Jump to content

stinky finger

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,886
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stinky finger

  1. The fact that I've seen them both play, my opinion is that Volek could handle a starting job. Nothing more than watching them both play. That's it. I can't give you the "X's and O's ", just that I think Volek would a fine job from week 1-16. Holcomb being the perfect backup. I wouldn't call you ignorant for that.
  2. Why don't you start a poll asking that very question? That was an awfully arrogant statement. Please, feel free to disagree with someone, just get over yourself. It's akin to everyone agreeing with every post you've ever made. Or are you as brilliant as you make yourself out to be?
  3. Is it that you can't stand a varied opinion, or is it that you think JP is that terriffic? It's just a different view. Don't get so uptight about it. It's not that important.
  4. We're on the the same page. I'd love to fortify our OL and bring in a Billy Volek type. I don't care that JP was selected in the first round. That means nothing. IMO, I just don't get "that" good feeling about JP. Obviously, others do and that's fine. We can, and I'm certain we will, throw him into a competition and he might win it. If it's possible, I'd rather go with someone more established so we can hit the ground running. Just a different philosophy. That's all.
  5. Who cares where he was drafted? I'll take Fitz and a 2nd rounder and go with Holcomb. We'll fortify ourselves elsewhere. Hell put the right OL in place and then go get me Collins. The Raiders are bound to part ways with him.
  6. Sorry, my man.........couldn't resist....all in good fun.
  7. OOOOOK........but aren't you being a little hardon yourself?
  8. Who said Fitz had to replace JP as the starter? Grab a valuable extra 3rd rounder (or who knows...possibly 2nd is what I'd be asking) and play Holcomb, who I anticipate being better next year anyway. We've got options. The more I think of it, the more I like it. Guess I'm just not as sold on JP as many are.
  9. Oh right, he wasn't drafted so he couldn't possibly get any better. Considering this kid had virtually no preperation time, I'm not so sure he couldn't be adequate with the right OL and a coach already familiar with him. You don't have to like the proposal, but don't discount it because the kid wasn't drafted. Unless you see some unsubstantiated upside with JP, I would CONSIDER it. I'm not one that thinks JP is the "end-all" with or without the proper OL. All I know is that with the way this team sits, another #3 this year would look awfully good.
  10. I like what I saw from him in spot duty last year. He's certainly smart enough, Harvard I believe. Add a 3rd in this particular draft you propose, and I could be swayed. Though, I'm not sure why St Louis would do this.
  11. It's the Denver OL as a whole that is good. I think it's more the system than the player. Bring over the whole unit and now you're talkin'.
  12. Agreed. I think White will be the best workhorse of the group coming out. Teams interested in him will want to move up right around #8.
  13. Ooooooo.....you were doing so well until you mentioned Reed. I don't recall our OL slapping the ball out of his hands.
  14. I voted Childress because I wanted the HC to have more of an offensive influence, but none of these guys jumps out at me. I'm more interested in learning who our coordinators will be. Minus Payton and McCarthy, we could have hired any of them and then predicate my opinion, not just on the HC hiring, but on the staff as a whole.
  15. Bea Arthur. I just adore a gravely voice blue hair with her mouth apparently locked in a rather prone position.
  16. I believe there is. Wade Phillips......the fact that he looks like Bob Newhart with a hyperactive thyroid is troubling, but I'd go back to him over DJ anyday.
  17. "DICK!!..........Jauron my Dick....get off, man!!"
  18. Oh my lord.......he's a balding pedophile.....HEAD coach, indeed.
  19. Maybe it's smarter. Maybe not. My philosophy differs in that I'd rather have the stud OL that would enhance the game of a "lesser" RB. As opposed to say.....WM and ....well......you get the point. Certainly more than one way to skin a cat, I guess.
  20. Exactly. Why would a Shi$$y team, that has needs everywhere, start with the OL? Doesn't make sense.
  21. Bank on it. I like Saunders. What's not to like? Lets see.....Gibbs HC...Williams and Saunders as OC and DC. NICE STAFF!
  22. Jauron....front runner.....he's being reported as the front runner.
  23. Which, in turn, would make him the highest paid coach in sports history.
  24. Tails it is..........as the front runner, anyways. So says their flashboy.
×
×
  • Create New...