TheWeatherMan

There’s no doubt that offense isn’t a problem in the playoffs, it’s the Defense. The real debate is to whether it’s: 1. situational coaching and ability to make adjustments. 2. The overall defensive scheme 3. Quality of play / injuries or 4. A little of all the above

Your assumption is correct.

I’d prefer a starting safety over a potential #3, #4 or #5 WR. Praying we’re not going into the season with the same starting safety tandem as last year 🤮.

Commanders vs Bears at #6 is hilarious. That wouldn’t make my top 100.

He’s listed as 6’ 1” on the Bills website Edit: 6’ 4”, I’m blind

Cheaper and provided a red zone target.

So we have 6 receivers on the roster all 6’ 1” or under. In fact we only have two receivers over 6’ 1” and that Shavers and the 7th round rookie. This is going to be fun to watch…aim small miss small Josh.

Reading comprehension man…never said I want to see Ed cut. Simply saying the Bills have the flexibility to do so if they want. Beane is not afraid to take on dead cap, the last two years are prime examples of that.

Agree, but I think they have the flexibility to bail in 2026 if his play tapers off in 25.

More deep research conducted before making and well thought out post. Maybe check the post June 1 cut/trade before posting definitive nonsense? If you took two seconds to look… $9.2M hit the next 3 years with savings of 2M, 15M, 16M. Obviously optimal, but Beane has proven he’s willing take on large cap hits to shed players he no longer wants.

Yes, I’m looking forward to more of your well thought out and thorough posts based on super in depth research 😂

👏🏿 Bravo, that’s a nice and thorough review of FA cap space and draft capital spent on offense vs defense. The focus on the # of picks spent overall as the delineating factor was well thought out. I’m wrong, we’ve obviously prioritized offense over defense the last 7 years because the # of picks spent on offense equal that of the defense…you win buddy. 😂

All expected when you have the best QB in the NFL leading your team. Regular season success has never been a gauge in determining greatness. Being strategically dominated by the same team in the postseason for 4 of the past 5 seasons is not greatness.

It seems like a good idea, until you realize it hasn’t worked for 7 straight years.

We keep losing to the Chiefs because they have better coaches across the board. It’s logical to say we score enough points to be able to beat the Chiefs, the offense isn’t the problem. But when you have greatly prioritized defense the last 7 years with the same net result, maybe it’s time to try something different