GG

You started this thread. You should participate more than autobotting twitter feeds. Exactly what does Mueller's recent accusations against Manafort mean to the Russia collusion probe against Trump?

In your own words (if that's even possible for a bot), what does this mean?

He's not necessarily lying. All the things you're discussing happened after he left office. It's certainly plausible that he vacated the White House with a significant negative net worth.

I think it was your previous references to Levy or Minsky, but I'll use your strawberry picking example. As the economy grows and standards of living rise, there is going to be a shortage of menial low skilled workers. Technology has been a much greater killer of those vaunted manufacturing jobs than China.

I remember a certain economist who espoused a theory that as capitalism continues to succeed, there will be a shortage of workers who will want to accept menial, low skilled work.

What in the world are you blabbing about? That shows a gross misunderstanding of how the economy functions. We are not "responsible" for China's economy. We produce and consume 20 percent of global output while holding 5 percent of population. How do you expect that to occur if there's no open market? The China trade matter is totally different because now they're abusing it. But the way to fix it is not by starting a global trade war.

Perhaps you and Bannon can explain how the US can provide 1/5 of global GDP by turning more inward.

Anyone who has an ounce of libertarian bent should be petrified of Bannon's economic thinking.

Kyle Orton deflecting to Lee Smith? There's got to be a bad Bills joke in there somewhere

Wonder how many pallets of cash that will take?

What do you mean it doesn't pay well? I hear someone's neighbor earns enough to buy a Land Rover working from home for a few hours a week?

In a perfect world, you're 100% correct. In reality, it's not the case, especially in the last 20 years as celebrities received far more airtime and import in the political arena. Hell, the sitting President got into office thanks to the popularity of a show that had "Celebrity" in its title. As an aside, I wonder that now with the benefit of time, would Greggy want to revisit the age-old discussion about the effects that The Daily Show had on news and the political discourse?

Darin & Tom are Waldorf & Statler

Better be careful using that phrase around CNN

Certainly not for snowflakes.

Or communists

Ospreys do a daily flyover up the Hudson As an aside, there was another weird photo op of a plane circling the Statue a few weeks back. Of course the low approach heads straight into the high rises at the Battery.

Darin won't be happy

He didn't male that happen

So when does this move to PPP?

You mean too much of a good thing. Trump better solve the immigration puzzle.

Then you're the minority. Nobody admits to buying the Post. But nobody doesn't open it if it's lying around.

This is comical. I think the next thing Trump should do is have a photo op with Brandi B and announce his support for Obamacare. I'm betting it will be dumped by the Dems within a minute.

Peterman over Kaepernick? Are you serious?

Kaep is good enough to play in the NFL. He's not good enough to compensate for the added noise and distraction that his signing would bring.