Jump to content

SectionC3

Community Member
  • Posts

    7,761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SectionC3

  1. Looked. Can’t find it. Saw it on FB last night. It might be on wnymedia.net sometime today. https://news.wbfo.org/post/protesters-return-hertel-confronted-bar-patrons Here’s a pic of the confrontation. The guy in the Bud Light shirt was pretty upset about the exercise of First Amendment rights. He and other (similarly old, washed, and moderately sober patrons) did things like flip off the protesters, yell racial slurs, and insult them from the sidewalk outside the bar. The guy with the 80s mullet, who actually played peacemaker in this photo, displayed his anus to the crowd as well. Not classy.
  2. OMG. Saw the video last night. What a bunch of scumbags. Scratch MT Pockets off the list of places in which I will set foot. Wow.
  3. Smells like late summer this morning in Buffalo. And I detected a whiff of hot garbage as well on the walk into work. But nothing is on fire. Thankfully. More updates later. Also, I don’t know about you, but I think that all of this hand-wringing about democrat-run cities spontaneously combusting is a bit of a . . . Hoax.
  4. That’s probably a hoax, too.
  5. Biden in Orchard Park. Trump will win the town, and probably split nearby suburbs like West Seneca and Cheektowaga. But the Trump support (or anti-Hillary “support”) isn’t nearly what it was last time. The Bush Republicans are not going to vote for another four years of this crap. So hopefully that portends well for similar areas in similar states.
  6. Interesting that this thread has been up for about a day and we still haven’t heard from @Deranged Rhino. I wonder why?
  7. You have a pretty warped view of justification. Last I looked, resisting arrest doesn’t justify seven gunshots to the back.
  8. Actually that’s the purpose of the thread. I’d like you to educate me on your expert communist arsonist detection skills and techniques. Based on the criteria I was able to uncover, the guys in the photos qualify as commies. Do you have different criteria? And, if so, can you please share? We all would like to improve our ability to identify the communist arsonists who cause you to tremble in fear. This definitely adds a new layer of complication to our analysis.
  9. Good data point. Fugliness is not an essential commie trait. Well done.
  10. I agree except for the undercurrent. I worked the streets in 2016. I had a bad vibe in September. I sensed the persuadables were going to break for Trump. Close the book on the Clintons, I thought, was a great line at the end. but otherwise, completely agree.
  11. I don’t assume anything. I just want to know whether the fact of a prior sexual assault justifies shooting someone seven times in the back. There seems to be a real struggle to answer that question on the part of the people who read this thread. Fake news.
  12. OK. So let’s move to the next step. Does the information with respect to the sexual assault, assuming the officer in question had that information and knew that he was dealing with Blake immediately before the shooting, justify shooting Blake seven times?
  13. Now we’re getting somewhere. Someone finally has a metric for identifying a communist. Next we need to know how others identify these communist arsonists who are terrifying so many people across our country.
  14. Your point, sir?
  15. Not the issue yet. Let’s take it slow. Did the officer know of the sexual assault at the time the officer shot Blake? One question at a time.
  16. Hoax. You just can’t come up with anything better. We all know it.
  17. Hoax. I have never started a thread with the intent of drawing attention to an anonymous Internet profile. Was my intent to mock those who take their anonymous Internet profiles far to seriously? I plead the Fifth.
  18. indeed it is. Now, did the officer who shot Blake know of that history when the trigger was pulled?
  19. Nice job changing the quote. I ask again, how is the sexual assault relevant to that incident?
  20. That’s some pretty witty stuff. The Internet is better for that contribution.
  21. So why mention sexual assault? How is that relevant? Unless, of course, you’re trying to mislead and confuse.
  22. Interestingly, none of those who quake in fear of communist arsonists and Antifa has shared their tips for identifying such terrorists.
  23. A fair point. But watch the video. It’s not good for the guy with the knife.
  24. And again there’s no other new coronavirus from 2019 that is circulating, so the COVID-19 designation is sufficient to alert all as to the virus in question. There is no need for additional geographic or political description, such as “China Virus,” “Chinese Virus,” or “Wuhan Virus.” Unless, of course, you happen to support xenophobia and bigotry.
×
×
  • Create New...