past season and for every good throw comes a throw that makes you say "wth was he thinking". Decent arm? Yes. Athletic? Used to be a WR, yes. Tall? Yes. Can read the defense well? Uhhhh, not really. Just say no to Tannehill. He will get drafted higher than he should and is no better than a career back-up. Edited March 10, 2012 by H2o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 The Colts take Luck The Skins take RG3 The Dolphins sign Manning The Browns sign Fynn or The Colts take Luck The Skins take RG3 The Broncos sign Manning and trade Tebow to either the Dolphins (putting butts in the seats and I think the Fins like to run the ball more anyway) or the Browns (could use a spark and can see them doing this since they can't get one of the top two in this draft) The Browns or Dolphins (whoever losses out on tebow) sign Flynn If either of these two scenarios happens (I think the first is more likely), do you think the Bills would take Tannehill in the second if he falls to them? I would go for it, because the way Nix is signing our own free agents, I really think he will be aggressive this free agent period, signing a stud at (DE, WR, or LB probably two of the three) and using the first pick to fill a major need with whatever they don't sign picking or a LT. I would love to see that happen. I'd rather take Dennis Dixon of the Steelers when FA opens. He'll be a good backup, and fits in well to Chan's system. or Marvin from Wisconsin in the 4th. Either way, we MUST get a QB. We don't have a legit #2, and who knows if Fitz can actually last an entire season after his late-season meltdown where he couldn't throw the ball downfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2o Posted March 10, 2012 Share Posted March 10, 2012 I'd rather take Dennis Dixon of the Steelers when FA opens. He'll be a good backup, and fits in well to Chan's system. or Marvin from Wisconsin in the 4th. Either way, we MUST get a QB. We don't have a legit #2, and who knows if Fitz can actually last an entire season after his late-season meltdown where he couldn't throw the ball downfield. Russell Wilson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Just say no to Tannehill Who wants an elite QB? I am sorry for liking Tannehill. I think he is smart, tall, athletic, can read defense real well, throws a pretty ball, and we can use him right away (maybe not as a QB but as a WR). Who cares if he has small hands, a lot of guys in the NFL do, he is just a football player to me and will do whatever the coaches ask him to do to make the team better. Plus he was in a very similiar offense while at Texas A&M that the Bills run now. Can make the short throws and even the long ones. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts