WotAGuy

650,000 of em! 🤣🤣

Interesting article about some of the league’s inner machinations. https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/37965420/the-secret-history-dan-snyder-demise-washington-commanders-owner

Apparently not very many.

I read OJ almost died because Al Cowlings was driving him to the hospital at like 20 MPH.

What exactly did Josh say that set him off?

In which case, you’d have X number of inane posts preceding it.

If only @Einsteinwere this lucid during their football threads.

Day drinking?

Billy Joe Hobart? So many options for “legends” in Bills lore.

Maybe their agreements with the cable companies and other entities that carry ESPN want to ensure that viewers are forced to use their venue to watch? If ESPN went to their own platform, they would only be paid for viewers that specifically want to watch. As it is now, they get paid by a lot of cable subscribers that never turn ESPN on. Just spitballing here…

Me neither

Huh! All this time I thought it was the networks bidding themselves into oblivion that was setting the market.

Well, his name IS “JimBob”. What do you expect?

Will it be a Swiftie?

The whining is worse than when @teefand @Royale with Cheesewere shut out of getting Taylor Swift tickets.

I agree with this, and with Alpha’s take. Diggs didn’t overtly air his gripes, but definitely sent messages by his absence and tweets that he wasn’t happy about something. He just didn’t reveal what it was.

Need to put Einstein on it. He can’t dress himself, but I bet he can handle this.

What’s the leash on this thread?

Sounds like you have enough data to predict McDermott’s “leash”. 🤣

Can’t believe the OP didn’t have something along the lines of “There’s a girl in the stands at the 31:45 mark - would ya?”

Don’t call yourself “laypeople”. You’re an Einstein!

Oh the irony!

It’s not our fault you don’t know what you’re talking about and don’t use the correct terms or examples in making your disjointed points. LOL

Correct, and none of that has anything to do with past events. Einstein basically calculated some statistics from past events and then made it into some kind of probability statement about future events.

But they are not presenting those as probabilities of future events. At least not according to Einstein’s example of what a probability is. The problem is Einstein is generating statistics from past events and using that to calculate the probability of a future event. That’s not what a probability is. I think he is meaning to generate odds of a future event, which is different from probability.