Rock-A-Bye Beasley

I respectfully ask that you leave me alone. I'm arguing on a message board with two posters about the same issue. Others are also taking my side, yet you're singling me out. Nope! ...But they don't fall apart because of money when the team trying to acquire the player has more than enough cap space. I'm glad Beane tried to get Brown. If he backed off because he didn't want to give him a two year deal in two years where we have more than enough cap space then i'm disappointed.

Right because the Bills didn't really have the cap space this year or next.

The burden of proof isn't on me. That's my point. Shady stated it as a fact.

Don't worry. I'm not upset. Maybe focus on yourself or someone else that's arguing with me.

wrong. You obviously agree with them. That's ok, but I question your intelligence if that's the case. Royale and shady (who brought it up in the first place) on one side and c biscuit and me on the other. Yet you chose to quote me and say i'm upset.

Why do YOU care? You took the time to respond to me. I'm not the one who cares. Why are you quoting me and not the people who are claiming the deal wasn't done. They posted THAT first. I'm simply correcting them, followed by a back and forth. If you really don't care it should be equally annoying to see either side's argument. It WAS reported the deal was done. It has never been refuted clearly. The Beane quote doesn't say there was no deal. No, you prove to me "with concrete evidence" that they were wrong.

Looks like he's back at practice. So we will see. The Steelers were pretty good while he was there.

It's more likely that they weren't wrong. Why is that so hard for YOU to understand?

Why do you say that? don't you think it's possible he plays week 1 and has a good year? John Brown has 1 catch in preseason, it doesn't matter.

Yes, why would they report it if it wasn't agreed upon by PIT and BUF. You tell me.

No I'm just putting words in your mouth like you're doing to me. If they reported the deal as agreed upon bu BUF and PIT, but it wasn't, then they must have had a reason to lie. What do you think is that reason?

Why would they report that as a done deal though? That is what some people are still claiming happened.

aww you ok?

What really can you believe maaaaaaan??? Get real, they traded for him. Unless YOU are saying it's a conspiracy?

Which one is it? I commend him for trying to get the best WR in football when WR was our biggest need. He may have gotten lucky, we will see if AB misses a significant portion of the regular season. At this point I'd still bet he shows up week 1 or sooner.

Good. You're delusional and taking what you want to hear from Beane's statement.

Are you putting words in my mouth? How many times have you heard of a trade being FINALIZED in the NFL only to have it fall apart? They traded for him. You have zero evidence that they didn't. Everyone except delusional Bills fans agrees it was a done deal until AB said no.

What is that supposed to prove? Beane said he was pissed of and defended the city. Doesn't change the fact that he traded for Brown then he didn't want to report. https://billswire.usatoday.com/2019/03/08/buffalo-bills-brandon-beane-antonio-brown-moved-on/ Yeah they moved on because he didn't want to play in Buffalo. It would never have been reported as a done deal if it wasn't agreed to by PIT and BUF.

oops meant to say Steelers. I've never heard any of what you're saying. NFL.com reported the deal was done. Any proof of what you're saying would be appreciated since as far as I know a deal was in place then AB said he doesn't want to come to Buffalo. Beane never denied that AB nixed the deal, he simply said the Bills backed away, which could mean they backed away after AB said he wouldn't report to Buffalo.

Did Beane say they never made an offer to the Steelers? I've only heard hm say they backed off the deal. Which could mean after the deal was agreed upon with Steelers, Antonio said he wouldn't come to Buffalo, then they backed away.

huh?

Beane traded a 2nd round pick for a 4th before he ever played a single down for the Bills.

Depending on the price, yes. Obviously, if he wanted to play here. At this point, there's a good chance he's just trying to miss preseason. The future 3rd and 5th round pick wouldn't be contributing at all either. If he starts missing regular season games that's a different story. The deal was done. We traded for him. Otherwise it wouldn't have been reported. Teams talk all the time and it's never reported as a done deal.

" ...doctors believe it will be a quick recovery after getting clear look at his MRI" "When asked if Metcalf has a shot to play Week 1 against the Cincinnati Bengals on Sept. 8, Carroll simply repeated that they're optimistic." "Metcalf has been in line to be a major part of a Seahawks offense that no longer features Doug Baldwin." "'We're disappointed for him because he was off to a fantastic start, but I don't think this is going to derail him for long'" That's pretty much the rest of the article. If you only read the cherry picked quotes from the OP, you may have thought it was ok to gloat about being "right" predicting a draft prospect is going to get injured. I can do the same thing. I think Cody Ford is too heavy. He had a broken leg in college and that's the reason. I predict he will be injured at some point during his career playing FOOTBALL. We will see if I am correct. Expect a thread about it.

Yes, that’s why I said it.