Jump to content

Coach Tuesday

Community Member
  • Posts

    18,856
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Coach Tuesday

  1. I'm sure he would love to come here for backup money and be a backup to Willis McGahee instead of going to Philadelphia where he could start for a successful, established team.

     

    Is there ANY crazy idea that doesn't get its own thread on this Board?

  2. Personally, I don't like those ratings things, it's all pretty high schoolish and cliquish. And I don't know why two-thirds of the responses in this thread keep harping on hardfast rules and enforcement. I never implied or suggested that. I think they think they're funny.  0:)

    590041[/snapback]

     

    I think perhaps there are two prevailing views regarding what a sports message board is supposed to be:

     

    1) a means of ascertaining an objective truth through the collective commentary. Sort of like slowly chipping away at a stone until a beautiful sculpture is revealed, this camp wants each post to be its own unique contribution to the Truth that the thread eventually discovers;

     

    2) an outlet for sports fans who, although passionate about their team, don't have too much free time and thus can't be expected to slog through all 18 pages of a thread entitled "Sherman to be named Bills head coach" before posting their idea about that topic.

     

    I'm guessing you might fall into category 1. I fall into category 2. I apologize in advance if I repost things - if so, please ignore my post (if you don't already as a matter of course). I try not to rehash things already stated, especially when starting a new thread. But I simply can't promise I will take the time every time I post to account for every single idea that has already been offered.

  3. Why not let the community "vote on" or "rate" individual posters and/or threads, like some other message boards do? I prefer market self-regulation to leftist rule-making, command-economy interventionism. More efficient, and more friendly.

     

    (sorry if already posted)

     

    (why not just accept peoples' apologies in advance, i.e., "sorry if already posted"?)

  4. Then maybe the team shuld have paid DJ more. Or hired a coach worth more.  :lol:

    585325[/snapback]

     

    Dude move on. The Bills are in one of the smallest markets in the NFL. There is no salary cap for coaches. THEY ARE NOT A PUBLIC ENTITLEMENT. What do you expect Ralph to do? The market will dictate that the big-market teams will push coaching salaries up to and past the point that the small market teams can rationally afford. The only way the small market teams are unaffected is if they have a filthy rich, irrational owner who cares more about winning than being solvent. I'm sorry, if that's your expectation of Ralph, it is unreasonable. That's not how the business world does or should operate. I've heard little to suggest that Sherman was that much more qualified than Jauron that he definitely should have been hired, and I'm not going to fault the Bills for not insisting on paying Jauron more even though he was willing to settle for less. Get real.

     

    Also, Bates also turned down Houston, IMO for similar reasons - and Bob McNair is even wealthier than Ralph.

  5. I think so...

     

    FIRST CHOICE: Mularkey (what does it say that they wanted Mularkey more than Jauron?)

     

    SECOND CHOICE: Levy (at least, he was his own second choice)

     

    THIRD CHOICE: Sherman (just a hunch here, I think he was the guy but talks broke down over the weekend; no source, just my gut from what I've heard)

     

    FOURTH CHOICE: Dick.

  6. He likes the hiring of DJ, said when he was with Chicago, he had very little talent to work with.

    579876[/snapback]

     

    Phew.

     

    Sign me up for $1000 in season tickets. Hell, how about a luxury box? Also, I think I'm going to buy oodles of merchandise on top of that. In fact, I think maybe I'll purchase a commercial where I talk about how happy I am with this hiring.

  7. That would be nice but I highly doubt the Bills would interview for the OC and DC positions without the HC there.

    576477[/snapback]

     

    Well I agree, I'm sure they'd give Sherman the chance to meet with these guys and interview them himself - but they'd rely on the HC interviews as a preliminary interview and highly recommend to Sherman that he hire them.

  8. No source, just speculatin'. If that happens, Marv will have assembled in two weeks a more experienced, qualified and exciting group of coaches than Donahoe put together in 5 years.

     

    Wow.

     

     

     

    ** Disclaimer ** Admittedly my earlier posts bashed the idea of Sherman when his name was first thrown out there. Well, I was wrong, or at least the Packers fans who so graciously posted here have changed my mind. The guy is likeable and prepared, and seems to make halftime adjustments from time to time - something GW and MM never bothered to do (their game plan was: 1) pound head against wall 2) repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat...).

×
×
  • Create New...