Jump to content

SectionC3

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,720
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SectionC3

  1. Hoax. I mock and deride through sarcasm. Those who attempt to respond in kind initiate my approach. They are the flatterers, not me. and for what it’s worth, the correlation between imitation and admiration, assuming there is one, did not arise until your comment. So it’s a false equivalency. Kind of like trying to link hydroxychloroquine to meaningfully efficacious COVID-19 treatment. In other words, it’s a hoax.
  2. I’ll take that as a yes. Sad!
  3. So ... you’re terrified of a bunch of pussies?
  4. So what is ANTIFA? You're apparently the expert on such things. Educate us, sir.
  5. New York State does. That’s another possibility for me. I would like to go in person if at all possible to relieve some of the crush that will befall our local BOE (which, by the way, is tremendous).
  6. Not sure. Depends what I have going on on Election Day.
  7. Hoax. It wasn’t a request. I’m a taxpayer. It was more of a demand. You work for me. Copying the libs to own the libs. Nice!
  8. Good point. Those dudes that shipped off to Afghanistan or Iraq or Germany or South Korea who meet your criteria should fly home on their own dime and using their own leave - if they can get it - to vote. same thing for ER docs working 24 hour shifts on Election Day. Been to target? Eff off. You can’t vote. all in all, a good plan on your end. See prior comment.
  9. Define “able.”
  10. Still no denial. And are you even an attorney? Perhaps that question should be investigated.
  11. Hoax. Absentee ballot typically are cast via mail. This is what you said: “our checks and prescriptions are never late, but nice try, worried about voting by mail? Get off your lazy mothertrucking butt and put on a mask and vote in person” And yet, despite ample opportunity, you haven’t denied that you feed at the government trough.
  12. Nice. So it is gov’t bucks. That’s a start. Now, let’s move to step #2. Where was that work performed? I’m going to take a whack at it and say that much of it was not performed in either your publicly-provided office or in a courtroom. More specifically, it was performed at home. So, the question remains, why is it acceptable for you to get paid in government funds for work performed from home, but unacceptable for teachers to be compensated with like monies for work performed in a like location?
  13. Gov’t bucks. That’s how you make it. And you have time to respond, but no time to come up with facts. Lame response from lame boonies lawyer.
  14. Racism. Perfect for hate week. Also, alternative facts are great. Any data supporting your 1.5 million number? Probably just made it up, which is par for the course for Trumpers. On the one hand, the virus is a hoax and will magically disappear. On the other hand, Dear Leader saved 1.5 million by banning flights from China. Only in your warped reality does this make sense.
  15. You keep on saying ignorance, but you don’t have any, you know, specific reasons why it’s ignorance. Maybe it’s sort of an “alternative ignorance,” kind of like your alternative reality in which you’re not benefitting from socialism (even though you really have) but it’s cool for you to repeat some BS tropes and allege that teachers should take a haircut because they don’t deserve full dime for working from home. Aren’t you the same guy who was railing against absentee voting by mail this morning but then clammed up when you realized that your boy Trump votes that way?
  16. So I take it you’re not giving it back? Makes sense. It’s OK for you to work from home at a full rate, but teachers can’t do the same. *** And, basically, when you really think about it, you’re a socialist. But the OK kind that Trump likes. Cash the Trump socialism bucks? I bet you did. Take government money for nothing when you’re “working” from home? All signs point to yes. But you’re a “Republican,” so when you engage in the practice it’s not socialism. It’s only when others do it that it counts as socialism.
  17. Bottom line: it wasn’t a hoax and it never magically disappeared. Got it. How does one make progress against a hoax? And why do we need progress now, when this was supposed to have magically disappeared in April? Could it be that the progress comes after far too many have died in part due to the ignorance and foolishness of Trump? And where do we stand in the Lysol issue? Is that a friend or a foe?
  18. New entry for hate week: the Bible. Trump doesn’t follow it, doesn’t respect it, and hasn’t read it. And, to the extent his fake Christian followers have read it, they blithely ignore it and worship their false idol. So, biblical teachings, GTFO. The prosperity gospel runs this show.
  19. Nice. Donnie is exempted. But all those people who set the stage for him? Oops. Not as much. And Chad Wolf? He's not the president or the Vice President. Oops again. But you're the rule of law party! Makes. Perfect. Sense.
  20. That's a good point. Maybe we should put nepotism into hate week. Thank you for brining up that important point! Let us know when you're going to give back the part of your government salary that you "earned" working from home during the pandemic. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. You want teachers to take a haircut? Step right up and do the same. If you're going to lead, you have to do it from the front!
  21. “My father.” Eric trump is such a loser. Maybe someday he’ll do something on his own. The he won’t have to say “my father” rebrew times a minute. Grow the eff up and be a of big and do something in your own.
  22. Ohhhh another one! The hatch act. Eff that ***** and the rule of law. We do what we want; White House convention speech, Secretary of State speech from Jerusalem. It’s all good. Eff it. We do what we want, rule of law be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...