-
Posts
1,519 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by syhuang
-
Josh Allen - week NINE report card
syhuang replied to rayray808's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
-
Week#9 Thread Bills vs. Redskins
syhuang replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
this is interesting that they had a separated call sheets for Haskins previously. Does it mean Haskins didn't/doesn't have a fully grasp of the offense playbook 8 weeks into the season? -
Week#9 Thread Bills vs. Redskins
syhuang replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
Week#9 Thread Bills vs. Redskins
syhuang replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
Week#9 Thread Bills vs. Redskins
syhuang replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
Week#9 Thread Bills vs. Redskins
syhuang replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
AP played through high and low ankle sprains last week against Vikings. -
Trent Williams ends holdout and reports to Skins
syhuang replied to YoloinOhio's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
Trent Williams ends holdout and reports to Skins
syhuang replied to YoloinOhio's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
Week#9 Thread Bills vs. Redskins
syhuang replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
Week#9 Thread Bills vs. Redskins
syhuang replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
Week#9 Thread Bills vs. Redskins
syhuang replied to Chandler#81's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
-
Since you brought up QB rating,
-
Does Beasley’s TD tamp down his growing frustration?
syhuang replied to MAJBobby's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
It looks like a safety was covering Beasley and then turned to Duke's direction after seeing the ball was thrown. Also, that's a good blitz pickup by the o-line and RB. -
Sam Darnold says Jets can be 'unstoppable as an offense' once Chris Herndon returns https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/27867225/sam-darnold-says-jets-unstoppable-offense-once-chris-herndon-returns "Right now, we're just missing Chris [Herndon]. Once all the guys are back together, I think we're unstoppable as an offense -- or we can be," he said, referencing the injured tight end. "It's just up to us and how we execute. It's really up to us how many points we score, I think. I think we're capable of so many points. With our offensive line, too, the way they played last game, with the way we've been running the ball and the way they've been protecting, sky's the limit for us."
-
For this bold statement above, my understanding is that only when the end result is a turnover, the play gets auto-reviewed. In this case, it didn't end up as a turnover so there is no auto-review. Also, from the original article: "PFT has learned that replay review definitely was not involved in this decision", auto review didn't kick in for this particular play.
-
I didn't locate the exact rules in NFL rulebook but found this article relating to it when quickly googling it. Not sure if anything changes afterward. ---------------------------------------------------------- https://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/224822/mike-pereira-wants-to-reveal-nfls-undercover-officiating-program In a conversation this week about his book, "After Further Review," Pereira reiterated and amplified a theory that he first advanced last year -- a premise that makes perfect sense but would undermine the transparency of NFL game administration. According to Pereira, referees regularly receive assistance and advice from replay officials on their wireless headsets, communication that helps them make accurate calls but would be in violation of rules the league itself has published and publicized. "They're never going to come out and admit it because it's not allowed in the rules," he said. "I get that. And I'm not against the notion of trying to get as many calls right as you can, but my only concern is if the rulebook doesn't allow you to do it -- to me, there is a conflict. I get the side of trying to avoid controversy, but I'd rather the rulebook allow it first." ----------------------------------------------------------
-
From the article: PFT has learned that replay review definitely was not involved in this decision. This means that no one should have been talking to any of the officials regarding whether or not the call for pass interference should have been changed, or whether some other penalty should have been called.
-
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/10/14/something-fishy-happened-in-that-texans-chiefs-call/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ It occurred with the Chiefs leading 17-9 in the second quarter, and driving for more with a first down on the Houson 32. Quarterback Patrick Mahomes fired a deep ball to the end zone, and it was intercepted by Texans defensive back Tashaun Gipson. Referee Shawn Hochuli initially informed the fans in the stadium and the TV audience that Texans defensive back Lonnie Johnson Jr. had committed defensive pass interference on Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, with the video showing Johnson grabbing Kelce and driving him into the ground. Then, as the teams were lined up for the next play at the spot of the infraction (the Houston 23), Hochuli and two other officials huddled. During the conversation, one of the other officials clearly can be seen pressing his finger against his ear, it what most likely was an attempt to better hear whatever someone was saying to him. PFT has learned that replay review definitely was not involved in this decision. This means that no one should have been talking to any of the officials regarding whether or not the call for pass interference should have been changed, or whether some other penalty should have been called. After the consultation, Hochuli announced “the contact that was potentially a hold was while the ball was in the air; it is not pass interference, because it was not on the receiver that caught the ball.” While a little clunky on the back end, the point was that the officials concluded, apparently with input from either the replay official or 345 Park Avenue, that the blatant hold on Kelce happened while the ball was in the air, and that Kelce wasn’t the intended receiver — making the ball uncatchable as to him and thus resulting in no interference. But the contact on Kelce seems to have clearly commenced and continued before Mahomes threw the ball. Thus, if there was going to be any type of consultation (even if technically unauthorized by the procedures for helping the officials on the field), someone should have told the officials that Johnson committed defensive holding on Kelce, with the interception nullified and possession given to the Chiefs, first and 10 from the Houston 27. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Go to 1:12 to see one of the officials seems to listen to something. Note that the play wasn't under review. Conspiracy? ?