RkFast

RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!! RACIST!!!

The argument about whether or not it was racist is not germane to the discussion about its ramifications. And youre wrong. The Post apologized less than 48 hours later, the "mob" did not disperse and then Murdoch HIMSELF apologized today...and the "mob" STILL did not accept it. And could you please stop being so damned phony? They want the Post and Murdoch to be sanctioned by the FCC and force him to maybe sell one of his media holdings in NYC. Youre talking an effort that could result in transactions worth tens of millions of dollars. Over a cartoon???!!!?? Thats not a BIT punitive in your eyes? Of course not. Becuase its not "your guy" on the receiving line. Lets do an excersise: Swap out NY Post with HBO/Bill Maher. Swap out Obama with Palin. Swap out "monkey cartoon" with Maher calling Palin a "waitress." And mind you that comment was made ONE DAY after her speech at the RNC. And swap out NAACP/Sharpton with NOW. I know this is an impossibility, given Palin wasnt a libera,l but stay with me. GOT IT? OK..... WHAT WOULD YOUR REACTION BE IF NOW WENT AFTER HBO THE WAY SHARPTON/NAACP IS GOING AFTER NY POST???? BE HONEST.

And here is why people are cowards. The NY Post ran a cartoon that many found offensive, Murdoch HIMSELF issued a contrite apology and its STILL not enough for the grievance mongers and race hustlers who are out for blood. http://www.newsday.com/news/local/newyork/...0,4121997.story So Holder....why WOULD anyone want to "discuss race" when you step one inch "out of line" and there is literally an angry mob outside your door looking to destroy you? And worse...destroy you in the name of "justice."

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/24/wal...eref=rss_latest

How about talking to Wall Street investors? I got a few friends on Wall Street and at World Financial and to a man, they ALL dreaded "the One" being elected. To a man.

What truth? That youre a hypocritical !@#$turd?

Thats !@#$ing funny.

I love getting lectured about blanket staetments, narrowmindedness and bigotry from people who makes statements like this.

Says the nitwit who hoped I meet a Muslim bigoted against Italian Americans on a street in Islamabad and fight to the death.

Im just trying to figure out why the Attorney General, who just got in office, if giving a referendum on the Nation's Social Issues. Whats he going to tackle next? The traffic on our commutes? Youre not Jackie Robinson. Youre not even (Now here's to you) Mrs. Robinson. STFU and do the job you were hired for, Eric.

Nothing. It was a metaphorical link to a current event, which cartoonists do all day long. The quote clearly says "WRITE THE BILL." If it said "now lets see him try to sign the bill" then youd have a point. It clearly pointed out who the dead chimp was suppossed to be...Congress. They arent. It was a silly cartoon. There is no connection. Oh no...lets not "inflame" anybody. Except white Christian Italian males. Them we can bash to all high hell, stereotype, call names, etc. If someone is "impacted" by a stupid cartoon, then itd call them a navel gazing window licker seeing three of four therapists between shifts at Wendy's. Heres the deal...I dont give a sh-- about the actual cartoon. It was pretty effing stupid. The point is, if we are now in the territory of having to hold our tounges in regards to poking fun of the President, youre going down a real slippery slope. What has Bush been subject to? Clinton STILL gets sh-- for a lot of things. Remember Regan? Oh yeah...he was never the "victim" of this type of stuff. I could go back to WASHINGTON. Lame cartoon or not. I dont care. What I DO care about is the thought/PC police kicking into high gear now. Id be against a lot of stuff becuase I got pissed at the crap thrown at Bush a lot. So I wouldnt then condone Obama gettign the same bad treatment. But thisis a cartoon that doesnt even SPEAK to him. So Come on.

How the !@#$ is it "racist" when they arent talking about Obama or ANY black person, you nimrod???!!!??

He calls it troubling, huh? Well considering the monkey was parodying CONGRESS, and not OBAMA, I call Sharpton !@#$ing STUPID. CONGRESS writes bills, not the President you money swindling !@#$tard. And to think he ran for President! Go away, you attention seeking whore. Plus....even if was for Obama...didnt we just go through eight years of the President being called a "chimp"? Oh....NOW thats bad.

But that is COMPLETELY dishonest. Maybe it really had nothing to do with religion. But with the events of the last few years, with the tapings of Berg's killing and others, the stereotype has been set. Wrong? Maybe. But the fact remains that Muslims wolrdwide...maybe a lot...maybe a small group....commit these acts in the name of their God. INDISPUTABLE. So when one went down here, it wasnt really hard to go 2+2=4. Ill say this....if he killed her any other way, I wouldnt have given this story a second thought...or at least not thought about it in a religious sense. Maybe that was the killer's intention? He knew that if he did this act in this manner he would get more "press" out of it? Dont scowl....murderers DO think that way.

Its the same reason why when you call a righty a "conversative" or "right wing", they go "!@#$ YEAH!!" But call a lefty a "liberal" and they get shy and correct you and say "call me progressive" or some other such nonsense. Thye cant even admit what they are. What does that say about them?

Right...and youre a real open minded guy. The difference between me, and you and even Deb girl? At least I realize Im a blind partisan hack. YOU !@#$tards are blind partisan hackhs, but also think youre being real open-minded and objective about the whole thing. So that makes you not only a hack...but also !@#$ing phony as all get out as well. I may be a hack...Ill never dispute that. but at least Im true to my hackdom and know what I am. I dont put on airs or pretend Im something Im NOT. Im real. You, Deb and everyone like you are phony !@#$s.

FIXED Find me a Priest who then ATTACKED the boy and nearly killed him with acid. I know....small differences.

Im going to have some fun with this. If Im going to be a "bigot", I might as well get the full nine: http://www.kashmirobserver.net/index.php?o...ws&Itemid=2 http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=161177 http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=5185 Let me know when you find the Chritistian/Jewish/Buddhist versions of these atrocities.

My God....with WHAT????!!???

As, the old "molson" defense. Good one.

Youve got to !@#$ing be kidding me.

OK, if this bill was such a big "EMERGENCY!!!!!" to sign, how come we're now told to be "patient" to see results? How come it was intended to "create" 4,000,000 jobs, but now its "create and/or save" 4,000,000 jobs? And finally....why is this bill essentially rolling back the 1996 Welfare Reform Act? And Id like REAL answers, not Pelosi answers.

If Im so far off how come you STILL havent condemned the act? Sure, you called it a "hideous", but only in the prism of other acts, either 40 or 500 years ago. Even when you posted your link, it didnt spell out women's rights directly WRG Islam. Again...stop getting on me. Youre digging your own grave, pal.

Every single time someone trot out a story like this, liberals FLOCK to it and throw out the "other religions do it, too" line. Every Single Time. So bash your head against the wall all you want. Its YOUR behavior thats leading people to believe youre excusing this behavior.

So past history excuses current behavior.