GG

Further proof that Trump was right in his locker room banter with Billy Bush.

Landry claims another Bills' body?

That's still pretty impressive for a CA kid. It's in mid 30's and windy today

Of course they did, and are probably happy they didn't win the bidding war that they never really participated in.

Don't you think that should be a larger part of the discussion? Do you think it's a coincidence that two franchises whose medical staffs had an intimate view of Watkins health declined to commit to him for the long term?

He's paid at the top of his position, whose cap number will hit nearly $20 million in '19, yet his production is among the middling WRs.

A more balanced view of Benjamin's release from Fairburn at The Athletic

Who would that be?

Does Kelvin Benjamin fanboys fit?

The MSM spin on this story is that Flynn has flipped on Trump.

Is that the new equipment manager?

And exactly how did they spend more in releasing them?

What kind of stupid take is that by Massare?

Hughes would be dominant if the refs called the plays evenly across the players.

How many free shots at the QB? How many blatant holds that killed drives?

Wow, few times we agree. Hewas definitely pushed back a lot, but he never let a guy get by him. I'm sure you are basing your opinion on your own review of Sirles' play as opposed to regurgitating what other people posted on twittersphere.

And yet he was better than the two guys who preceeded him.

Lower prices in more competitive markets are usually a short term phenomenon as players fight for share and sacrifice profits (see retail). Over time, the weaker competitors die following that strategy. Beer market is a good example, as is the soft drink market. Craft brewers or local drinks cannot compete at all without making huge investments to expand markets and get shelf space. By selling to a major company, they gain access to other markets and consumers benefit by expanding their options. Otherwise, Goose would remain a niche brand in Chicago, and you wouldn't get it in Buffalo or LA. Again, tell me how the consumer doesn't benefit from having their $15 case of Bud or $10 six pack of Goose nationwide? Consumers benefit not just from cheapest prices, but from having a wider variety of choices, and a higher probability that the product will be available to buy for a long time.

Out of the playoffs and bad attitude finally wore off on the coaching staff?

So is Khari Lee

Good vibrations, indeed

What did the OP say?

You haven't described the ills of size other than size of its own. Show how size equates to consumer harm. I've said that government shouldn't be in the business of protecting individual companies, because the government is not in a good spot to know which companies to help or hurt. Speaking of strawmen, you're assuming that bigger companies don't provide additional choices to the consumer, while the data is contrary to your position. Is consumer in a better or worse position after Goose Island is sold to AmBev?

They are "their" platforms

How does this square with Russian collusion? Is the thinking that Putin wants to increase his nuclear arsenal, so he got Trump to revoke all nuclear agreements and Putin can begin to rearm?