Much like Obama, you just can't understand his message.
What he keeps saying, isn't what he's saying.
So even though he keeps bringing up Bush, and he keeps bringing up Iraq, and even though he keeps mentioning that Obama has inherited a bad global image of the US, and even though he's said that the poor perception of the US by the rest of the work has limited Obama' options in dealing with Russia, and even though he's said that therefore this mess is partly Bush's fault, none of that is really what he's saying.
This is on top of all the actual facts of the current situation and the process leading up to it over the past several years that have already been mentioned in this thread and in some cases pointed out specifically to him.