No, I don't know you. Where did I claim to know you? I took issue with your summary judgment of others' in what seemed to be a very condescending manner, as if there isn't a plethora of people on this board with a plethora of different opinions and approaches to being Bills' fans. You have one approach, no more right or wrong than any other. You do not hold the keys to the kingdom. Perhaps I attribute more condenscention to your posts than you intend, and if that is the case, then I apologize.
Cool.
Good for you. Yet you assume others, such as myself, do blindly follow because they do not completely agree with your criticism, i.e. your opinion. You smugly say "You don't know me" yet you are very willing to turn around and pigeon hole me as being a certain kind of fan.
Yes, I understand your opinion. There are others, however, and they do not necessarily correlate with your own or fit into the two stark categories of "Your opinion" and "Blind Faith".
Let's look at my initial post:
Please tell me where in the above three sentences I state that "to be a diehard fan you must simply backup your teams decisions and go with the ride". You assume that I must be saying that because I take issue with the way you express your opinion. When I said "It's called being a diehard fan", that was referring to the majority of fans who don't feel the need to deconstruct the Bills maneuvers like you do with such fervor. They're just fans and of course have their opinions but do not wear it as a badge of honor that they ridicule the "ridiculous" decisions made by the Bills. You seem to put great stock in your opinion and its ability to slice through to "the truth" of the matter. That is certainly your prerogative, but it borders on hypocrisy to say "you don't know me" and then judge me or others by putting words in our mouths and labelling us as something or another.
I rest my case.