Billz4ever

It was not 10 degrees hotter. I even looked it up on the weather almanac. Air temp was 88 last year, 89 this year with the same dewpoint (humidity).

I never heard it and Josh never said anything about not feeling great on Kyle Brandt's Basement. He specifically said he felt a little sore, but physically he was fine. I think people are making a lot of assumptions that are being turned into statements that were never said.

What? The Hurricane had absolutely NOTHING to do with our game. Literally nothing. And last year, when we beat them 35-0, the temp was within ONE degree of this game with identical humidity. The Bucs literally evacuated to Miami. https://www.buccaneers.com/news/bucs-evacuate-to-miami-week-4-kansas-city-chiefs-hurricane-ian

Because some people need an excuse to try and explain how it was the heat and not the Bills inability to put the ball in the endzone, despite multiple trips into Miami territory, that was the reason for the loss.

I thought our punting situation was going to be a nightmare after what happened, but Martin has come in and made our punting game stellar. Not that we do it much, but when we do, we can't count on a good outcome. I actually prefer Martin to that person that shall not be named because Martin is known for his ability to pin the opponent deep, where the other dude really just had a monster leg.

That was the best part of that hold. Like why don't you make it a little more obvious you're guilty. lol

I don't even think Mahomes will be the key in the game. Of course we have to do our best to try and contain him, but I think the Chief's running game is more important here. If the Chiefs are able to run the ball on us the way they did against Tampa, there is no doubt in my mind we lose that game.

The Diggs trade had a lot of hype and expectations, but not nearly as much as what happened when Terrell Owens came to buffalo. It was so bad when Owens came, the response was literally embarrassing. Buffalo gave Owens the key to the city for cryin out loud. And in reality, Diggs has meant 10X as much to this org than Owens could ever have dreamed of.

No big surprise there. His brain was scrambled eggs before the Cincy game.

I prefer Shakir more anyway and did before this week's game. Shakir reminds me of a more athletic Beasley. Crowder never impressed me and doesn't have the shiftiness of a Beasley or Shakir. Crowder was always meh to me at Washington and with the Jets. Not sure why we signed him anyway even though I wish him a speedy recovery. Shakir just needs to remember to block when he's supposed to.

They all do, but when you hesitate, and then decide to hit him anyway after the ball is gone, that is a penalty. We got flagged last week for clearly trying to hold up and avoid the collision. We got a dude this week who hesitates and then makes a conscious decision to NOT try and avoid the hit and instead decides to engage the QB and hit him after the ball is gone. And now it's like you want to argue the latter isn't really a penalty when I've seen lesser than that called for roughing.

So why are we defending the zebras then if it was a horribly called game? Who benefited the most shouldn't matter. The best part of it is how the blocker put his hands up after like he didn't do anything after blatantly holding him for several yards as Jackson blew by him.

Sorry, I may have understated that just a bit. 😁

You are spot on. They let a team keep getting away with it, they will keep doing it until it starts getting called. The Patriots secondary was known for getting away with holding receivers religiously and getting away with it for a couple seasons.

I love getting to mute people who decide to double down on their own stupidity. When you're defending the zebras for a terrible game of officiating, time to do a little self-reflection.

I never said a word about the heat in Miami, and better yet, defended it as a case of one team being acclimatized better than the other. Now, it's quite obvious you're willing to just make crap up as you go. You're now doubling down on a horribly called game. Hilarious.

LMAO, you've been provided undisputable evidence of holding and you're claiming rules were applied consistently. The only thing you've managed to accomplish here is to defend zebras for a horrible called game. I'm still waiting for you to admit who your relative is on that squad.

There's no such thing as "offsets". Offsetting penalties are only when penalties occur by both teams on the same play. Penalties, depending on when called, can have much greater impact on the game then others. According to you apparently, they are all the same. They are not. You've backed yourself into a corner now defending a horribly called game and your only response is to now say they just "offset" each other, when nothing could be further from the truth. I expect better from NFL-level officiating.

I've said at least 3 times now it was a horribly called game. You seem to not be wanting to take yes for an answer for some reason and just keep defending the zebras.

Why are you defending such a badly called game? Which zebra is your relative?

Sorry, but pointing to another call is not a valid defense of an obvious hold not called.

LMAO, I post a pic of a clearly obvious hold and this dude is defending the zebras like his Dad is the referee.

No, that's not a "level playing field" because not all penalties are the same and when and where they are called and where they are NOT CALLED makes a huge difference. You seem to want to defend these refs for a terrible game. This squad should have disciplinary actions taken against them for such a badly called game.

If my only job was to call things like this and I'm missing calls this obvious, I would get fired. These were obvious holds that everyone on TV were watching in real time with refs right there and no call. They can penalize referee squads and the amount of bad calls in this game seriously warrants such action.

The only thing consistent about the refs in this game is they were consistently bad.