Jump to content

ndirish1978

Community Member
  • Posts

    8,249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ndirish1978

  1. Schefter tweeted that the Raiders were nuts about him
  2. He postured this week and said people were misreading his comments
  3. next picks- Clausen, Iupati/Bulaga
  4. Williams said it was a joke between him and the commissioner
  5. Cant believe we didnt take Suh! Terrible!
  6. We better not take Spiller over Bulaga
  7. Okung, Clausen, Iupati
  8. Bulaga is a RT isnt he?
  9. Ok thanks. I hate Seattle preemptively now then
  10. I thought Okung was a lock there if he was available
  11. who takes okung ahead of us now? Oakland?
  12. Wow, berry here to the chiefs?
  13. Not gonna happen Okung in gone here
  14. probably 26- everyone but us
  15. seattle goes berry I think
  16. I dont think we get our OT in the 1st. I like Spiller, but I really dont like taking a RB in the 1st even if he's great. We have too many glaring needs
  17. Gotta appreciate it when people appear grateful for the opportunity to play in the NFL
  18. Why do people think we will trade down? Yeah different front office, but SAME OWNER. I don't see it.
  19. Reading that proves to me I know nothing. The most disappointing pick for me in the draft was our best one.
  20. You have an amazing talent for identifying sarcasm... ***holds up sarcasm sign*** Your "reality" must be a boring place.
  21. Longshot. Remember when he tried to introduce Pos at the presser? He stumbled over his name like 3 times and finally just said "well i call him Paul." I would be surprised if the man still eats solid food.
  22. Wrong. Yes, the Bills should have taken Ngata, but the pick was not bad because they "reached" the pick was bad because it was a poor choice to take him at all. I hate the "reach" label because it presumes you operate in a vacuum where: 1) You can trade back to a later spot if you want that player 2) pre-draft rankings are absolute and irrefutable. Ryan Leaf wasn't considered a reach when he was drafted. The term identifies where a player is projected to be drafted and then evaluates if the player had good value for where they were taken. The fundamental flaw with the system is that players are rarely drafted at the spot they are projected to go in. Other posts have addressed this issue. The best of the best prognosticators are wrong 75% of the picks they make. The only time I would think of using the term reach is if the player would have definitely been available with the team's next pick.
  23. Timmmah! We're dying here. You don't need to give us any concrete facts, at least post some conjecture and speculation about what you think the Bills COULD do. I'd rather hear it from you than from someone who knows nothing about the Bills, but read a scouting report and has a TV show. We're dying here!
  24. Cool link. Thanks for sharing!
×
×
  • Create New...