Meathead

three words: fry. station. engineer.

he plays for the mean machine now

why would they? they are hoping to get him to restructure and be one of the competitors for the job. it would be stupid to commit anything to him until he agrees to restructure. and its smart to try and keep him in the mix bc its going to cost far more to release him just to pay another 3-4 mil to get someone at his level ive already told you whats gonna happen - fitz redoes his deal, wins the job to start the season, makes way for a tjax trial when the team is dropping games like darcy dropping lindys, and finally the rookie they drafted will finish out the string in yet another lost season deal wid it

thats what i was trying to say but apparently didnt do a very good job. byrd should realize he has less leverage than levitre bc he plays at a position that is harder to replace, so he should be aware the bills are certain to franchise him if he doesnt sign. in that case, theres really no reason for him to not get down to business and just get the contract done. most players dont like being in limbo so he might instruct his agent to just get on with it thats pretty iffy though and he might not mind just sitting back and letting it unfold. if thats the case then yeah the bills likely lose the oppty to put similar pressure on levitre. thats why ive said since the middle of last season its most likely that we are going to lose levitre. if they cant franchise him i just dont think its a good idea to overpay at this time and they should let him cash in huge with somebody else

hopefully they can sign one of their two big fas before needing to use a tag, then they can use the tag as leverage against the other one to make a deal. players dont like the tags bc they are at risk to losing their long term payday to injury, which is why a deal almost always gets done before or soon after it is used. but if they cant get one signed before then, somebody is going to walk and thats most likely cialis

lmao yeah! im a meatrosexual

if by decent you mean getting repeatedly smoked for long touchdowns that would make leodis look like a hofer then yeah he was decent

at first i thought the jetsons dog was making nfl draft predictions

i already admitted im partially gay. not sexually but culturally. orange creme vodka and pink shirts. im ok with the feminine side of my masculinity what did they call it on southpark? metrosexual, that was it. im metrosexual

with the lindy firing i think now is not a good time to see if this can get any attention on wgr. i think ill wait a week or so than consider it again, so get your nominees in if you have any. i also think ill send it to shopp and the bd instead of howard, better chance of it getting mentioned

besides, i thought i got those convictions sealed

oh i see now, you are trying to make the point that republicans did not try to hinder the voting of segments of the population that were likely to vote democratic thats like asking me to provide sources for evidence smoking causes cancer youre either ignoring the reality on purpose or youre just plain ignorant. go look it up yourself if its the latter, that information is out there ive told you many times, i dont play your stupid partisan gotcha games. you can call me anything you want, im immune to those kinds of taunts. im going to keep representing truth as i see it and respond to intelligent differences of opinion only. if i dont respond to you, well you can figure out why yeah i blanked out there for a minute. i blame the new bottle of orange cream vodka. and obama

lmao youre a dick but i gotta admit youre funny

yeah i saw that. but i dont understand why they didnt provide a lot more detail about the reports that those stories were untrue that existed at the time. i suppose those fbi agents that had the data and were trying to get it to the president probably dont want to risk ending up with dick cheney sized cement shoes, but even if they didnt interview those guys they still could have tried to provide some new perspectives on that unless that series of events has been effectively debunked, which i dont know how i could have missed, i thought that was a huge factor. it told me that the executive branch had made it clear they didnt want any dissention on this topic and tacitly encouraged underlings to block any info that would dispute the stories they were telling based on faulty data. when we are talking about taking a country to war, killing millions and spending trillions, yeah thats pretty huge

lmao. what in the hell are you talking about. if this is a joke i dont get it. and if its not a joke youve either got the wrong guy or theres something seriously wrong with you

oh bloviate me

well i dont think any company should have the patent on seeds forever but they need to have some way to recoup their investment and make money. they could handle it like perscription drugs, have so many years that the patent is exclusive, then allow other companies to produce the same product perhaps under some license agreement for a few more years the question of cross polination is interesting. if a patented product naturally cross breeds with another farm i wonder how they handle that. same thing for the question on damages to existing crops, idk

id rather have dwight yoakam

and the fat, balding, loser bart simpson at that

youre white arent you. then youre a racist

i dont even understand the farmers point if the crops he grows come from seeds engineered and licensed by monstanto then he should owe the company money what difference does it make where he got the seeds? if a monsanto truck crashed on his property and the seeds grew on their own does he then own them forever? if a flock of birds eat seeds from a hundred miles away and poop them onto his property where they grow does he own them forever? perhaps im missing something but if a company owns a patent on an engineered product then they own that product no matter how or where it creates a plant. if that wasnt the case, then companies would simply stop spending r&d to create those innovations bc it would just get stolen by every tom dick and harry with a shovel and a pickup

lmao. priceless

ive never had a problem with requiring ids for voting. its the shenanigans republicans have been pulling with last minute law changes, closing polling places, and reducing early voting that disgust me. thankfully that crap backfired on their immoral asses as it just pissed people off and drove many to vote for obama despite being dissatisfied with him reminder: i didnt vote for obama, i dont think he deserved another term on his own merit, i voted for the only sane republican. but i am extremely glad the voters bitchslapped the republicans for those very unamerican dirty tricks. serves the douchbags right im a supporter of gun rights. but i still dont have any problem with reducing clip sizes, restricting access to the more dangerous weapons that make it easier to conduct mass killings, or increasing the registration requirements. we have a serious problem with gun violence in this country and if it takes more steps for us to get our guns in order to provide audit trails that helps track down illegal gun usage im all for it lets face it, weve historically had it too easy. i realize its uncomfortable to give up something that weve always had, but super easy access to guns is part of the problem. we wont be able to stop criminals from getting and using their guns illegally, but at least we can make it harder for them to use legit guns and get away with it. im ok with giving up some easy access to get that done

yeah i really am clueless bc i honestly have no idea what youre talking about i support gun ownership. i have a handgun permit (tho i dont own a handgun). i used to go hunting and loved things like target practice im a registered independant, ive voted for a republican the last two presidential elections, so this isnt about politics for me and i literally have no idea what your beef is on this sounds like simple partisan temper tantrums to me, but if somebody wants to try to make a cogent point i will listen you want reliable useful home protection, get a shotgun. so whats the problem

you kids get off my lawn