Jump to content

GG

Community Member
  • Posts

    31,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GG

  1. You would be incorrect.
  2. Jeff Zucker
  3. I admit that I was wrong ... when I referenced 3% as the wishful growth rate. Old age is getting the better of me. As I reflect now, the discussions were about 2% growth rates and 8% unemployment rates being the "new normal" Kind of fun going back into the memory banks to hear the explanations of how we should get used to European-style economies of low growth and high unemployment. Because that's what enlightened countries do. This was a doozy
  4. There's far greater instances of you changing the plot line than Greggy, evidenced by above. The entire premise of using a Watergate quote is to tie a President to an alleged crime. If you are now saying that it was an innocuous quote, you're being disingenuous. You started the thread right at the beginning of the Trump Russia collusion hysteria, meaning there's intent to use that specific quote in that context at that time. After 2.5 years, it's a big fat, never mind. Don't worry about Trump, look at the Facebook ads and unsubstantiated news bout some rigged voting machines.
  5. Do you see any irony in your post?
  6. And in the intervening 2.5 years facts have come out that blew the Watergate theory out of the water, yet you twist the narrative to make it seem $200k in fake FB ads is serious election meddling. You’d be taken more seriously if you were consistent and honest in your opinions. Even Greggy admits to being wrong when facts don’t back his position.
  7. Did they forget that the biggest reason for their win in 2018 is now wearing red, white and blue and is looking for revenge?
  8. You're crowing about the only administration in history that didn't hit 3% following a recession and poo poohing 2.9% growth in year 9 of a recovery, following downswing in growth.
  9. Who wrote this, and does it have the same meaning as the quotes above?
  10. Speaking of context, the discussion about never hitting a 3% growth rate was to excuse away sub-2.0% growth following a major recession. Can a dead cat bounce higher than 1.5%? What's more impressive, hitting above 2.5% eight years into a recovery, or barely scraping 2.0% within 3 years of a recovery after pumping it with over $3 trillion in stimulous?
  11. The video is a recap of morons pining for a recession, not anyone who understands the topic saying that we're in a recession.
  12. Do your synapses ever produce a point? Show me where any semi-rational commentator has said that we're in a recession now.
  13. Bummer that I missed it. Definitely heard them.
  14. Trump didn't do anything extraordinary, other than pick the low hanging economic fruit that the Obama Summers of Recovery ©️™️ failed to deliver. It wasn't long ago that we were told to get used to perpetual sub 3.0% GDP growth rates and swooning labor participation rates of an aging country. Funny how the narrative changed. The context is that the most tepid recovery after a recession was running out of steam by 2016, and the renewed expansion was due to nothing more than allowing the private sector to do what it does best. To borrow a phrase, the government didn't build it. You would be correct
  15. Data without context is just a collection of numbers. Tell me which hat you wore for each Summer of Recovery?™️©️
  16. I think Sunday games are available after 11PM, not 4PM.
  17. What? Please don't redefine racism to include every slight and insult.
  18. Because those are not well worn tropes. You can certainly imply a racist meaning to them, but it's not something that's been used for years, decades and centuries, like Omar's comments.
  19. Triangulation gets pretty darn close because that was the requirement to ensure E911 calls from cellphones.
  20. Let's try an analogy You're a Wizards fan, and didn't like the team's effort in yesterday's game. Next day, you post a cartoon of a guy in a Wizards uniform sleeping on the bench surrounded by watermelon rinds and chicken bones. Will you be seen as a racist or critic of the team? After all you didn't target a specific player.
  21. So he's the combination of the bad qualities of Schobel and Kelsay?
  22. Both tweets use the common anti-semitic tropes, under the guise of criticizing Israel.
  23. Not just by GPS, but by triangulating the location data off the cell towers. In short, if you use your cellphone, Google knows where you are within a few feet.
  24. Because humans evolved by discovering that other species taste better and don't put up as big of a fight to get eaten?
  25. I don't think there would be as big of an issue if this is how he would be used. I just found it odd that there was a big PR blitz praising Murphy's play, when the eye test didn't pass it.
×
×
  • Create New...