Vinny4sum

My favorite part is how the Bills failed to address the the QB position and they get a bad grade. The Dolphins get a better grade and I would argue they have a bigger need at QB than the Bills. td int yds rat Fitzy in 13 games 23 15 3000 81.8 Henne in 14 games 15 19 3301 75.4 Bucky mailed it in.

I have no dought you can pull off the Zubaz look

That is so right! I was watching the draft and reading TBD after the Williams pick, whom I wanted, when I screamed out loud my frustration with this board. My wife's response was "These are the same people we see in the parking lot that still think they look good in their Zubaz!"

I watched the ESPN draft re-cap today with Mcshay, Kiper, Bruschi and Edwards. They smell it too!! McShay said " Bills had a great draft maybe 4 starters drafted." Bruschi said, "The Bills started to close the gap with other AFC East teams, no more looking at the Bills on the schedule and seeing a sure win."

The picks they made convey a feeling of security from Buddy and Chan. They didn't reach to try to hit a home run. These picks look to me like just step one. For example, Johnny White the RB is a pick for depth, but also the first in line to ultimately replace Freddy in 2-3 years and there will be more RBs to eventually find the replacement. I guess what we feel, even the people not overly happy with all the picks, is the sense of a plan.

So do I!

Take Ziemba from Auburn and Stocker in the 4th.

They can do all of it..but it all violates the HIPAA laws..where the aw starts and stops are the people necessary in providing care; such as doc, doc office staff, payers etc. The docs wife or friend that doc is in violation..cleared to play is OK...exact issue is not.

That release is for shared health information, not public release of information.

Unless the player signs a waiver..NO ONE can discuss his medical without the threat of breaking the law.

We need a corner..i voted for harris, but I want them to select Aaron Williams from Texas..

You are correct, but they will trade it with someone that wants him...

Polian also got House Ballard in like the 10th or 11th round.

The key to all the scenarios is Newton being drafted at #1.

Completely unrelated to this topic, but look at the rankings and please explain why Newton over Gabbert? It's not only Scout's, but the majority of rankings are like this, but everyone says Newton to Carolina..I don't get it, I know there "may" be a greater upside with Newton, but that is a gamble at #1 or #3..don't these ramkings mean that Gabbert is less of a reach at he top of the draft? I mean at CB Peterson is clear #1, but there is less gap between him and Prince the #2 rated CB than at QB, but you don't hear Prince taken before Peterson.. Am I just trying to make sense of something that doesn't make sense?

If the Bills go defense at #3 and want a QB at #34 the Patriots* phone will be ringing off the hook for the #33 pick. If Buddy is correct and there is a run on QBs in the first round there may be a very short supply of 2nd round value QB's available and everyone will be trying to jump our pick. This scenario scares me for 2 reasons; first it means Pats* get great value for this pick and second if I am thinking this so are the Bills so they either jump back into round one which is costly or they grab a QB at #3 and I am not sure either QB is worth #3.

I agree...I find it very hard to believe the Bills or any team for that matter has Newton ahead of Gabbert...for that reason I believe that if Miller and Dareus are gone the Bills turn to Gabbert...last night on NFLN Casserly said the Bills will not go QB in rnd. 1 because they can get an immediate starter on defense with the 3rd pick and I prefer that approach vs. taking Gabbert. miller, dareus or peterson one of them has to be available.

Relax..trading back into the 1st round was Donahoe "Splash" move!! Nix and team value picks and have confidence they can find the right player in round 2.

Is this because Mayock didn't agree with you? Because the draft has not happened, so where does the the egg on face come from?

Lock up your daughters!!

I have had mine for 2 years and it works great..it is an RF remote and actually works while not pointed at receiver. You have to change the remote setting in setup to RF and some of the older receivers had a spot to add an RF antenna.

Funny I share in my companies PROFIT not revenue. Because I contribute to their ability to make a profit, but I also play a part in their expenses. Maybe the owners do not want to share the books, because they do not want the line details to become public or there are individual organizations that are struggling and that would weaken them. I have a huge problem with the word revenue, because it is meaningless to organization stability. Yes increasing is always good, unless your expenses increased more. The point of this argument is future earnings and the players want to see the past 10 years, they are meaningless in todays world of increased exepneses for travel, facilities and health care. What the owners are looking for is a partner in potential increased expenses going forward, not just revenue. So, the agreement should be a percent of profit and the books will determine each years payout (or cap). It's not hard if both sides want to be honest with each other.

I know if I intended on drafting a franchise QB in round 1 I would fully evaluate all potential options. The difference being I would take the one I want you to think I am drafting to dinner very publicly the night before his pro day. The one I am leaning toward I would be meeting with via site visit to Buffalo and low key meetings at pro day.

For the same reason they came out flat in a huge game they will start to crack this year. Ryan's emotional leadership is great for a while, but eventually that starts to backfire and the AFC championship game may have been the first sign. They have a lot of talent, but they are who we thought they are!

The players want the small markets, because bottom line for them is more teams to bid on their services and more NFLPA members. That is why the players like teams sharing revenue.