Chilly

Rich bumped Bart's thread, so obviously I need to reply to this one.

While he is a pretty good guard from Texas, I'm really making this post just to spite Bart.

Works fine for me in Firefox. Ed, the Wambulance is a classic intarweb concept. Not surprising that you do not know it.

Dumbass? It works fine when I click on it.

Quick, que someone up with a Vince Young comment.

My biggest fear would have to be meazza.

Depends on the player. I think Dockery's done well in the NFL, and the jury is still out on Scott. Davis was a Mackovic recruit and didn't spend a ton of time with the current staff. Williams and Davis were before McWhorter started coaching the O-line here, and I think Dockery's success is attributed in a large part to him.

Next he'll start trying to talk about how your football team sucks, as if it had anything to do with how good Rutgers' is.

that the media was broken, here's another example. Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/04/technolo...gin&oref=slogin Short version: Yahoo! and Reuters are going to be accepting submission from users for news. Cellphones, professional, it doesn't matter as people don't care. People who submit the content won't be compensated, unless it goes wide in the Reuters network, for which there will be a minimal compensation. I know reporters are vilified on here, but they serve some decent purposes. The quality of news will continue its sad slide, and this only helps it. Reuters gets to receive lots of free content without having to pay a reporter, which seems like a win for them. Yahoo! gets content that allows them to show more advertisements as well as compete with Google Video/Google's Youtube. Even more pictures/video clips are going to start showing up which are way out of context and don't present a good picture of the situation at hand. Its a win for both Yahoo! and Reuters, and it sucks for everyone else. I'm not exactly sure how to fix it, but I do know one thing - a media which is funded by and slaves to its shareholders causes news quality to decline rapidly.

1.) That call to not go for it was the correct call. It was on like the Bills 15 yard line. Not making it would have made a bad game at that point much worse. Remember, it was still the first half. 2.) From what I heard on WGR, the timeout was called by JP and then Jauron decided to throw the challenge flag. Granted, it was still a stupid waste of a timeout and Jauron should be chastised for it, but I don't think the timeout was called to decide whether to challenge or not. 3.) That was indeed a bad mistake. The Bills should have waited for the clock to start up again, and the confusion on the sidelines is unacceptable. That being said, I'd much rather have Jauron and his staff who has been good at making adjustments and gameplans over any of the clowns we've had the past couple of times.

Because one lineman is indicative of a whole school, right? Blalock is playing OG this year. He was at OT last year.

Oh noes...

How bout foreign affairs?

Ironic, coming from you.

Ed, you obviously do not understand the intarweb. It was a sarcastic reference to the orly owl series as the logic demonstrated by your post is on the same level.

Well, I guess it would be hip hop, since I'm a white geek.

I bet after they gave him the seat upgrade, they also gave him a bottle of crown, which he just couldn't resist.

You mean that you think Louisville will beat Wake Forest? NO WAI!!! ME TOO!!

Oh noes, TEH SPELLING COPZ ARE HERE. LOOK OUATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT (PS Ed - Spelling doesn't have anything to do with Rutgers either)

All-star lineup posting in this thread.

Ed, you are a deuchebag.

Gee, I dunno, perhaps played pretty decently against one of the toughest pass defenses in the league?

I think the safety's did what they were asked to today. San Diego did a good job of exploiting the zone with the routes that they chose, and caused Whitner/Simpson to have 1-on-1 coverage and/or have to take off to the receivers.

The enter key will not hurt you.

Heh, you've been watching the bad stretch most likely then.