Jump to content

Doc

Community Member
  • Posts

    65,793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Doc

  1. It's brown-on-browm crime. Doesn't count...
  2. Yeah, it's not the $220B the EU has given Russia since the war started...
  3. Just saw this. That's hilarious. And he didn't drop anything. The award separated from the base. Talk about poor quality. Need to save some of that NIL money for trophies I guess.
  4. Canada has even less of a chance at hacking into Signal...
  5. Signal is a secure app. The plans were never in any danger of being intercepted. What it can't do is prevent human error like (someone in Waltz's orbit) accidentally adding a reporter or (allegedly) discussing classified information with family members. The latter still needs to be proven and if it did, it shouldn't have happened and shouldn't happen again. But there's no grounds for firing.
  6. If the EU listens to this nobody, they're in more trouble than anyone thought.
  7. And everyone's told you can't take classified material/home with you when you leave office. Yet...
  8. Nothing new. Been around a ton of Philipino nurses during my career. Speaking of which, you know how you say "FU" in Tagalog? "Yes doctor."
  9. Yes. What's most important is not sharing your soon-to-fail plans with others... If he texted classified info to people he shouldn't have, it's wrong and shouldn't happen again. Jumping to "HE NEEDS TO BE FIRED!" is silly considering you didn't GAF about the previous SecDef going AWOL 3 times, which is a far bigger issue.
  10. Nope. I highlighted the part about your liberal friend. And I was wondering who this friend of yours that's closing trillion dollar deals is.
  11. How you guys can (still) believe anything from the Dems or MSM after hidin' Biden's mental decline I'll never understand.
  12. So? Still a douche.
  13. No. If tariffs are even between countries it has nothing to do with China. An example I heard was Vance trying to get India to not buy energy from China. Not sure how accurate that was but that would be targeting China.
  14. No, not at all. Unless we're starting new wars with them. Which as far as I know we're not planning on doing.
  15. Reducing tariffs between the US and other countries doesn't target China.
  16. Good luck with celibacy!
  17. What were they waiting for? It's not like China suddenly became a threat.
  18. And the last Admin didn't? You think Mayor Pete was qualified to be Secretary of Transportation?
  19. I rarely see movies based on who is in them. If it's a good movie, I'll watch it.
  20. Yeah, it sounded bad initially. Basically China will be targeting any country that makes a deal with the US to screw them over and not just balance trade/tariffs. And that's fair.
×
×
  • Create New...