
SectionC3
Community Member-
Posts
7,494 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by SectionC3
-
The Big Gamble: Hydroxychloroquine
SectionC3 replied to Magox's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
So you believe HCQ should be taken as a prophylactic measure? Maybe in a clinical study. But not on a lark. Like trump is doing. -
The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:
SectionC3 replied to Deranged Rhino's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Spread rapidly like the pandemic that was supposed to have just disappeared by now? So has Mike Flynn's sentencing following his guilty plea. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Your bottle of prophylactic hydroxychloroquine, of course. And yet about 38% of the country will lap up whatever nonsense these people come up with. You can fool some of the people all of the time. -
Link 1 involves a know your rights campaign. I'm not selective about when people in this country can and cannot exercise their rights. Maybe you are. Link 2 is blocked by a paywall and appears to involve but one Democrat. Let's just say for fun that your fallacy of extrapolation holds water here. By the same logic, because eight Trumpers have pleaded guilty to various crimes as a result of the Mueller investigation, Trumpers are criminals who undermine the rule of law. I don't believe in painting with broad strokes like that, but since you do I guess you're stuck in a reality in which Trumpers are criminals who do not support the rule of law. So, although I wish it wasn't the case, it seems as if you're characterizing Trumpers as criminals. A bit harsh, in my view, but if that's where you want to take a stand I'm not going to get in your way. Fake news. The libs own you.
-
The Big Gamble: Hydroxychloroquine
SectionC3 replied to Magox's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Kind of like how taking it as a preventative measure is only for stupid Trumpers. Got it. -
The Big Gamble: Hydroxychloroquine
SectionC3 replied to Magox's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
-
The Big Gamble: Hydroxychloroquine
SectionC3 replied to Magox's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
He’s beefcake! -
The Big Gamble: Hydroxychloroquine
SectionC3 replied to Magox's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
He is one corpulent b*tch, that is for sure. -
The Big Gamble: Hydroxychloroquine
SectionC3 replied to Magox's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Maybe the big fella is trying it as a weight loss drug, he went all “melting snowflake” on Pelosi today. He seems a bit touchy about his corpulence. I guess if he gets a little fatter (assuming that is possible) he may catch William Howard Taft and be top at least one presidential list: most slovenly chief executive ever. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to Hedge's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Explosive national debt. New taxes on American consumers. Trade barriers. Threatens liberal use of eminent domain to build wall. Unconstitutional power grab to fund wall. Claims absolute authority. Depression era unemployment. Interferes with ongoing judicial proceedings. Volume II of the Mueller report. He’s a fake conservative. Nothing more. -
You must hate what trump did with respect to wall funding if you like the rule of law. Volume II of the mueller report must be a real problem for you too. And this Flynn plea withdrawal thing? Why not let motion practice run it’s course and reserve judgment on the issue? Seems like that’s what someone who supports the rule of law would do.
-
The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency
SectionC3 replied to Nanker's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I had never considered the idea that Rhino is a Russian agent. Maybe he should be on the traitors list. Food for thought. -
Bottom line: You still haven’t figured out the difference between a declaration and a plea. *** EDIT: In the meantime, just in case you forgot, Mike Flynn still is guilty. Enjoy! Tell Hans at the next conspiracy theorists meeting that the Court spoke to “applicable local rules,” not simply to “local rules.”