cle23
-
Posts
1,409 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by cle23
-
-
1 hour ago, B-Man said:
Very disingenuous. They certainly have become an vastly increased problem recently.
Annnnnnnnnnnnd. Back to the thread.
Hmmm.
REPORT: Paul Pelosi Seen Opening Door for Police on Body Cam Video as Originally Reported.
“So why would NBC News scrub an awkward story about the husband of a House Speaker representing an embattled majority in the weeks before a midterm election to determine control of the House?”
NBC Bay Area reporter Bigad Shaban claimed Wednesday that police body cam footage supports Almaguer’s initial story, “according to a source familiar with the Pelosi investigation who personally viewed the body camera footage.”
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/body-cam-video-paul-pelosi-attack/3076235/
.
It is disingenuous to imply that Biden has caused our opioid crisis when opioids have been a crisis for 10+ years. I am not saying Biden is blameless, but opioids have gotten worse under every President, including Bush, Obama, Trump, and now Biden. Where were you guys blaming Trump as well?
The issue is that opioids are a growing problem, not which President to blame the problem on.
-
23 minutes ago, ChasBB said:
If my memory is any good, seems like some of the most miserable weather games in past decades were 3 point losses to the likes of the Browns & Bengals - 6-to-3 or 16-13 type scores. Would like to see a strong Bills victory this weekend, but just get the W at least.
8-0 Cleveland in the 2007 blizzard game in Cleveland.
-
1 hour ago, KDIGGZ said:
I've seen it happen with my own eyes so I know it happens. So why not close that loophole?
I am all for closing THAT loophole. But not removing all mail in ballots as a way to do it, as you suggested.
-
On 10/28/2022 at 2:29 PM, Bandito said:
LOL. If Biden and his admin did their job at the US Border we wouldn't have as many opioids in this country.
Yes, because opioids have only become a problem recently.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, KDIGGZ said:
Democrats vote by mail at disturbingly high numbers, it's disproportionate. If you can't go to a polling location and show ID then you don't get to vote imo
That is just recently though, not the long term data. The most recent presidential election, yes, it was much higher in democratic percentage, but that is also going along with a lot of the COVID situation, with democratic voters being much more likely to follow the guidelines. Hell, Trump encouraged people to ignore the guidelines, and obviously his voters were disproportionately Republicans. Historically the numbers have been much more even, though they do tend to lean Democrat some.
In 2018, 25% of people voted by mail. Should we just invalidate 25% of votes then?
25 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:Yes because then there is no fraud. If you don't care to go vote then you shouldn't care who wins
You do know that mail in voting started in the Civil War era, right? But somehow only recently it became "fraudulent."
-
30 minutes ago, SCBills said:
Having 9 House Races undecided, over a week after the election, when leadership position jockeying and orientations are going on is absurd.
Having almost two months of early voting is a joke. Over 70% of PA’s votes were in before the debate. Katie Hobbs never even debated Kari Lake once. Debates should be mandatory in an election, and no votes should be cast before one has occurred.
Having a substantial percentage of machines fail on Election Day in a razor thin margin state, causing massive lines and confusion is unacceptable.
If trust in our elections continues to erode, we will no longer have a functioning country. If no changes are made, R’s will eventually figure out how to match Dems in legal ballot harvesting, and we will have two months of ballot harvest machinery in play by both sides followed by weeks of sorting out of the votes. That is absolutely opening up the process to fraud and distrust.
Our system in a handful of states is currently a joke. Everyone knows it. Even you.
I agree with most of what you said, except this:
"Debates should be mandatory in an election, and no votes should be cast before one has occurred. "
The debates are pointless. 95% of people have already decided well before the debate who they will vote for, mostly by whatever letter is by their name. Also, the debates are pointless in the sense that it is all just personal attacks on the other candidate and very, very little actual substance. I wish there was a rule that you can only speak as to what you plan to accomplish, with no attacks on each other at all. But that'll never happen as it'll drive down ratings.
19 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:Voter fraud alert:
I know people that do this for their entire family (1 person filled it all out democrat for their grandma, grandpa, mom, dad, 2 kids). Their kids have the social skills of a rock and I doubt they can spell democrat let alone care who is running. Grandma and grandpa don't know what day it is. Wife apparently wasn't going to vote, didn't like either choice. Then he bragged that the Dems had 6 votes coming in. Now times that by millions of ballots. If you can't be bothered to go down to the polling station to show ID and vote in person then you shouldn't get a vote. Simple as that
This isn't just a Democrat issue though. It happens on both sides. And the issue there being that there are millions of legitimate votes that wouldn't get counted if that was the case.
-
39 minutes ago, Bill from NYC said:
First of all, refrain from calling me names.
Next, your team sucks. Alabama could have lost 5 games this season with their worst team in many years. Instead, they won 3 of those games, including a road win over your Mississppi team
. Otoh, a weak OSU lost 48-0 to a so-so team. Not good. 🤣
Think what you will about the Big 12. Tell yourself how good they are, despite the parade of teams leaving it.
Dream away.
To be fair, teams aren't leaving because of the quality, they are leaving for money.
-
10 minutes ago, WotAGuy said:
Nooooooooo! Don’t let the Browns wear white! Josh will never see those DBs in the snow!
I could honestly see them having both teams wear dark uniforms if the snow is as bad as it calls for.
-
14 minutes ago, ytownblofan said:
Has the run killed us at times over the last 3 games? Yes, most definitely. But once you break it down, its more that they have serious issues stopping the run one one drive rather than their run defense being putrid. There is a reason the Bills are still the 6th ranked run defense per DVOA.
vs the Jets, the Bills gave up 174 on the ground. Putrid. However, lets break it down:
Zac Wilson had 5 rushes for 48
Carter had 12 for 76
Robinson had 13 for 48
A mix of WR had 4 for 26
The Jets rushed 8 times for 73 on that last drive. Meaning prior to that drive the Jets were rushing at a clip of 26 for 101, an average of 3.8. Now obviously that last drive was a dagger, and killed us, but up to that drive they defended the run reasonably well.
vs the Vikings, the Bills gave up 147 on the ground.
Dalvin - 14 for 119
Cousins - 6 for 12
Mattison - 3 for 11
Ham - 1 for 3
Osborn - 1 for 2
Outside of the 1 drive that consisted of 1 rush for 81 yards, the Bills held them to 66 yards rushing on 24 attempts, an average of 2.75. Like the Jets game, this one drive definitely hurt, and is part of the entire picture, however, outside of that drive, I think any of us would take that run defense.
The Green Bay game definitely was the worst in regards to our rush defense. However, hearing from Von and others on the defense, it sounded like the Bills were allowing the run to happen and continued to defend the pass, letting the Packers run the clock out on their own.
Have the Bills been great against the run? Obviously no, they have not. Do they have serious issues? No, I don't think so. They need to clean up some mistakes, but I don't believe its a dire situation. Could the Browns kill us on the ground? Undoubtedly. Chubb is a beast. That being said, given the weather, I believe the Bills will sell out to stop the run and dare Jacoby to beat us. Much like they did against the Titans when they held them to 27 for 80 yards.
But that is literally how every team handles the run. Bad teams rarely give up 4-5 yards every carry, but they consistently give up chunk yardage. It's like saying "Outside of the 2 late 4th quarter touchdown, the defense only gave up 10 points." You have to take the whole game into account. Chubb averages 5.5 yards a carry, but gets plenty of 1-3 yards runs to get there.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, Big Turk said:
Or potentially Browns vs. Bills in Detroit.
Potential blizzard or?
-
7 minutes ago, DrBob806 said:
Well that stat indeed sucks, but be careful.The Browns sent Mayfield packing for a variety of reasons, one being interceptions. Look at that mess now.
And most of it has nothing to do with Brissett. Plus, it's been 9 games with a backup.
Clevelands defense is the main issue right now. Talent, but bad communication.
-
40 minutes ago, FrenchConnection said:
You act like Frank Reich is the only backup QB to ever win a game and that Case never played a game before playing in the Preseason with the Bills. Keenem, just last year, started two games for the Browns. He was 47/72 (65%), 462 yards with 3 TDs and 1 INT. That's good stuff for a backup QB.
Not that it matters much, but Keenum had 375 yards in those 2 games, not 462. The rest was spot duty in other games.
Keenum is a decent backup, and can manage a game, but he likely won't win you the game. In the 2 starts for Cleveland, the Browns had 335 yards rushing and 3 TDs as well.
-
1 hour ago, EasternOHBillsFan said:
Patrick Mahomes threw it SIXTY EIGHT TIMES in a 20-17 win.
RUSHING:
Mahomes: 63
Everyone else: 14
I think someone ELSE may need a running game as well, but hey, it's the Chiefs, so they get a free pass.
The Chiefs are in the same boat. The issue being with either team is that if the QB has any kind of off night, or even just an average night, it makes it extremely difficult to win games.
Every team is stronger in either run/pass. But when your offense is 80% predicated on 1 player, or on the pass, it makes game planning that much easier.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:
Still need to be able to run for those times when your QB looks like steaming dog-*****I agree. Just saying that a 4.6 YPC average is not a great indicator of a good RB without context. CMC was the Panther's offense. Singletary is almost an afterthought, so when he does run, he get less focus, which can lead to more yardage.
-
On 11/6/2022 at 4:29 PM, Augie said:
I’m not saying Motor is CMC, but Singletary has a higher career average YPC with 4.7 vs 4.6. Pretty large sample size, too. The RB isn’t the problem. It is the OL. Period. Yes, an upgrade would be great, but I’m not blaming the RB.
You can't compare their YPC though, without context. CMC was the focal point of the offense in Carolina, and didn't have much help. They have decent WRs but no one to get them the ball. Singletary is the 3rd-5th option in Buffalo, so teams don't game plan around him.
-
6 minutes ago, Virgil said:
Yeah, this is a joke. I'm sorry, but the guy pressing charges can kick rocks
I don't think people should press charges for every little situation, but I'm fine with this one. If some dude walked up, punched you, and walked away, and you had no "real" injuries, it still warrants punishment. Adams was completely unwarranted in what he did to a guy who had zero to do with him at all.
I'm not saying Adams should be punished severely either, but it warrants some punishment. It honestly is probably a way for the guy to press a settlement out of him.
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
I mean I don't believe a word out of Jim Harbaugh's mouth. If he told me today was Monday I'd throw my calendar away and presume it was wrong.
What makes you say that? Just curious.
-
2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:
Surprised it came this early. I was told by someone in the know to expect the Panthers to chase a big name when the inevitable Rhule firing came. Watch Sean Payton and Jim Harbaugh.
Harbaugh claimed his interview with Minnesota last year were his last look into the pros. Obviously that could be a bunch of crap, but He claims he is done chasing the NFL.
-
6 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:
Look at the pic of his car. Do you know anyone that did that to a car doing 65 in a 45?
I don't think you understand how fast 65 truly is, and that most sports cars crumple by design. All I am going by is the reported information, not random speculation.
-
6 hours ago, KDIGGZ said:
He was at 65 when he crashed, more likely going 100 and slammed on the brakes. Or do you think he was casually driving 65 and then flipped one of the best handling sports cars a dozen times? If so I have a bridge to sell you.
You are starting from a point where it's possible or likely that he said that. That's the Bigfoot example. You believe Bigfoot exists or do you start from the point of "haha yeah right there is no Bigfoot" prove me wrong?
Everything about your points is speculation. You assume everything about what Garrett did to be on the far wrong side. Everyone else it pointing out that maybe it's not that, or not quite that bad, and you say "prove me wrong" yet have no evidence of what you're saying either.
-
1 hour ago, KDIGGZ said:
No he's a garbage person because he destroyed the name of Mason Rudolph by saying he said something racist to him and that's why he tried to hit him with a helmet. There are people that still think he did. This just adds to the laundry list of why this guy is garbage. He almost killed that girl and he takes zero responsibility for it.
There is no way to know for sure what was said with the helmet thing and Rudolph. To be clear, nothing Rudolph would have said would make it ok to swing the helmet, but there is no way to say for sure what happened. There is also pictures of Rudolph hitting Garrett in the groin more than once, so he definitely wasn't 100% innocent either.
I think you're blowing this WAY out of proportion. He was driving too fast for sure. But 65 in a 45 isn't some insane speed. He wasn't being entirely reckless. He wasn't drunk. Hell, half of NFL fans drive home from games in worse shape than he would be.
-
1
-
-
51 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said:
Agreed. My problem with him is that he lies and gets away with it and then everyone kisses his butt and nominates him for man of the year and all of that and meanwhile he is a piece of garbage. Good football player, not a good human being
Fake outrage much? I pretty much guarantee that every one on this site has sped, and most have probably went 100+ or close to it. Is it incredibly stupid? Absolutely. Does that make him a bad person? Not necessarily. If the animal wasn't hit, then Garrett is legally responsible and will be cited. If the animal is hit, likely he would still be responsible but it can vary as well. But that doesn't mean he lied about it. They can tell pretty quickly whether you were speeding or not, so it isn't like lying about it would help anything. You get cited either way.
Garrett does a ton of work in the community and a ton to help kids and such. He made several poor choices driving recently it seems, and he needs to correct them. But stop with the "he's a garbage person" because of this. No drinking, no drugs, both people with seat belts on. Everybody has some bad to their name.
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, mannc said:
You’re missing the point: I’d be fine with fewer regular season home games in December/January in Buffalo. Nothing you can do about the playoffs…
Right, but I am saying you can't just change it because it may happen. Is Florida typically very hot in September? Sure, but It was 88+ in Ohio a week or so ago too.
If the temperature is insanely high, I get delaying the game until later that day or the evening, but you can't change how the entire 32 team schedule works because a couple stadiums could be hot, or cold. Weather is a part of football and it always has been. Rain, heat, cold, snow, wind. It's all part of the game.
-
44 minutes ago, JESSEFEFFER said:
There is no quantitative time component to completing the process. Two steps with the ball and the ball is tucked to the chest when the defender makes the play on it. I would like to see the complete play from more angles but the steps and the tuck should be all is needed. I would like to hear an official breakdown but I agree the challenge is likely not to go their way.
He didn't take "two steps" though. He did get 2 feet down, but he didn't take 2 steps then. But if Davis had fallen over without the defender and lost control on the way to the ground, or even when hitting the ground, it's not a catch. You have to maintain control through the catch. He caught it with 2 feet down, but immediately had the ball slapped out.
40 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:The tuck was not completed. You either need a football move or the time to complete a football move. In this instance I'd say he was still in the process of tucking it away when it was knocked out. Incomplete. Similarly if that is in the field of play I think it is called incomplete rather than a catch and a fumble.
I like your second statement here. If that exact thing happens at the 50 yard line, it's incomplete and not a fumble.
Speaker Pelosi's Home Has Been Attacked
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
I agree that it would be wrong to blame Trump for CAUSING the virus. I do think he mishandled it once more information was known, but who knows how each President would have handled it. I also think his personality and constant blame game and administration issues were the cause of him losing the election, with the handling of the virus a part of that.
I am not a Biden fan. Gun to my head, if I had to pick between he and Trump, I would probably pick Biden, but I did not vote for either in the past election because I did not feel either was worthy of the office.