Bob in Mich

Here is a recent story on cannabis extracts for pets http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pot-for-pets-liquid-cannabis/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab6a&linkId=35412908

Please, he is bad for sure, but don't call President Trump a scumbag. That is disrespectful of the office.

So, why do you think the Russians put any effort or money into our elections?

Must be getting uncomfortable for those defending the admin, eh?. They are frantically throwing out uranium, war, Bill, Hillary, and Obama. Pace yourself guys. Use your distractions wisely......lol

Shoulda said, 'Peed'

looks a bit nervous to me

Sessions clearly was less than honest with Al Franken under oath. http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/03/02/al-franken-jeff-sessions-misleading-russia-newday.cnn/video/playlists/senator-jeff-sessions/ http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2017/03/02/jeff-sessions-russia-contact-sergey-kislyak-sje-orig.cnn/video/playlists/mobile-digital-features/

Ah-ha!!! Knew it.

Appreciate the confirmation

I am not at all surprised your imagination takes you to such perverse places. Character shows

Chaffetz says Sessions needs to recuse himself

It seems the course of Sessions' denials is similar to Flynn's course. 1) Nope, never met with the Russians. 2) Oh, you know I did? OK, then what I meant to say is, 'I did meet with them but did not discuss the political campaign.' 3) Oh, you actually know what we talked about? OK, then what I meant to say is, 'I did meet with them, but I don't recall what was discussed.' Denying under oath, when not actually asked by Franken, that he spoke to any Russians was position 1) above. Sessions is at position 2) now.

Anyone else worried about Tom?

Thanks for the tip. I'll give it the weight it deserves

Bite me, fool

GW Pharmaceuticals is probably the leading company in the development of cannabis as medicine. In this thread, one related to the medical effects of cannabis, touting the pipeline successes of this company is totally appropriate, imo. The point of my post wasn't to coax you into buying the stock. I am pretty confident the financial impact of this group will not affect the stock price. The point was to show the ever expanding use of cannabis as medicine.

GW Pharmaceuticals' stock price got another recent pop on more FDA trial results. Positive results have recently been reported in brain cancer, epilepsy, and several other maladies. See this graphic of their product pipeline. https://www.gwpharm.com/products-pipeline/pipeline https://www.thestreet.com/story/13996559/1/gw-pharmaceuticals-is-set-to-benefit-as-cannabis-takes-on-cancer.html from the article "The signals of efficacy demonstrated in this study further reinforce the potential role of cannabinoids in the field of oncology and provide GW with the prospect of a new and distinct cannabinoid product candidate in the treatment of glioma," Chief Executive Justin Gover said. Investors who are looking to play a coming green rush when it comes to cannabis-themed stocks should get into GW Pharmaceuticals. The company is very close to securing regulatory approval for Epidiolex, its treatment for children with severe types of epilepsy such as Dravet syndrome.

This is an informative short video series done by a nurse, Mary Lynn Mathre, of 'Patients Out of Time'. Here is a link :

In watching games over the last few weeks I noticed that the Sabres d-men seem to use a particular tactic that costs them repeatedly. I have been trying to decide if it is directed or just undisciplined play. When an opposing forward, on the rush, crosses the blueline and then peels back out toward the blueline, our d-men seem to chase the puck carrier back out toward the blueline. This leaves a forward to cover the defensive slot. These forwards, even when in covering position, very often fail to tie up the opposition forwards and if the puck gets fired back into our slot area, we give up a good chance. Is this just sloppy defense, or is this tactic by the d-men being coached? Either way, it is costing them.

There is nothing new here. This is another review of existing studies. If you dig down a layer from the headline into the studies, you will again see that the headlines are very misleading. Regarding the schizophrenia, again, nothing new. Association does not mean causation. People with mental health problems often have substance abuse problems too. They self medicate attempting to find relief If cannabis use caused schizophrenia, shouldn't the number of schizophrenics rise with increased cannabis usage in a given population? It hasn't. With respect to the review's findings that cannabis has not shown to be effective for some illness, again there is nothing new here. They conclude that there are not enough placebo controlled double blind studies done to provide proof. We all know that until recently, research studies designed to show benefits of cannabis have been prohibited. So, there is not enough good evidence to prove many claims.

Trump supporters: What crimes or immoral acts (short of murder) would cause you to stop supporting him? Rape? Statutory rape? What if it was 5 years ago, is that OK? Theft? Business deals that violate US sanctions? Not trying to limit you here, just throwing out ideas to get you started.

Nope, didn't say that, genius

Trump supporters, the ones I see anyway, at this point will continue to support unless there is irrefutable evidence that he has committed murder. Short of that, he's fine...he's not a Clinton

Yessss! I knew all along that we were really good

The 'Young Turks' have their theories on this study https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuOSjV7ULz0