I'm not suggesting anyone needs the procedure done.
I'm not advocating that we mandate something like an ultrasound.
My point was to Buftex that the ultrasound law is more geared towards diagnosing the health of the fetus than that of the mother. Basically echoing the point of the legislation isn't to cover women's health.
So if the legislation isn't about women's health, why bring up a new law concerning men's health and say they're equivalent? It's an apples and oranges argument that he's not understanding.