SectionC3

That’s a bit of a long sentence. Try deleting “is being overshadowed by” and inserting “overshadows.” If I’m going to be insulted, I demand that it be done with proper grammar. Any time Trump feels like getting around to telling the truth is fine with me. What’s a fluffer?

And that's the point. It's just a guess. Another Trump Hoax, if you will.

Hoax. Also a bit ironic, given your penchant for name-calling and denigration. But your grammar has improved. That's a plus. It's Thursday, June 25, and as of yet nobody has specified what exactly #Obamagate is. Nope. This is my playground, too. And I don't consider the services I provide here pollution. Rather, I'm cleaning up the toxicity that abounded in this right-wing, alt-wrong echo chamber before I arrived.

Pardon?

Still didn’t answer the question about what you do for a living. I’ll take a whack at a response. You’re a moderately educated lower middle class white guy who blames somebody else for the fact that, despite your hard and honest work at your relatively menial job, you never quite reached the station in life you think you deserved. This is mostly due to the fact that you didn’t work quite as hard as you thought you did, you didn’t prioritize education early in life, and the hard work in which you engaged was directed toward the wrong things. Deep down, you know you’re a loser and you put others down to try to make yourself feel better. Basically the classic narrative of the white lowlife southerner who dumps on minorities and others not because he hates but because putting others down means he doesn’t have the shittiest life of the bunch. I’ll assume I nailed it until I hear otherwise.

Performed on my what? Hoax. It was your question. Your poorly phrased question, for what it’s worth.

cork deep I imagine.

Hoax. What is it that you do for a living?

Hoax. Sophistry is the perfect word for what happened today. It’s not about Flynn. It’s about the rule of law. https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEI9uxhyk7W_Vpi7JlTakcWsqFQgEKg0IACoGCAowuLUIMNFnMLnhAg?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

So, are you planning on joining Jacob Wohl in taking up arms? Maybe DJT can join you. He's good at shooting giraffes. He could be a helpful ally. Hoax.

Hoax. It was the question. You inserted the word "being" in today. But you didn't have it initially. Hoax. Except for the fact that he is still guilty. Try reading the dissent. Fake news. Hoax.

It’s a pretty stark split between majority and dissent. According to the dissent, there’s also a circuit split. That, coupled with the unique nature of the underlying legal issue, makes it a good candidate for an en banc. And let’s be clear here. This ruling is elevation of form over substance. Personally I don’t care whether Flynn is guilty, innocent, or somewhere in between. This decision invites prosecutorial abuse and favoritism. The vehicle by which Flynn now likely will escape further prosecution subjugates substance to prosecutorial caprice. The worm someday will turn and there will be a defendant who the pro-Flynn crowd doesn’t like who will benefit from this. It will be wrong then, too. Hoax. You’re the weasel. Do you still believe that Jews have an obligation to be racist? I haven’t heard much from you lately, which is surprising since you’re allegedly the intellectual standard bearer of the alt-wrong crowd around here.

Hoax. I simply repeated a freshly-uttered Trumpism. I’m sorry to learn that you think the trumpism is weak, at that its utterer by extension also is weak. This is a point on which we can agree: Trump is a low-energy, weak, sad loser. I’m glad that after all of our discourse we found common ground on this important point!

So now you think Trump is weak? Duly noted, Creepster. The worst instance of church tarnishment In this whole episode occurred when Trump visited St. John’s.

Hoax. You need to check Donald Trump’s twitter. He said it, not me. “Washed up Creepster” is such a great turn of phrase! Good point. It is after noon, meaning that it’s acceptable to be drunk by now.

The Washed up Creepster is back! Good afternoon, sir! Serious question: are you high? It’s OK if you are (as long as you’re not driving or operating construction equipment or mowing your law). This is pretty whacked stuff. You’re normally more . . . Normal than this.

Good point. Now I’m scared. Hopefully I can scrounge up some ludes to take the edge off. Sorry for dancing around the possibility of a new government wanting to take harsh measures to muzzle me.

Hoax. I’m not fearful. And I’m not trying to fool anyone.

Hoax. You’re the resident idiot here.

Nobody said it’s Trump’s job to manage local policing. And the hyperbole fits. Trump is the guy who apparently wants to execute offending journalists, who was cool with gassing protesters for his sham photo op in front of a church he exploits, who baselessly accuses others of treason, and who believes that we should casually dispense five- or ten-year sentences for unnamed crimes committed by people around protests.

I hope that’s sarcasm. Melania Trump practices better grammar than does that guy. And she’s on level 1 of Rosetta Stone English.

Small tip that is appropriate for you. If you’re going to attack the IQ of another person, at least use proper grammar. You should have said, “that ... guy with whom you share a double-digit IQ.” Carry on.

A witty comeback. It's about time. Nice!

Hoax. What does "tibtard" mean? Are you picking on those with disabilities? If so, shame on you. At least pick on someone who might be able to fight back.

You're right. The destruction of public property isn't protesting. It's vandalism, and the people engaging in that conduct are vandals. So when your douchebag friends say things like "let's throw acid on the protestors," please correct them and say that in this country, much to the chagrin of our douchebag president, we don't use chemical weapons on people who exercise their First Amendment rights.