todd

I can respect that!

And so you are expecting a rookie in the first game of the year to provide that spark? Isn't it a little early in the morning to be drinking?

I watched all of Mike Williams' games when he was a rookie. He was friggin AWESOME!

None. Zero. You can't ever plan on a draft pick contributing in their first year, let alone their first few games.

Yeah, right. Ever hear of Mike Williams? He was a rookie starter and he was AWESOME! Any fan who thinks they can predict performance of a rookie is smoking crack. Starting rookies isn't a recipe for winning. Suggesting that it is - pure stupidity.

So you are suggesting that the entire left side of our offensive line is filled with inexperienced rookies? Are you insane or just crazy? Do you actually want the Bills to succeed? Stupid notion.

It would be a total dumbass move to trade Peters for just draft picks. You don't just replace LTs. It doesn't happen, and if Buffalo doesn't get a player or two for him they obviously aren't going to improve this year. Anyone who thinks a draft pick will have an impact in their first two years is smoking dope.

No, but I'd delete this post if I could.

Stupid. Posting with misleading subjects is so yesterday.

Can't wait for your 4th post!

I listen all the time. When I want listen to stupidity for a bit, I switch over to Lonsberry for 10 minutes. That usually does the job.

So disgusting pig Wilfork is OK to lunge after Losman's legs and nobody in the NFL blinks an eye. Someone does it to wittle tommy bwady who plays for the New England Cheaters & Liars, and there's a rule change. I hate New England. They can suck my butt.

The 40 time is irrelevant for TEs. Very few TEs ever run a route that takes them 40 yards. Apparently this guy is a sick blocker, has good hands, and can get off jams. That's what you want from your TE, especially if you have good WRs. And now that Buffalo has 2 good WRs, Pettigrew could be a good pick. Of course, the Bills have so many needs besides TE, I could see them going defense in the first two rounds and not drafting a TE until the 3rd or 4th.

If I had to guess, that would be 10mil after rookie salaries. Which might be accurate considering that sheet doesn't have owens on it yet, and his contract all counts to the cash to cap calculation.

And if he does, he'll deserve it. We've needed a QB that could do that for a while.

Friggin meathead. I hate him. I hate Donahoe for letting it happen.

That's great. But he's a rookie and will be a detriment to the offensive line if we want to win this year.

Okay, so you aren't dim enough to expect a draft pick to produce like an experienced player in their 1st year, right? Not only that, you do realize that any draft pick is a risk and liability, right? You do realize that we'd basically have ZERO confidence on our QB's blind side, right? Trading peters is an idea for the bored or stupid.

It would take more than draft picks. Buffalo needs to perform this year, and any rookie is a liability. Two 1st round picks is more expensive than signing Peters to an extended contract, not to mention the cost of replacing him. I think it would be a totally stupid move to trade him, and too expensive and risky to be worth it. Especially considering the spot next to him is empty as well. Why don't people see this? This is all I'd take: 2 1st rounders this year Brodrick Bunkley Omar Gaither Nothing less.

Any Bills fan who wants to win this year shouldn't really be advocating trading Peters for any amount of draft picks. Draft picks rarely have a positive impact in the first year, and not only that there's no guarantee that they will pan out at all. As a matter of fact, playing a rookie is usually a liability. Why would someone want to introduce another liability, when this upcoming year is critical when it comes to making the playoffs?

Canty - should have at least tried. The Jets TE that went to NE. Not only that, there have been plenty of rumors about players available for trade. There's three, which I'm sure you'll attempt to refute just because it would make you wrong if you didn't. My point is that it is clear the Bills aren't seriously attacking FA or trades. If you can't see that, I don't know how the obvious eludes you.

Seems as if you don't have a better solution, either. If you're cool with the continued suckitude, just admit it. So we either overpay for players like everyone else, or refuse and continue to lose. Sounds like fun!

Well, that's the market. If you want the players, you've gotta pay them. I guess the alternative is continued mediocrity. Is that acceptable to you? Do you have another solution that will get them to at least 10 wins this year? Their current path won't do it. Believe me, I hear where you are coming from. Paying these players that kind of cash is tough. But how the hell do the Bills win next year if they don't? How do they get the starters and the depth to compete?

There's only ONE legit pass rusher in that group, and that is Schobel. That won't cut it.

Generate excitement? How, by having a farting contest? Only a fuggin moron would think a draft pick would make an impact in their first year. You can't depend on that. And you can only realistically expect to replace ONE starter with your entire draft class, and the Bills need new starters on O-line, d-line, WR, TE, and LB. Are they even close to addressing that fact? No.