Taro T

Again, project much?

Based upon the 1st bolded sentence, your second bolded raises the question: project much?

Honestly not sure of the origin of that accusation. Do know that when somebody would post news that another trafficking ring got broken up or additional information about Epstein & his crew, Gary would typically post something designed to elicit a response from DR.

Absolutely not. And not condoning the accusation. But, there is a history between the 2. And one of them is on at least his 4th incarnation here and has a penchant for starting threads and then deleting them. Was merely trying to clarify that Gary was embellishing once again.

Pretty sure you were the only person around here whom he accused of that.

Cool. Had exactly 3 currently active posters on Ignore & 2 were on your list. Great minds ..., or something to that effect. Thanks.

SDS, thanks for the explanation. Still don't believe banning DR was the correct decision, but this is your board & respect the decision. (Also, very saddened that you & yours are having so many health issues, I do hope they all get overcome & will say a prayer for you all.) Definitely don't want to add to the consternation this place has been causing you, but do want to point out one item. The vast majority of the people celebrating your decision (& running to you and the mods about DR & likely others) are people that openly call for the removal of this board. It's interesting & sad that the people who don't like this board can't abide their own advice and simply stay away. But rather they want to destroy this because they don't like it. Anyway, thank you again for hosting this site & SS. We are your guests here & most of us do appreciate that we are in fact your guests & need to play by the house rules.

Am really surprised by this tweet. Good for her actually being decent.

PiP.

Was going to give the post the "awesome" emoji, but then got to the part that you're quitting this place. Hope you reconsider leaving; you're a good poster. Maybe when all the lockdowns have subsided you'll come back. Hope so.

Would explain 45 venting his spleen at the last campaign stop. He'd know if they're actually ready to start handing out indictments. And as big of a jerk he tends to be at times, until the last batch of Flynn releases & the Ratcliffe letter to Graham he's been really pretty much silent on how the IC community hosed him & his campaign. He's been pretty good at only making accusations that are about to be proven true. So, hoping that's the case here. But will believe it when we see it.

More like female versions of Rob Reiner. At least DeNiro has talent.

If everything were on the up & up, do expect 45 to be reelected. But absolutely don't doubt that at minimum Nevada & PA will be stolen. WI (which my expectation would go 45 after Kenosha) & MN (which actually might go 45 in a fair election) will have shenanigans as well. It only takes a couple more like AZ and pretty soon, the former VP "wins."

Do these ####ing morons HONESTLY believe that 55's position condemning these hate groups is something he's flipped away from? How many ####ing times will be enough? And, for the love of all that's good & holy, can just 1 of them ask the former VP to condemn Antifa & other anarchist & communist sympathizing groups with at least 1/10th the fervor that they chase 45 on the flip side of the issue?

100%. But, speaking of Gregory, who was awful as the moderator on MtP, he's the guy that had Pelosi say the Catholic Church has no position on when life begins AND that natural gas is not a fossil fuel. Too bad he didn't follow up on either as her explanations would've been doozies.

The day Tim Russert died so, pretty much, did mainstream journalism. And it's frustrating as heck as politicians are forced to come up with better ideas when their idiocy is exposed. And the morons in the mainstream press don't realize that by scrutinizing ALL politicians, we all win. It's great that they come after Republicans hard. We'd all be better off if they came after Democrats at least 3/4's as hard. And if they'd only twist conservatives words 20% more often than they do liberals, we'd be better off as well.

Is English not your 1st language? There is a WIDE gap between not being a feminist & being submissive. You honestly don't see the contradiction between her being "submissive" and rising to a position of power that fewer than 0.000004% of American women have risen to? Assuming she is confirmed, she will be exactly the FIFTH woman EVER on the US Supreme Court.

Seriously? You are claiming a woman who very likely will become only the 5th woman in history to be on the Supreme Court believes women are "expected to live in 'total submission'?" Care to explain how this "submissive" woman rose to that level living the "submissive" life she apparently espouses?

Wtf is the angry emoji for this one? Absolutely awful that this SOB will lie so bald faced. Still have a copy of the order he gave. He can & will lie; hopefully people continue to call him out on that.

You don't honestly expect a follow up question, do you?

That makes the question even more annoying then. The response to that question and the response to the question about opposing "corporate racial sensitivity training" (aka the Marxist program of CRT) were the 2 biggest hits 45 took IMHO, because although he was on the right side of both issues he didn't come close to saying what he needed to say & for anyone watching that was getting their 1st exposure to these questions would hear pretty much the opposite of what 45 meant. Yes, he said "sure" a couple of times, which meant yes he disavows them & has done so repeatedly in the past, but it APPEARED like he didn't really want to do so. And that, IMHO, was because he wanted to talk about Antifa & couldn't keep the 2 thoughts fully clear & separate from his brain to his mouth.

Would agree w/ this. But, make no mistake, Biden showed 8 years ago that he'd have been talking over 45 whether 45 was playing nice or playing himself. My take is still that neither won the debate (it's hard to win a debate when you can't articulate complete thoughts & neither man can) but 45 might have lost it. Though getting Biden to tacitly admit he'll stack the SC if he can and (paraphrasing here) that Antifa is an idea and not an organization (try telling that to people who had their businesses burned down) were a couple of solid body blows.

Not disagreeing at all. But did you find the former Vice President calling the current President "a clown" and talking over him presidential or entertaining?

Can't believe it went over well w/ Pelosi, Shumer, or 44 either.

But causing alarm among Democrat strategists only 11% percent of those requesting mail-in ballots were deceased. Said one anonymous strategist "if we've lost the dead, you can put a nail in our campaign's chances."