Fan in Chicago

hate the pick but to NGU

He is the TBD's version of deep throat - gave the board a heads up about a couple of items this offseason and they were correct. He posts infrequently, or when he has solid information. We believe he is in the know about things that are going on inside the FO. In general, the board tries to keep him under wraps.

If you wanted precisely one person to respond, a PM would work better.

The 'RW is cheap' rant ? Is there any evidence to back up your claims ? I think it is equally possible that the FO did not want to consider BR at all because of character issues - this discussion would be long before the issue of money is discussed.

Have you seen The Accused ?

Eric Berry C.J. Spiller Not because I think they are bad players but because I think #9 is too valuable for a position we don't need filled.

Or you could PM me your phone number and I will text you the first pick.

PTR is sub-consciously channeling his inner Nevergiveup and cleverly implying a trade down such that we have no picks on Day 1.

I had been a vocal critic of TO last season. But seeing that Reed and him are gone, the lack of experience at the WR position scares me. I wouldn't mind having TO back for at least one season in case his half assedness (sic) turns out to be better than the full efforts of Hardy/Johnson.

Why don't you go ask those hip chicks who think a Wrangler around them gives them a bad girl persona ?

... I will jump off a bridge

In the past two brutal years, refinery profits sank. Secondly, with the signals on mandates for increased bio-fuels, the message was clear to the refining industry - gasoline demand in the long run will stay flat or shrink. In response to the short term over-capacity and the bearish projections for the future, capacity was taken out of the system to balance the dropped demand and low margins.and 4-5 refineries were permanently shutdown What happens now when demand spikes ? I am sure the shutdown refineries will be put up as Exhibit A of 'measures to ensure high prices'.

Conversely, if the FO is not sold on Claussen, I can see them staying put with the QBs we have and using the picks in shoring up the lines + adding a WR. ie. giving all the tools for Edwards to succeed. After all, Nix has been honest in saying that they cannot fill all holes in one offseason (I paraphrase ofcourse).

Tiger did that ? Really ?

Does that make us all resident aliens ? About time we got a earthizenship (sorry).

The sponsors won't care if the people don't.

I am not entirely sure the Redskins won't draft Clausen anyway. If they believe in Clausen, they may trade down a few spots, pick up Clausen and an extra pick to be used for an OL. The McNabb deal gives them breathing room for a couple of years while Clausen learns. I realize this implies that they would have spent two high picks on QBs this year, but a trade-down would still give them an option to draft OL.

Do you expect TT to dress up as Jesus ?

Care to elaborate ? Thaler is a professor who is very well respected in the economics and behavioral field. The points he makes in this article are very good. What is yours ?

Considering we are discussing Whit here, answering your question is difficult.

I argue the 'NER' was not required

Not officially but sure plenty on this board still cling to those hopes. As you and I know, none of his coaches have so far known how to best make use of him.

What if he really gets traded ? Who will believe the news then ?