Captain Caveman Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 So he was waitng for a bus at 7:15 AM after he gets off work and get smashed into by dante because he wasnt in the crosswalk. Does Expressways have crosswalks or bus stops? plus isnt a crosswalk where you cross the street? http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4033632 I think we're getting into semantics, but he was trying to run across a 6 lane road (without the benefit of a traffic light or crosswalk.) He wasn't waiting for a bus. He was running across a six-lane causeway, trying to catch a bus. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacArthur_Causeway They said he wasn't in a crosswalk (they didn't actually say there was a crosswalk.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 No I understand the INTENT of it, But for people to say "Mike's killings of dogs were worst than killing a human" is absurd. Yes mike had a thought out plan and dante's was mor accidental I get that. But you can't say with a straight face if somebody put a gun to your fathers head and your dogs head you'd pick your dog. They were both wrong yes nobody can denie that but to choose between a humans life and a dogs shouldn't even be debatable thats all im saying. Sure it would be absurd if people were saying that. But they are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 No I understand the INTENT of it, But for people to say "Mike's killings of dogs were worst than killing a human" is absurd. Yes mike had a thought out plan and dante's was mor accidental I get that. But you can't say with a straight face if somebody put a gun to your fathers head and your dogs head you'd pick your dog. They were both wrong yes nobody can denie that but to choose between a humans life and a dogs shouldn't even be debatable thats all im saying. So he was waitng for a bus at 7:15 AM after he gets off work and get smashed into by dante because he wasnt in the crosswalk. Does Expressways have crosswalks or bus stops? plus isnt a crosswalk where you cross the street? http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4033632 this matter has nothing to do with humans and dogs but comparing vick to stallworth. vick's behavior shows that he does not value any life but stallworth's behavior shows that he does value life even putting others before him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Philster Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Not a single person has ever said that killing dogs was worse than killing people...anyone accusing people of saying that should show proof of it or shut the hell up...dishonesty is a disgusting character trait and to debate using nothing but false accusations is pathetic Sure it would be absurd if people were saying that. But they are not. don't confuse him with facts...if you can't put words in his mouth, you can't debate with him apparently This is probably someone who was banned in the past or else forgot his login info...probably due to all the drugs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 You guys have got to be kidding me? Since when was it ok to drive drunk and KILL A PERSON? You can't ever say that killing a dog is worst than killing a HUMAN. Im in shock that this is even debatable. You guys should have your heads examined as soon as possible. There are so many excuses (oh he said sorry, oh he wasnt really that drunk, he could have gotten off but he chose to go to jail and pay a fine *DOES THAT EVEN MAKE SENSE?*). I really feel sorry for you guys. He killed him on the street not expressway..SMH...Not Saying what mike did wasnt completly dumb BECAUSE IT WAS FAR BEYOND DUMB! But making a debate over killing dogs and a human is retarded. Id rather have my father than cujo if I couldnt have both but thats just me. (WATCH SOME D*CKFACE TAKE THAT LAST LINE THE WRONG WAY)... 5,4,3,2,1.... everything you stated as fact is wrong. you are absolutely out of your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleaky72 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 You pathetic mutt loving bugger eaters are pathetic and stupid! keep snuggling to your furry, crotch sniffing four-legged droolers, while ur fellow human beings starve, suffer and are run over by drunken millionaires. What a bunch of pathetic bleeding hearts some of you apes are I hope I find one of your mutts and go Mike Vick on them! Idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beebe's Kid Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Why do you have to compare the two? The incidents are completely different outside of the fact they were both illegal. It sounds like many are sympathizing with Stallworth, which is laughable. I bet if it was one of your family that was hit by him, you would feel differently. Just curious how many of you sticking up for Stallworth were ready to send Lynch to the electric chair when a drunk broad walked into his car? To try to justify what Stallworth did, because you may find yourself in the same situation, still doesn't make it right. He was over the legal limit..."just over," who gives a !@#$? There is a reason there is a legal limit, and his judgment was impaired, and now there is somebody dead. "The guy wasn't at a cross walk..." or whatever justifications you have are moot. If any of us did this, you are getting charged and going to jail...I believe it is 3 years mandatory in PA, not sure about NY. Vick's crime was cold, calculated, and lasted an extremely long time. I am sure they partook in this for a long time, and he only got involved deeper by financing with his asinine $ from the Falcons. It wasn't a past crime, and he would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids. To think that he was slapped on the wrist by Goodell is disgusting. There doesn't have to be a "winner" between these two situations....they were both wrong, and both got off way easier than you or I would have, because they can play football. They really contribute nothing to society other than the ability to throw and catch a ball...in fact I would judge both as a detriment. I am all for rehabilitation. I am sure Stallworth was sorry, most human beings would be after they killed somebody. I hope he uses this to turn his life around, and hopefully helps others along the way. This goes through my head every day... I watch people drive in 25 MPH areas at 50, people are constantly driving aggressively, they never stop at stop signs, and are in just a general hurry all of the time. That is awesome, right up until somebody gets killed and you have to live with it for the rest of your life, and even worse so does their loved ones. I always keep in mind how I would feel if my kids didn't come home because somebody couldn't be bothered with stopping at a light, and I slow down. I think about how I might feel if I had to have nightmares about seeing somebody that I t-boned dead in a car with their kids crying, because I was too special for a stop sign, and I slow down. That doesn't make me immune, or perfect, but it lowers my risk, substantially. At the end of the day, taking a side with either of these two because the other's crime was "worse" is interesting, and sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts