Jump to content

Fezmid

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,348
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fezmid

  1. Very cool, good news to hear indeed. I've got a friend who is on the shuttle team, so she's pretty psyched now too. I'm expecting her to send some really cool pictures from the launch and I'll ask if I can post them somewhere if people are itnerested (no promises though). CW
  2. I want to make some Pad Thai this week, but I've never made it myself - only eaten it at restaraunts. Anyone have a good recipe they use? If so, post it here (or on the TSW Cookbook page). I've found a ton of different ones online, but no way of knowing if they're any good... CW
  3. Today's a company holiday for me. Even better, I'm not on-call, so I really AM away from work! CW
  4. For people who roast Bledsoe's sacks and fumbles, you'd think you'd be able to do the same for Culpepper. In 81 games, he has 81 fumbles and 36 lost, for an average of 1/game, and .444/game lost. Bledsoe's average is only .638/game, and .298/game lost. Top that off with the fact that the Vikes had a MUCH better OL than the Dolphins do, and I think you're looking at some bad play for the Phins. I hope I'm right CW
  5. Not sure how many people remember Green Jello, but I enjoyed it and figured at least one other person will as well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6KSrBD52ms...h=green%20jelly
  6. Your link was too short, and would be hard for the older people on the wall to be able to click on - they'd have to be too accurate with their mouse.
  7. Never heard of it, but sounds cool. http://bs.brokensaints.com/dvd/ CW
  8. Yeah, the Bucs were terrible right up until 2002. 1997 - 10-6 1998 - 8-8 1999 - 11-5 2000 - 10-6 2001 - 9-7 2002 - 12-4 CW
  9. Do you seriously want to continue on public record putting words in my mouth? I never said he was good. I said he could've been decent if he stayed healthy -- look at some of the games he played, like against KC. Again, no other QB in the Bucs entire HISTORY had won a game against a team when it was less than 40 degrees. Was he the main reason they won? No. Did he help them win? Definately. But I realize he's on the TSW "Bash" list so no matter what he does/did, people will find fault. When players like that are on our team, it's "We lost because of player X," and "We won despite player X." So carry on. CW
  10. I'd still say no, because he didn't play long enough. He had three great seasons, and then the injury killed him (not literally ). That's just not a big enough body of work, IMHO, to be inducted in the HoF. CW
  11. Which was more than could be said for any other Bucs QB in their entire history. I've noticed that people on this board love to dismiss everything from players on their "bash" list.
  12. You're forgetting the fact that the Bucs had NEVER beaten a team when the temp was less than 40 -- and the Bears, Packers, etc were BAD for a long time. There was a major brain lock for that team playing in the cold. That's worth something.
  13. I'd say neither gets in. Look at it this way -- Thurman isn't in, why would TD be allowed in.
  14. You want to just send me the $50 check now and save yourself the agony? Heck, I won't even post in any more DB threads if you do CW
  15. You, my friend, must've been drunk during all of Tampa's games and blacked it all out: 2002: Played in 6 games with 2 starts for the Super Bowl champion Buccaneers…Tampa Bay won games in which he started… http://www.giants.com/team/player.asp?player_id=243 In addition, Johnson won Tampa's first ever game against a team when the temperature was below 40 degrees. http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/recap/NFL_20021229_TB@CHI Winning that game secured a first round bye and home field for the team. While the defense played lights out, Johnson did lead them to 5 scores (3 good drives) and no picks. If he didn't get hurt every other play, I think he would've turned out to be a decent QB. CW
  16. Yes, actually I did: http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=47958 CW
  17. Can you back up ANY of this tripe? No
  18. One could counter that Davis won those Superbowls, not Elway. How many Superbowls did Elway lose without TD in the backfield? Just playing 's advocate. CW
  19. Huh? Nearly half of Bledsoe's career covered the same years as Elway (including some of his biggest years). So using that logic, Bledsoe's rating should be considered and 82 or 83. You do realize that this entire paragraph describes Bledsoe as well, right? CW
  20. John Elway has a 79 rating. Hard to argue against him being in the Hall, but his QB rating sucks. Further reason that the QB rating is (IMHO) worthless. CW
  21. What about someone with a QB rating of 79 (as opposed to Bledsoe's 77). Does a 79 deserve to be in the HoF?
  22. It's a sad day indeed when the police and mayor complain that they have to follow the law... http://www.northjersey.com/page.php?qstr=e...2Y3dnFlZUVFeXkz
  23. Pretty funny (and true) stuff: http://www.joystiq.com/2006/06/22/jon-stew...ds-video-games/
  24. You only like the service when she reads you your spam email, don't you? "Hey baby, enlarge your unit today - take v14gr4 and grow your penis!" CW
  25. They're called "BW3" now -- shorthand for "Buffalo Wild Wings and Weck," which is ironic since, as you noted, they don't have Weck anymore... Their wings can be good from time to time, but nowhere near as good as back home CW
×
×
  • Create New...