I wish it could be as original, or mature, as resorting to calling someone "stupid," or adding a "d" to the end of his screen name.
Oh and for the record, I've given you at least TEN reasons why the stock should "go to the moon," again over the long-term. Given your self-professed genius, I can only assume you missed them, since you couldn't be so stupid as to have read them and forgotten them. Unless of course they got lost in the sea of "it's all about the balance sheet, stupid!" sloshing around in your head.
If at work I had access to the market continuously I'd probably do a little more day-trading and might have even taken advantage of today's events; but alas, I don't. So I'm content with my "stupid" $9K profit, even after today's events. However what I find interesting is that, despite that analyst's downgrade in the stock from "hold" to "sell," which led to today's drop, he also increased the target price of the stock from $5.8 to $7. That's an increase in valuation of $1.54B! The funny thing is, the balance sheet looks EXACTLY THE SAME TODAY AS IT DID YESTERDAY. What gives? Is he "stupid?"