Ramius

SHHHHHHHHH!!! pointing out the fact that early round corners often produce good results for a fraction of the salary that FA corners do is not logic that is freely accepted around these parts. Those pointing out this logic are often persecuted and hung. Keep an eye on your mailbox. The underground CB group will contact you with our meeting times.

the guard spots could use an upgrade, but i dont see us spending a higher pick on a C. From all reports, Fowler has been doing quite a good job, and is a "leader" of the offensive line. I dont see him being replaced. A new center is gold in the eyes of TBDers, but fool's godl in the eyes of OBD.

i've always backed JP. Hes frustrated the hell out me at times, but i haven never tossed in the towel on him.

what would you call it when said "teacher" and his points have been refuted by dozens of posters, thousands of published scientists, and mainstream math? Also, what would you call it when said "teacher" cannot define the very words he is using in his attempt to explain a given phenomenon?

I think you're wrong here. The transition tag give the Bills the right to match any contract offer to clements. If we decline to match, we get nothing. This was how we signed TKO from cincy. The seahwaks transition tagged hutch last year, and only lost him because of the poison pill in his contract. Transition tagging nate seems like a viable strategy with nothing to lose.

go away. go piss on someone elses parade.

JDG was whining about how since yesterday's game wasnt a sellout, we should remember December 17, 2006 as "the day buffalo lost the bills". I think his thread has fallen to page 3.

Holcomb's ability to hold a clipboard is second to none...except maybe shane matthews.

It probably doesnt help either that the Bills are pinning their hopes on "arguably the worst QB in the history of the NFL"

I too was ready to strangle roscoe after that retarded decision on the punt return. It must be a UM thing, cuz i have seen willis do it a few times too. But remember roscoe has made some plays this year. Was worth he a 2nd round pick, probably not no. But hate donahoe for drafting him, dont hate roscoe for being picked. its not his fault.

What scares me about isnt the Bills not makig an offer, but Danny Snyder showing an interest in nate. Snyder wouldnt have a problem tossing 70 mil, 25 mil SB at clements and freeny. Rumor is that snyder is already fueling up 3 private jets to go for freeny, clements, and briggs on day 1 of FA.

simon comes to mularkey's defense in 5...4...3...2...

Eh, its not too bad. the bleach will kill the syphilis, so its bascially the same as drinking bleach. No danger of an STD.

did you read the other 50+ pages in the 2 previous threads?

Well that all depends. Lets say that you take a group of people. This group of people multiplies 3*4. When the results come back, you find that on average, the group determined that 3*4 = 12. So you decide to test the group again. One would think that the group would again determine that 3*4 = 12. But this isnt the case. After the first test, you have some people who determined that 3*4 = 12. But you also have a % of people that got lucky or unlucky when doing their math. There are going to be a bunch of "lucky" folks who thought that 3*4 = 11, but due to error, got lucky and determined the answer as 12. There is also going to be an "unlucky" group who thought 3*4 = 13, but got unlucky and determined the answer is 12. Given a normal distribution of answers, there are going to be a larger number of lucky 11's than there unlucky 13's. When taking the test again, the true values of the participants answers will appear. This is called regression to the mean. So while you may THINK that 3*4 = 12, regression to the mean due to error shows us that in reality, when you multiply 3*4, the answer will be less than 12.

prayers...

pwned

Thank you. At least someone agrees with me on this. Re: Schobel, the guy is friggin hilarious. just a down home good 'ol southern boy. Just keep on piling up the sacks AS, and those deserved pro bowls will come.

Tough choice. All 3 definitely bring a special brand of retard to the table. But, if i vote, will my vote regress to the mean and thus be rendered worthless?

Fanball does the same, for only $60 per season. I have used both, had sportsline for a few years, and have had fanball for the last 4 years. Fanball >> Sportsline, escpecially in price.

Pull holcombs rooster out of your ear and listen. I already stated the 2 possible outcomes. 1. rolling whatever you determine as a success (rolling a 2, or maybe a 5, or maybe rolling a double digit number) 2. not rolling those outcomes, hence a failure By my count, that is 2 categories, success and failure, which works for a binomial distribution. Seems to me like i understood the links. If you read my above post an continue to spew your sh--, that proves you cannot understand what someone types and clearly have no understanding of mathematics.

we posted links and i clearly stated why you were wrong. But one again: 1. you choose to ignore it, because it proves you wrong 2. you dont comprehend the situation enough to reasonably discuss it We are right, you are wrong. But keep on arguing. It fun lighting you up like a Christmas tree.

see, you're wrong.

Now you cant even understand a binomial distribution. Take a look at it moron. There are 2 possible outcomes, success or failure. In a coin flipping case, the 2 possible outcomes are NOT heads or tails. The binomial distribution says that whatever you designate, say heads, is a success, and that other outcomes (tails in the coin case) are failures. When throwing a pair of dice, designate the outcome you are looking for to determine the probability of that outcome as a success, and all other outcomes are failures. Hence, if i want the probability of throwing a 2-4, rolling a 2, or 3, or 4 is considered a success, while rolling anything else is considered a failure. See, 2 outcomes when throwing a pair of dice, success or failure. The fact that you cant comprehend what they were saying about a pair of outcomes, success and failure, and that they didnt mean an event with only 2 possible final outcomes, such as heads/tails, shows what kind of ignorant !@#$tard you are in the field of mathematics.

Sorry, rolling a pair of dice is the perfect example of a binomial distribution, as noted above by blue fire. We'll just add this to the growing epic that is "things holcombs arm doesnt know jack sh-- about" I believe we are up to roughly 3,462, but that could simply be measurement error.